Good morning. Apologies have been received from Senator Imelda Goldsboro. Ironically, I have received several messages that a number of members are running late because of a delayed train.
The purpose of today's meeting is to discuss the recently announced changes by the National Transport Authority, NTA, in the national fare structure for public service obligation, PSO, services. I welcome Mr. Hugh Creegan, deputy chief executive of the NTA, and Mr. Jeremy Ryan, director of public transport services. The purpose of today's meeting is relatively straightforward, in that the NTA has made a decision that will affect public transport passengers across the country, and it is appropriate that we understand the rationale for that decision. I recognise that there are significant pressures associated with maintaining and expanding our public transport network. We all want to see more services. We want to see greater capacity and connectivity, particularly in parts of the country where public transport provision still urgently needs significant improvement.
Equally, affordability matters. At a time when Government policy is encouraging more people to choose public transport, passengers are entitled to understand why fares are increasing, what alternatives were considered and how the impact on regular commuters was assessed. We will approach today's discussion with an open mind. It is not about suggesting that public transport can be expanded without being paid for. It is about understanding whether the balance being struck between passenger fares and Exchequer support is the right one. I really look forward to the NTA's evidence today.
On the format of the meeting, we will hear the opening statement, followed by a questions and answers session with the members of the committee. I ask members to be concise in their questions to allow witnesses the opportunity to participate.
I will read the usual note on privilege. I remind our witnesses of the long-standing parliamentary practice that they should not criticise or make charges against any person or entity by name or in such a way as to make him, her or it identifiable or otherwise engage in speech that might be regarded as damaging to the good name of that person or entity. Therefore, if their statements are potentially defamatory in relation to an identifiable person or entity, they will be directed to discontinue their remarks. It is imperative that they comply with any such direction.
For the members, I remind them of the long-standing parliamentary practice to the effect they should not comment on, criticise or make charges against a person outside the Houses, or an official, either by name or in such a way as to make him or her identifiable.
I will allow members seven minutes for questions and answers. Thereafter, I will let in other members for a shorter period, to be agreed with the membership.
I now invite Mr. Creegan to make his opening statement on behalf of the NTA.