Before we proceed, I have a few housekeeping matters to go through. I wish to explain some limitations to parliamentary privilege and the practice of the Houses as regards references that witnesses make to other persons in their evidence. Witnesses attending today's committee are protected by absolute privilege in respect of the presentation they make to the committee. This means that they have absolute defence against any defamation actions for anything they say at the meeting. However, they are expected not to abuse this privilege. It is my duty as Chair to ensure that this privilege is not abused. Therefore, if witnesses' statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.
I advise members of the constitutional requirement that they must be physically present within the confines of the Leinster House complex in order to participate in public meetings. I will not permit a member to participate if they are not adhering to this constitutional requirement. Therefore, a member who attempts to participate from outside the parliamentary precincts will be asked to leave this meeting. In this regard, I ask any member partaking via Microsoft Teams to confirm they are on the grounds of the Leinster House campus.
Members and witnesses are reminded of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way to make him, her or it identifiable, or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of the person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity they will be directed to discontinue their remarks, and it is imperative they comply with any such direction.
I propose that we publish the opening statements and submissions provided by the witnesses on the committee website. Is that agreed? Agreed.
With regard to speaking arrangements, witnesses will be invited to speak for approximately ten minutes. I will then allow members to ask questions and make comments for approximately seven minutes. We will have a second round of questioning if time permits, when members will be allowed to ask questions or make comments for approximately four minutes. Members may be called as they appear on the week 2 speaking rota, which was circulated before the meeting. Committee members may substitute within their parties or groups. Non-members or substitutes may only speak after committee members or substitutes have spoken. Are these arrangements satisfactory and agreed? Agreed.
The minutes of the meetings of 26 May, 27 May and 9 June were circulated and approved in private session. Are those minutes agreed? Agreed.
The items on today's agenda are competitiveness and the cost of doing business in Ireland and views on budget 2027. The committee has decided to invite witnesses here to talk about these issues.
I welcome our witnesses here today. We have the following stakeholders: from the Irish Road Haulage Association, Mr. Ger Hyland, president, and Ms Sandra Dennehy, vice president; from the Licensed Vintners Association, Mr. Donall O'Keeffe, chief executive; from the Restaurants Association of Ireland, Mr. Adrian Cummins, chief executive, Ms Eimear Killian, vice president, Mr. Liam Hayes, public affairs and communications executive, and Mr. Paul Lenehan, past president; and from the Vintners Federation of Ireland, Mr. Pat Crotty, chief executive officer and Mr. Michael O'Donovan, president. They are all most welcome and I thank them for being here. I invite Mr. Hyland of the Irish Road Haulage Association to make his opening statement.1