Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 25 Nov 2025

Written Answers Nos. 258-277

Tax Data

Questions (259)

Barry Heneghan

Question:

259. Deputy Barry Heneghan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance if he will examine the extent to which current house price inflation is increasing local property tax liabilities for homeowners, particularly in areas where rising valuations are placing additional financial pressure on households; if his Department has assessed the impact of these valuation changes on families and older people in constituencies such as Dublin bay north; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65320/25]

View answer

Written answers

Earlier this year, officials in Revenue’s Statistics Branch conducted an extensive modelling and valuation exercise in respect of Local Property Tax (LPT) liable properties for the valuation period 2026-2030. The purpose of this work was to inform policy decisions and to provide guidance to taxpayers on the valuation of their properties for the upcoming LPT valuation period 2026-2030. A paper outlining the process was published in September and is available on Revenue’s website: www.revenue.ie/en/corporate/documents/research/property-valuation-technical-paper-2026.pdf.

As part of this paper, Revenue has produced an estimation of the distribution of the LPT register of properties under the 2026-2030 valuation bands. This is based on the values of properties on the LPT register from 2021 and then rolled forward using the Residential Property Price Index (RPPI) compiled by the Central Statistics Office: www.cso.ie/en/statistics/prices/residentialpropertypriceindex/.

RPPI data show that the estimated growth in prices was approximately 21% for the Dublin region for the purposes of the Revenue modelling exercise.

Earlier this year, Government agreed to a 20% widening of the LPT valuation bands and a reduction in the base rate of LPT, with the result that the majority of properties are estimated to remain in their existing valuation band. While it is not possible to examine the impact of the new structure on specific electoral areas, the Revenue technical paper estimates that 96% of properties located in Dublin City Council's area will remain in their existing band. A small amount of properties (2%) are projected to move up a band, with the same amount projected to drop a band. Following an analysis of the LPT returns filed this month, data will subsequently become available on properties’ LPT liability and band movement as determined by self-assessed returns.

Property owners which remain in their present band will experience a small increase in base LPT liability. For the majority of properties, being those valued at or below €525,000, the increase will be between €5-25 annually. This represents the first increase in base LPT charges since the introduction of the tax in 2013. Accordingly, Government have agreed it is fair to ask property owners to pay a small amount more going forward, with the result of raising approximately €45 million in additional funding for local services.

A small number of properties will move up a band due to significant appreciation in value since 2021. It was not possible to ensure these properties would remain in their current band without consequentially causing many other properties to drop one or more bands. I believe that we have struck an appropriate balance with the charging mechanism for 2026-2030.

The LPT legislation provides for the possibility of deferring the charge to LPT in certain circumstances to assist individuals who may have difficulty paying the tax. A qualifying person may opt to defer, or partially defer, payment of the tax. Where a person qualifies for a full deferral, 100% of the liability can be deferred. Where a person qualifies for partial deferral, then 50% of the liability can be deferred. The balance of 50% of the tax must be paid. The deferred tax remains as a charge on the property and must be paid before a sale or transfer can be completed. Interest is charged at 3% per annum on the deferred amount.

It is also possible to apply for a deferral on the grounds of hardship if a person suffers an unexpected and unavoidable significant loss or expense, as a result of which a person cannot pay their LPT liability without suffering financial hardship. Further information regarding the deferral of LPT is available on the Revenue website at: www.revenue.ie/en/property/local-property-tax/deferral-of-payment/index.aspx.

Following the enactment of the Finance (Local Property Tax and Other Provisions) (Amendment) Act 2025 this July, the income thresholds for deferral of LPT for the upcoming valuation period have increased by between 30% and 40% depending on personal circumstances. This ensures that deferral remains an option for households at greater risk of financial hardship.

Any property owners experiencing financial difficulties can avail of a wide range of flexible payment options both in respect of their LPT liabilities and for any previous years where liabilities remain outstanding. The full range of payment options, which includes phased arrangements, are available to property owners on the Revenue website at: www.revenue.ie/en/property/local-property-tax/paying-your-lpt/index.aspx.

Finally, property owners experiencing difficulties in meeting their LPT obligations can contact Revenue through MyAccount at www.revenue.ie or by calling the LPT helpline at (01) 7383626 from Monday to Friday, 09.30 to 16.30.

European Union

Questions (260)

Malcolm Byrne

Question:

260. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance Ireland's position on the development of an EU Savings and Investment (Capital Markets) Union; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65342/25]

View answer

Written answers

In March 2025, the European Commission launched the SIU Strategy, which includes measures to advance the Capital Markets Union (CMU) project. The Savings and Investment Union (SIU) is the new term for the combination of the Capital Markets Union (CMU) and Banking Union. It is a key priority for this Commission’s legislative term.

From the outset, Ireland has been a strong supporter of the SIU, and we, the Government, but also our financial services sector, will continue to actively be involved in progressing its associated measures.

In our view, we can deliver for all EU citizens most effectively through a multi-centre of excellence SIU model that is open to global capital and expertise and that can exploit the benefits of existing marketplaces and infrastructures. As with the wider single market, competition will be what drives innovation and efficiency gains.

Ireland’s view is that we must take a pragmatic approach and that, in order to best advance the SIU and to truly deepen EU capital markets, we need to focus on areas where broad agreement can be reached.

As you all know, we are entering into a busy period where many important SIU legislative proposals will come quickly. To maintain momentum, we must work diligently and in close coordination with other Member States, the European Parliament and other stakeholders particularly to advance legislative files where progress is readily achievable.

This busy time will also coincide with our Presidency of the Council next year and Ireland will have an eye on trying to advance the SIU as best as it can, from both a top-down and bottom-up perspective, and in line with the ambitious timeline that has been set out in the Commission’s SIU Strategy.

Tax Code

Questions (261)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

261. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the way in which the price of 20 cigarettes in Ireland will be affected given the current European Commission proposal for a new own resource based on a tobacco consumption tax and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65433/25]

View answer

Written answers

On 16 July 2025, as part of its draft Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), the EU Commission published details of new own resources streams to support the EU Budget. One of these new streams is the proposed Tobacco Excise Duty Own Resource (TEDOR). On the same day that the TEDOR proposal was published, the EU Commission also officially adopted a proposal for a recast of the Tobacco Taxation Directive (TTD).

Put simply, the TEDOR proposal is that a portion of every Member State’s excise receipts from manufactured tobacco and related products would go directly to the EU Budget, rather than remaining as domestic revenue. Under the TEDOR proposal a call rate of 15% would apply to each Member State, based on the amount of relevant products released for consumption and the minimum tobacco tax rate applicable to that Member State in a calendar year. Both of these matters are themselves the subject of significant changes under the EU Commission’s proposal for recast of the Tobacco Tax Directive (TTD).

The TEDOR proposal, if adopted, of itself will not give rise to a change in the level of tax applied by Member State to tobacco and related products.

Discussions on the TEDOR proposals, and the proposals to recast the TTD are ongoing at EU level and my Department and Revenue are working closely in progressing these files. Although the two proposals are linked, they are independent of each other.

Tax Code

Questions (262)

Niall Collins

Question:

262. Deputy Niall Collins asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance if he will consider deferring a requirement to register VAT for poultry farmers (details supplied) in order to allow more time to restructure; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65459/25]

View answer

Written answers

The VAT treatment of goods and services is subject to the requirements of EU VAT law with which Irish VAT law is obliged to comply. In general, the EU VAT Directive provides that suppliers of goods and services are required to register for VAT, and to charge and account for VAT on the supplies they make. The Directive also provides that VAT-registered businesses are entitled to claim deductions for VAT they incur on making their supplies.

The Directive allows Member States to operate a simplification arrangement, known as the SME scheme, under which businesses do not need to register for VAT provided their turnover in the current and previous calendar years do not exceed the threshold set by the relevant Member State. The turnover thresholds in Ireland are €85,000 in the case of a business engaged in the supply of goods, and €42,500 for a business engaged in the supply of services or in the supply of both goods and services.

The Directive provides for a further simplification arrangement known as the farmers flat-rate (FFR) scheme which is designed to reduce the administrative burden on farmers. The FFR scheme allows farmers to remain outside the normal VAT system, thereby avoiding the obligations of registration and returns, while permitting them to charge and retain a “flat-rate addition” on the agricultural supplies they make in the course of their farming business, as a way of compensating, on an overall basis, for VAT incurred by FFR farmers on their purchases of goods and services.

With effect from 1 September 2025, broiler chicken services have been excluded from the FFR scheme in accordance with an Order made by my predecessor under Section 86A of the Value-Added Tax (Consolidation) Act 2010. The making of this Order followed extensive consideration of a 2019 report to the Minister for Finance by the Revenue Commissioners of the review Revenue conducted which showed that the broiler chicken services sector was engaged in practices and business models that were leading to systemic overcompensation of the sector under the FFR scheme, contrary to what is permitted by the Directive. Despite the report and repeated engagement by my Department with representatives of the sector, including over the past year, it was clear that the relevant practices and business models in the sector had not changed substantially in the intervening period, and therefore, it was necessary to exclude the sector from the FFR scheme – as is provided for under Section 86A – in order to ensure that Ireland appropriately observes its obligations under EU law to guard the scheme from systemic overcompensation.

Upon exclusion from the flat-rate scheme, broiler chicken services are required, under EU law, to be treated similarly to other services supplied by businesses in Ireland. Amendments to section 6 of the Value-Added Tax Consolidation Act 2010 which are included in section 67 of Finance Bill 2025 (as passed by Dáil Committee) will legislate for this.

Of course, such suppliers may avail of the SME scheme, where applicable to them. Agricultural activities covered by the FFR scheme are not included in the calculation of the threshold for the purposes of the SME scheme. However, once a business is VAT registered, the registration overs all activities of the business. This means that a farming business which is VAT-registered cannot also avail of the FFR which, in accordance with EU law, is solely available for unregistered farmers.

Therefore, following enactment of the Finance Bill, farmers who supply broiler chicken services will be required to register for VAT from the date their supplies of goods and services, other than those covered by the FFR scheme, reaches €42,500 in a calendar year. Thus, there is already lead in time to allow mixed farmers restructure their enterprises, if they so desire.

Revenue has already issued detailed guidance for broiler farmers regarding the implications of the Section 86A Order, and Revenue will shortly issue further guidance on enactment of the Finance Bill. Any delay in aligning the registration requirement for broiler chicken services with other agricultural supplies outside the FFR scheme, and other taxable goods and services, would undermine the integrity of both the FFR and SME schemes, and exposes Ireland to the risk of infringement proceedings by the European Commission.

Finally, it is important to note that the FFR scheme is solely designed to reduce the administrative burden on farmers. No additional VAT is incurred by a farmer who registers for VAT. When registered, the farmer is obliged to charge VAT on their supplies and is entitled to claim a deduction for VAT incurred on inputs used for the purposes of making those taxable supplies.

Economic Data

Questions (263)

Pearse Doherty

Question:

263. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the ratio of private sector indebtedness as a share of GNI since 2015, as defined as part of the European Commission’s macroeconomic imbalances procedure, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65552/25]

View answer

Written answers

Table 1 sets out the latest data from Eurostat on Irish private sector debt since 2015. The most recent iteration of the European Commission’s macroeconomic imbalances procedure (MIP) scoreboard provides a breakdown of private sector debt including household debt and non-financial corporate (NFC) debt (both as a share of GDP).

It should be noted that NFC debt includes intra-company liabilities of large multinational enterprises operating in Ireland. For this reason GDP is likely a more appropriate denominator for ratio analysis of NFC debt. On this basis, while still relatively elevated, NFC debt has declined very significantly from over 250 per cent of GDP in 2015 to 91 per cent last year.

Table 1 also shows private sector debt as a share of GNI and modified GNI (GNI*) over the past decade. GNI* is the preferred metric for the size of the Irish economy and for ‘ratio analysis’ of more domestically-oriented indicators such as household debt, as it strips out the main globalisation-related distortions from Irish GDP. Household debt as a share of GNI* has fallen significantly over the last decade reflecting continued deleveraging as well as very strong growth in the domestic economy.

Table 1: Private sector indebtedness

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Private sector debt, % GDP

312.8

297.4

266.3

245.3

209.8

189.5

159.2

144.8

136.2

114.7

Households

56.8

52.3

52.4

46.7

35.0

33.0

28.2

26.7

25.6

23.8

NFCs

256.0

245.1

213.9

198.6

174.8

156.6

131.0

118.2

110.7

90.9

Private sector debt, % GNI

402.6

365.2

339.4

323.7

278.4

259.6

223.1

211.9

182.8

152.7

Households

73.2

64.2

66.8

61.6

46.4

45.2

39.5

39.0

34.3

31.6

NFCs

329.5

301.0

272.6

262.1

232.0

214.4

183.6

172.9

148.5

121.0

Private sector debt, % modified GNI

507.0

473.7

444.6

429.0

369.4

364.9

310.1

282.8

245.3

201.0

Households

92.1

83.3

87.5

81.6

61.6

63.5

54.9

52.1

46.0

41.7

NFCs

414.9

390.4

357.1

347.4

307.8

301.4

255.2

230.8

199.2

159.4

Source: Eurostat, CSO

Digital Hubs

Questions (264)

Aengus Ó Snodaigh

Question:

264. Deputy Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the steps he will take in response to issues facing the Digital Hub Development Agency (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65740/25]

View answer

Written answers

In response to the Deputy’s question, he should first note that while I have responsibility for the Residential Zoned Land Tax, my colleague the Minister for Housing Local Government and Heritage has responsibility for the vacant site levy. Therefore, my officials sought material for this reply on the latter issue from the Department of Housing Local Government and Heritage.

Firstly, I will cover the Residential Zoned Land Tax issue. Finance Act 2021 introduced Part 22A Residential Zoned Land Tax (RZLT) into the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997. RZLT is designed to prompt residential development by owners of land that satisfies the relevant criteria for the tax, that being that the land is zoned for residential or mixed-use (including residential) purposes and that is serviced.

RZLT is an annual tax, calculated at a rate of 3% of the market value of the land within its scope. The tax was first charged in 2025 in respect of land which satisfied the relevant criteria in 2022. The first RZLT liability arose on 1 February 2025 and was payable in May 2025, subject to certain exemptions and deferrals. The 2026 liability will arise on 1 February 2026 and is payable by 23 May 2026.

The legislation underpinning RZLT requires local authorities to consider whether land satisfies the relevant criteria for the tax, being that the land in question is zoned for residential use, serviced and not otherwise excluded from the relevant criteria, and to prepare and publish maps identifying land within the scope of the tax. These maps are updated annually for any changes in the zoning and servicing status of the land which has already been included on such maps, to reflect any additional land which falls within the scope of the tax and to exclude any land that has fallen outside the scope of the tax.

Draft revised maps are published by local authorities by 1 February each year and owners of land appearing on draft revised maps are provided with an opportunity to make submissions regarding whether their land satisfies the relevant criteria and the date from which it satisfied the criteria. If a local authority determines that land subject to such a submission does satisfy the relevant criteria for inclusion on the draft revised map, the legislation affords the landowner an opportunity to appeal the local authority determination to An Coimisiún Pleanála.

The tax is charged in respect of land included on revised maps published by local authorities by 31 January in the year after the publication of the draft revised maps, which reflect the outcome of the submissions and appeals processes. The Deputy should note that I have no influence over this process.

In relation to the vacant site levy the Minister for Housing Local Government and Heritage has advised that under Section 30 of the Planning and Development Act 2000, he is precluded from exercising any power or control in relation to any particular case with which a planning authority is or may be concerned.

He has further advised that under the vacant site levy provisions in the Urban Regeneration and Housing Act 2015 (the Act), planning authorities were empowered to apply a vacant site levy of 3% of the market valuation of relevant properties which were listed on local authority vacant site registers in 2018, which relevant owners were liable to pay in January 2019. The rate of the levy increased to 7% for sites listed on local authority vacant sites registers from 2019 onwards which site owners became liable to pay in January of the following year. Under Section 19 of the Act, unpaid levies due remain a charge on the land in question until they are paid and the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage (DHLGH) continues to engage with local authorities to ensure that all vacant site levies due are paid.

DHLGH requests annual progress reports from local authorities in respect of the Vacant Site Levy. The information provided annually by each local authority is as follows - the value of sites liable, the number and value of demand letters issued, the value and number of sites for which payments were collected, the value and number of sites for which payments are outstanding etc.

DHLGH recently issued Circular Letter SPI 02-2025 to local authorities requesting the submission of a further progress report on the implementation and collection of the levy in respect of the year 2024. It should be noted that local authorities do not provide a breakdown on individual properties and granular details on individual properties is a matter for the relevant local authority.

Finally, the Deputy should be aware that the Government is strongly committed to the use of vacant or underutilised state land for housing. In this regard the Minister for Housing Local Government and Heritage has advised there has been agreement to the transfer to date of 37 sites to the Land Development Agency (LDA) to develop social and affordable housing. The Digital Hub site, currently occupied by the Digital Hub Development Agency (DHDA) was agreed for transfer by Government under Housing for All. The LDA is currently at advanced planning stage on the initial enabling works application which will form the basis of the overall regeneration of this 3.7-hectare site, called Pear Tree Crossing. Approximately 570 homes are planned, and the site will also include a vibrant mix of commercial, cultural, and community facilities.

Agreement is in place between the DHDA and the LDA, and the process to effect the legal transfer of the site is currently underway.

Vehicle Registration

Questions (265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

265. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the procedures in place within his Department and within the Revenue Commissioners to monitor the continued use of foreign-registered vehicles operating in the State under temporary exemption; the number of compliance checks carried out in each of the past three years; the number of breaches identified; the corrective actions taken; and the engagement his Department has had with An Garda Síochána regarding road-safety and insurance risks arising from such vehicles. [65743/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

266. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the number of temporary vehicle-registration exemptions granted to Ukrainian-registered vehicles that have been extended beyond the initial twelve-month period; the criteria applied when granting such extensions; the average duration of extensions granted; and the steps taken to ensure that exemptions do not become a de-facto substitute for registration. [65744/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

267. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the reason the Revenue Commissioners do not record the number of Ukrainian-registered vehicles entering the State under temporary protection arrangements; whether his Department has considered establishing a data-capture mechanism in cooperation with the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration and An Garda Síochána; and the steps being taken to ensure accurate monitoring of foreign-registered vehicles operating in the State. [65745/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

268. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the average processing time for Ukrainian-registered vehicles transitioning to Irish registration; the number of applications refused; the reasons for refusal; and whether his Department has reviewed any barriers preventing owners from completing the registration process within the required timeframe. [65747/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

269. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the number of compliance checks carried out by the Revenue Commissioners in each of the past three years on foreign-registered vehicles operating in the State under temporary exemption; the number of breaches identified; the corrective actions taken; and the engagement his Department has had with An Garda Síochána to ensure consistent enforcement of vehicle-registration rules. [65749/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

270. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the number of temporary vehicle-registration exemptions granted to Ukrainian-registered vehicles that have been extended beyond the initial twelve-month period; the criteria used when granting such extensions; and the measures in place to prevent temporary exemptions becoming a long-term substitute for the standard registration process. [65750/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

271. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the reason the Revenue Commissioners does not record the number of Ukrainian-registered vehicles entering the State under temporary protection arrangements; whether his Department has examined the feasibility of a coordinated data-capture mechanism with the Department of Justice; and the steps being taken to ensure accurate monitoring of foreign-registered vehicles operating in the State. [65751/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

272. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the average processing time for Ukrainian-registered vehicles transitioning to Irish vehicle registration; the number of applications refused; the reasons for refusal; and the actions taken by his Department to address any barriers that prevent owners from completing the process within the statutory timeframe. [65753/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

273. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the process within his Department for reviewing the operation of temporary vehicle-registration exemptions for Ukrainian nationals; the frequency of these reviews; the indicators used to assess compliance and road-safety risk; and the planned policy changes under consideration in response to the rise in exemption applications identified in recent PQ replies. [65754/25]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272 and 273 together.

The Finance Act 1992, as amended, sets out the rules governing vehicle registration and Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT). In general, the legislation obliges an individual who brings a vehicle into the State to register it within 30 days, and VRT is charged at the point of registration. Section 135 of the Act provides for certain limited circumstances in which a vehicle that is temporarily brought into the State may be exempted from the requirement to be registered.

The Temporary Exemption from Registration of Vehicles Regulations, 1993, (S.I. No. 60 of 1993) set out details regarding the arrangements for temporary exemption. To qualify for temporary exemption, the vehicle must be owned or registered abroad by a person established outside the State. The vehicle cannot be disposed of, hired out in the State, or lent to a person established in the State. It cannot be driven by a person established in the State, except with the permission of Revenue. The vehicle cannot be used for the carriage of person for reward within the State or used to transport goods for business purposes between places within the State in the case of a passenger car or a motor-cycle. Temporary exemptions are normally granted for a period of 12 months and can be extended at the discretion of the Commissioners.

I am advised by Revenue that its approach to enforcement of the law relating to vehicle registration and Vehicle Registration Tax (VRT) generally is that in each instance where a failure to comply with the relevant legal requirements is detected, the matter is dealt with in a manner that is fair and proportionate in the circumstances of the particular case. Section 5.4.2 of the VRT Enforcement Manual gives examples of the forms of action appropriate in the various situations that a Revenue Officer may encounter. In certain instances, a warning will be given or a VRT Demand Notice issued in accordance with Section 5.5 of the Manual. In addition, a vehicle may be detained under section 140(3) of the Finance Act 2001 for certain reasons including where an Officer has reasonable suspicion that the vehicle has not been registered in the State and may be detained for up to a month to allow for the carrying out of enquires. Also, where an Officer forms the view that a person is a resident of the State, in possession of an unregistered vehicle contrary to section 139 of the Finance Act 1992 and has had the vehicle here for more than 30 days, the vehicle may be seized in accordance with Section 141 of the Finance Act 2001.

In the normal course of their duties, Revenue’s enforcement teams monitor compliance with reliefs and exemptions that are granted with regard to vehicle registration and VRT, and this is actioned mainly via checkpoint activity. When a vehicle is encountered that has a temporary exemption and an Officer considers that a new application should be made, either due to the length of time since the original exemption or a possible change in circumstances, the Officer will advise the driver that a new application must be made; this is then monitored and followed up by the local station for appropriate action. Revenue do not record statistics in relation to activity specific to temporary exemption, however, the table below outlines the overall numbers of cases where enforcement action has been taken in relation to vehicle registration and VRT generally in the past 3 years:

Year

Written

Warning

Detention

Seizure

Compromise sum paid

2023

361

54

900

882

2024

369

23

925

892

2025 (end of Oct)

394

39

786

744

Ukrainian nationals who are fleeing the war in their country and seeking temporary protection are covered by the provisions of the EU Temporary Protection Directive (2001/55 EC) following the Directive’s activation by Council Decision EU 2022/382 of 4 March 2022. The Directive’s application to Ukrainians has been extended on a number of occasions, most recently until 4 March 2027 in accordance with EU Council Decision (EU) 2025/1460 of 15 July 2025. Under the terms of the Temporary Protection Directive, Ukrainian nationals are eligible for temporary protection in the State, initially for one year and on a renewable basis.

Provided they meet the relevant requirements of the legislation governing vehicle registration, Ukrainian nationals who are in the State with Temporary Protection status, are entitled to seek registration, or temporary exemption from registration, for a vehicle they have brought into the State.

The procedure for getting a Ukrainian-registered vehicle registered in Ireland is the same procedure as applies for any other foreign-registered vehicle that is brought into the State. The procedure is governed by legislation, and the details are set out in Revenue guidance. Ukrainian vehicles face no additional barriers to registration. Imported used vehicles are registered only following inspection at a National Car Testing Service (NCTS) Centre. Revenue is not aware of any Ukrainian registered vehicle which has applied to register in the State that has been refused.

Temporary exemptions for Ukrainian-registered vehicles are for a period of 12 months and may be renewed at the discretion of Revenue on a rolling 12-month basis. This 12-month period generally aligns with the period of validity of the Temporary Protection permission granted by the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration. Each application for an extension to the vehicle registration temporary exemption is reviewed by Revenue’s National Vehicle Registration Service (NVRTS) on a case-by-case basis and this helps to ensure that the conditions under which temporary exemptions is available continue to apply.

Over 1,400 Ukrainian nationals have applied for a temporary exemption in respect of a vehicle, and more than 1,300 vehicles have been granted exemption from registration beyond the initial twelve-month period. Of these 74 vehicles have been granted an exemption for a second twelve-month period and 8 vehicles an exemption for a third twelve-month period.

In accordance with legislation, a person bringing a vehicle into the State is generally required to have it registered within 30 days of its entry into the State, or alternatively a person and their vehicle may qualify for temporary exemption from registration. There is no requirement for Revenue to record vehicles coming into the State, whether generally or in relation to Ukrainian-registered vehicles specifically, and Revenue does not hold records on such movements. The introduction of a data-capture mechanism as suggested by the Deputy for the vehicles of Temporary Protection applicants as they enter the State would be a policy matter for my colleague the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.

The temporary exemption from registration which has been granted for the vehicles of Ukrainian holders of Temporary Protection status is monitored on an ongoing basis as part of Revenue’s business systems and processes. Revenue adopts a risk-based approach, and the factors used to assess the risks include the number of applications received, documentation provided and intelligence, both from within Revenue and from external sources. The operation of VRT temporary exemptions is kept under review, which includes engagement with Department of Transport which has policy responsibility in relation to road safety and for various other matters concerning vehicles. On foot of this work, Revenue has prepared notifications that will issue shortly to over 1,300 owners of Ukrainian-registered vehicles that have been granted temporary exemption. The purpose of these notifications is to advise the owners about applying to extend the temporary exemption or to register their vehicle. The notifications also include information provided by the Department of Transport from the Road Safety Authority on the availability of a voluntary inspection programme for Ukrainian vehicles which are in the State but not registered here.

Question No. 266 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 267 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 268 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 269 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 270 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 271 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 272 answered with Question No. 265.
Question No. 273 answered with Question No. 265.

Tax Collection

Questions (274)

Albert Dolan

Question:

274. Deputy Albert Dolan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the number of social media influencers registered for taxation with the Revenue Commissioners, by county; the number that have been audited over the past five years; the number of auditors that have been assigned to such work; the number of influencers that have been subjected to fines; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65755/25]

View answer

Written answers

Revenue monitors tax compliance through a range of risk identification, assessment and evaluation programmes and processes that are supported by data analytics and interrogation of the wide range of information available. This includes, among other sources, information received from third parties such as online platform operators. I am informed by Revenue that it is aware of, and monitors, information which is available in the public domain, matching this data with its own records and cross-checking with taxpayer declarations. This enables Revenue to highlight discrepancies and identify those who may not be fully compliant with their tax obligations.

I am advised that Revenue uses a European standard classification system, known as ‘NACE’ to categorise the economic activities or sectors of taxpayers. In the NACE system, engagement in social media and other online platforms is not separately categorised. In addition, these types of operations are often part of wider economic activities undertaken by taxpayers and it is therefore not possible for Revenue to identify or report on the registrations specific to this sector.

In relation to those using social media and other online platforms to conduct business activities, Revenue is aware that this practice has become more prevalent in recent years. This is, therefore, an emerging area of focus within Revenue’s ongoing programmes to support voluntary compliance and address areas of non-compliance. The tax obligations applicable to influencers, content creators or other individuals operating through online platforms are no different than those operating in other sectors. Receipts, whether monetary or non-monetary, received in connection with the provision of a service are treated as income for the provision of the related service.

In July 2025, Revenue published new Tax and Duty manuals providing guidance on the VAT treatment of social media influencers and on the tax treatment of income derived from social media and certain promotional activities. The manuals set out the tax compliance obligations of persons engaged in such activities and are available on the Revenue website at :

www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/value-added-tax/part03-taxable-transactions-goods-ica-services/Services/vat-treatment-of-social-media-influencers.pdf and

www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-04/04-01-22.pdf.

In addition, where an individual receives a gift from somebody or has the free use of somebody’s property, which is not received in connection with the provision of a service, they may be required to submit a Capital Acquisitions Tax (CAT) return and pay any corresponding liability.

In the period 2020 – 2025, Revenue completed 77 Level 2 compliance interventions in relation to social media influencers, content creators or other individuals operating through online platforms. Total yield arising from these interventions amounted to €3,319,331. During the same period, Revenue issued 457 Level 1 compliance intervention notices to individuals involved in online business activities. These interventions are designed to support voluntary compliance and form part of Revenue’s broader Compliance Intervention Framework. The interventions were undertaken by Revenue’s audit and compliance teams based in Compliance Branches across the country; these teams carry out interventions across multiple sectors and are not assigned to social media and related activity on a full-time basis.

Tax Data

Questions (275, 276)

Ged Nash

Question:

275. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance in view of the recent guidance from the Revenue Commissioners which provides employers an opportunity to correct any payroll tax issues arising from the Supreme Court Karshan ruling of 2023, his plans to enforce the Karshan ruling to ensure that all workers who should be classified as employees have such a classification; the means by which he intends to ensure there is a level playing field for those employers who take the opportunity to make these corrections; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65773/25]

View answer

Ged Nash

Question:

276. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance following on from the recent guidance from the Revenue Commissioners which provides employers an opportunity to correct any payroll tax issues arising from the Supreme Court Karshan ruling of 2023, the means by which the Revenue Commissioners will ensure that all employers who have previously classified their employees as self-employed are adhering to the ruling, the means by which the Revenue Commissioners intends to enforce this; whether more staff will be required to enforce this adequately; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [65774/25]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 275 and 276 together.

On 20th of October 2023 the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, delivered an important judgment on the key factors to be considered when classifying an individual’s employment status for income tax purposes.

The detailed judgment was delivered by Mr. Justice Brian Murray in The Revenue Commissioners v. Karshan (Midlands) Ltd. t/a Domino’s Pizza. The case was concerned with whether the delivery drivers were independent contractors under a “contract for service”, and therefore taxable under Schedule D of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, or employees under a “contract of service”, and taxable under Schedule E of that Act (PAYE).

The judgment sets out an extensive review of relevant caselaw and succinctly summarises it through the provision of a five-step decision-making framework. The decision-making framework consists of five questions that are to be used to resolve the question of whether a contract is one of service (employee) or for service (self-employed). Under the self-assessment tax system, each business making payments to individuals is obliged to correctly determine whether those individuals are employed or self-employed, based on the facts and circumstances of each relationship and by applying the five-step framework. While the judgment related to a company engaging individuals as delivery drivers, as a decision of the Irish Supreme Court, the judgement has application across all sectors.

I am advised by Revenue that a detailed Tax and Duty Manual (TDM), to provide guidance in relation to the application of the judgment, and to assist businesses who engage individuals to carry out work, is available. The TDM, Part 05-01-30, was published on 21 May 2024 and is available at: www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/income-tax-capital-gains-tax-corporation-tax/part-05/05-01-30.pdf.

In September 2025, following on from the Supreme Court judgement in the Karshan case, Revenue announced that employers can correct payroll tax issues for 2024 and 2025 arising from bona-fide classification errors, without imposition of interest and penalty, if they do so before 30 January 2026. Employers who acted in good faith, relying on the case law and guidance available prior to the Supreme Court judgment, but who may have misclassified employees as contractors, are encouraged to take this opportunity to regularise their tax affairs.

Guidance on this disclosure opportunity is set out in Tax and Duty Manual ‘Settlement arrangement arising from Revenue v Karshan (Midlands) Ltd. trading as Domino’s Pizza’ which is available at: www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/tdm/compliance/audit-and-other-compliance-interventions/karshan-settlement-guidance/karshan-disclosure-opportunity-guidance.pdf.

Where an employer fails to take this opportunity to review its workforce practices and make a relevant disclosure, by 30 January 2026, and the liabilities from misclassification subsequently come to light, Revenue will form the view that the default has arisen from a complete failure to operate fiduciary taxes, PAYE, PRSI and USC, and will apply the relevant legislation to address this. Interest and penalties will apply in full in line with Revenue’s Code of Practice for Revenue Compliance Interventions which is available at: www.revenue.ie/en/tax-professionals/documents/code-of-practice-revenue-compliance-interventions.pdf

I am further advised by Revenue that it allocates significant resources to manage tax compliance. Revenue's risk-based compliance programme collates and assesses information from multiple sources to build profiles and assess overall risk. Risk associated with misclassification is taken into consideration, along with other risks identified, to target and confront the riskiest cases.

The tax risks associated with misclassification are not new, and in terms of Revenue compliance interventions, it is important to note that each compliance intervention is different, and the facts and circumstances of each case will inform Revenue’s response. Coupled with that, employment classification is a complex area, and each determination must be made on the facts and circumstances of each individual case.

Through detailed guidance, the provision of the disclosure opportunity and targeted risk-focused compliance interventions, Revenue has a comprehensive framework to support voluntary compliance for taxpayers with their self-assessment obligations, as well as to detect and challenge misclassification. Revenue is focused on continuing to maximise the use of its extensive resources to identify misclassification non-compliance and quantify risk while minimising the administrative burden on compliant taxpayers.

Question No. 276 answered with Question No. 275.

Departmental Staff

Questions (277)

Pádraig O'Sullivan

Question:

277. Deputy Pádraig O'Sullivan asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance the number of former secretary general’s, retired civil servants, directors of service, retired city/county managers or those of a similar grade in his Department that have subsequently served on State boards; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [66005/25]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to inform the Deputy that The Civil Service Code of Standards and Behaviour requires former civil servants to seek approval from the Department to take up an appointment or engagement within 12 months of leaving service.

My department has not been notified of any civil servants retired within the last 12 months taking up duty on State Boards. The time period in respect of this requirement for previous Secretary General’s has elapsed.

Any information in respect of directors of service, retired city/county managers would be a matter for individual local authorities.

Share