Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 4 Dec 2025

Written Answers Nos. 250-269

Civil Service

Questions (250)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

250. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the number of conflict-of-interest statements received by the Standards in Public Office Commission since January 2020 relating to Ministers, Ministers of State, special advisers or senior civil servants whose family members hold financial interests in companies involved in the manufacture or supply of pharmaceuticals or medical devices; and the number of such statements that related specifically to decisions on paediatric or adolescent healthcare policy. [68782/25]

View answer

Written answers

I have previously described to the Deputy the statutory procedures to be followed where an office holder such as a Minister or Minister of State, or a senior official, finds that they or a family member has a material interest such as that described by the Deputy in a function of their office that falls to be performed.

Where the statements to which the Deputy refers are required under the legislation he cites, these must be furnished, in the case of a Minister or Minister of State, to the Taoiseach and the Standards in Public Office Commission. Where the office holder concerned is the Taoiseach, he or she must furnish any such statement to the Chairman of the Standards in Public Office Commission. Any other office holder will furnish any such statement to the Commission. Special Advisers furnish their statements to the relevant Minister and to the Commission. Details of the statements received by the Commission are a matter for that body, which is independent the performance of its functions.

Senior officials are treated separately under the legislation. In their case, the statement at issue must be furnished to the relevant authority, which would be the Secretary General of the Department concerned. Details of any such statements are a matter for the relevant Department or office and my Department does not hold any centralised records in this respect. If the Senior Official is a Secretary General, the statement must be furnished to the Secretary General of my Department, and, where relevant, the Secretary General of my Department must furnish his statement to the Secretary General of the Department of Finance.

In the cases of statements made to the Secretary General of my Department, I am informed that no statements concerning the matters in the Deputy’s question have been made to the Secretary General since January 2020.

Civil Service

Questions (251)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

251. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if he will outline any plans to establish a central reporting mechanism for recusals or conflict-of-interest statements made under the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 and Standards in Public Office Act 2001, in order to ensure consistent oversight in areas of emerging medical policy, including paediatric gender-related services; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [68783/25]

View answer

Written answers

I have previously described to the Deputy the procedures to be followed under the legislation that he cites where an office holder such as a Minister or Minister of State, or a senior official, finds that they or a family member has a material interest in a function of their office that falls to be performed.

Where the statements to which the Deputy refers are required under the legislation he cites, these must be furnished, in the case of a Minister or Minister of State, to the Taoiseach and the Standards in Public Office Commission. Where the office holder concerned is the Taoiseach, he or she must furnish any such statement to the Chairman of the Standards in Public Office Commission. Any other office holder will furnish any such statement to the Commission.

Senior officials must furnish a written statement to the relevant authority, which would be the Secretary General of the Department concerned. If the Senior Official is a Secretary General, the statement must be furnished to the Secretary General of my Department, and, where relevant, the Secretary General of my Department must furnish his statement to the Secretary General of the Department of Finance.

The 2025 Programme for Government contains a commitment to “Update the Ethics in Public Office legislation” and proposals to reform the legislative framework are currently being prepared by my Department in order to deliver this commitment. The general issue of the suitability of the procedures described above will be considered as part of this comprehensive reform process.

Civil Service

Questions (252, 257)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

252. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if any review has been undertaken by his Department since January 2020 on whether current ethics legislation is sufficient to address conflicts of interest arising from new or emerging medical technologies, including puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, surgical pathways for minors and related digital health systems; and if he will list any recommendations identified. [68784/25]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

257. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if his Department has identified any gaps or deficiencies in the current conflict-of-interest framework as applied to emerging medical or technological policy areas, and if he will outline any proposals under consideration to address those gaps. [68791/25]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 252 and 257 together.

During the last Government, my Department undertook a comprehensive review of the statutory framework for ethics in public life, the report of which was submitted to Government at the end of 2022 and published in February 2023. The Review process included, notably, a public consultation process and engagement with Committees of the Oireachtas. The issues referred to in the Deputy’s question were not raised by any party with which the review engaged or during the public consultation process. The particular matters referred to in the Deputy’s question are not covered in the Review report or in its recommendations.

Civil Service

Questions (253)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

253. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the number of Departments that have notified his Department since 2020 of internal policies or protocols for managing conflicts of interest in healthcare-related policy development; and if he will provide a list of those Departments. [68785/25]

View answer

Written answers

The statutory framework for ethics in public life covers matters such as conflicts of interest and applies to elected and appointed public officials. The Code of Standards and Behaviour for Civil Servants, which is also under the auspices of my Department, contains conflict of interest provisions for civil servants. While these general provisions apply to the civil servants of all Government Departments, any further internal policies or protocols are a matter for individual Departments and there is no requirement under this regime that they be notified to my Department. In the above context, I am not aware of any such notification since 2020.

Civil Service

Questions (254)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

254. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if his Department has carried out any assessment of the adequacy of existing guidance on conflicts of interest within the civil service where officials have personal, family or financial links to organisations involved in gender-related clinical services, research, training or advocacy; and if he will provide details of any findings. [68787/25]

View answer

Written answers

The Code of Standards and Behaviour for Civil Servants, which falls under the policy responsibility of my Department, sets out the values, standards and behaviour expected of civil servants and includes certain general provisions on the management of conflicts of interest by civil servants. The Code’s provisions are broad, and intended to be so, and in this context my Department has not carried out any specific assessment of its adequacy in respect to the particular matters described in the Deputy’s question.

Civil Service

Questions (255)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

255. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation if his Department maintains any record of instances since January 2020 in which senior civil servants sought approval to proceed with official functions notwithstanding a declared conflict of interest under the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995; and if he will provide the number of such requests recorded by his Department. [68788/25]

View answer

Written answers

I have previously described to the Deputy the procedures to be followed under the statutory framework for ethics in public life where a senior official finds that they or a family member has a material interest in a function of their office that falls to be performed.

If they find themselves in the situation described in the Deputy’s question, Section 18 of the Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 requires that they do not perform the function concerned unless there are compelling reasons to do so. Where they propose to perform the function, they must furnish before such performance (or if not reasonably practicable, as soon as may be after), a written statement detailing the compelling reasons to the relevant authority, which would, in this case, be the Secretary General of the Department concerned. If the senior official is a Secretary General, the statement must be furnished to the Secretary General of my Department, and in the case where the senior official concerned is the Secretary General of my Department, he must furnish his statement to the Secretary General of the Department of Finance.

As I have previously informed the Deputy, details of any such statements are a matter for the relevant Department or office concerned and my Department does not hold any centralised records in this respect. In the cases of statements made to the Secretary General of my Department, I am informed that no statements concerning the matters detailed in the Deputy’s question have been made to the Secretary General since January 2020.

Civil Service

Questions (256)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

256. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the number of engagements, consultations or meetings his Department has held since January 2020 with the Standards in Public Office Commission to review or update guidance on conflicts of interest, and if any of these engagements addressed medical or technological policy areas involving minors. [68789/25]

View answer

Written answers

The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 and the Standards in Public Office Act 2001 (collectively cited as the Ethics Acts) provide inter alia a legal basis for the management of conflicts of interest by elected and appointed public officials at national level. Under this statutory framework, it falls to the Standards in Public Office Commission, which is independent in the performance of its functions, to review and update guidance on compliance with the legislation and my Department has no role in this. While the Department has had regular and ongoing meetings and consultations with the Commission on a number of issues since January 2020, this engagement has not covered the matters referred to in the Deputy’s question.

Question No. 257 answered with Question No. 252.

Flood Risk Management

Questions (258)

Michael Cahill

Question:

258. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the reason there was an underspend of €7.8 million in flood defences in 2024 (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [68860/25]

View answer

Written answers

In 2018, to establish those communities that are at risk from significant flood events, the OPW completed the largest study of flood risk ever undertaken by the State: the Catchment-based Flood Risk Assessment and Management (CFRAM) Programme. The CFRAM Programme studied 80% of Ireland’s primary flood risk and identified solutions that can protect over 95% of that risk. Some 150 new and additional flood relief schemes were identified through this Programme.

The Government has committed €1.3 billion to the delivery of these flood relief schemes over the lifetime of the National Development Plan to 2030 to protect approximately 23,000 properties in communities that are under threat from river and coastal flood risk.

Since 2018, a phased approach to scheme delivery, in partnership with Local Authorities, has allowed the OPW to treble the number of schemes at design, planning or construction at this time to some 100 schemes. While the OPW strives to expedite and progress capital flood relief works with minimum delay, major flood relief schemes involve complex engineering and construction operations that can impact on people's living, built and natural environment and, therefore, require lengthy planning and decision lead-in times.

Anticipated expenditure in any given year is not without risk and is dependent on a number of factors that can affect total spend. Delays against profiled programme expenditure can occur due to a variety of constraints and factors, including: demand in the market for highly specialised surveys; extended timeframes for planning decisions and Judicial Review processes; and extensive and detailed environmental assessments.

Expenditure in the earlier stages of a project represents a small proportion of the overall budget of a flood relief scheme. Schemes at construction incur the greatest expenditure, and there is no legislative or regulatory means of fast-tracking schemes to this stage.

The Deputy's question relates to the A.5 Flood Risk Management subhead of Vote 13 (Office of Public Works). The total original allocation for Flood Risk Management in 2024 was €82.71m (Capital €77m and Pay €5.71m), which was adjusted downwards to €80.91m in the Supplementary Estimates in September 2024. This revision was largely due to later than anticipated progression of schemes to construction stage during the year.

Ultimately, expenditure to the end of December 2024 was €74.91m, which was notably ahead of expenditure in 2023 (€59.2m), by €15.71m, and was the highest annual OPW expenditure on Flood Risk Management to that date.

It is anticipated that the strong pipeline of future schemes will increase the number of schemes reaching construction, thereby increasing the programme expenditure to 2030.

The OPW engages with the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation on an ongoing basis regarding the Capital and Current funding required under the National Development Plan to 2030, and through the annual budgetary process, to ensure that adequate funding is available to continue to progress the programme of delivery of flood relief schemes.

Wage-setting Mechanisms

Questions (259)

Barry Heneghan

Question:

259. Deputy Barry Heneghan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation further to Parliamentary Question No. 828 of 25 February 2025, if the exclusion of retired medical scientists from the Labour Court recommended pay adjustments is consistent with past practice on pension parity for retired public servants; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [68867/25]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy may be aware, I have overarching responsibility for public service pensions policy, including in relation to pension increases in the public service.

Officials from my Department represented the Government in the national pay talks in the WRC in 2023 and 2024. The subsequently ratified Public Service Agreement 2024-2026 provided for a number of industrial relations issues to be resolved. This included the implementation of a Labour Court Recommendation from June 2023 in respect of Medical Laboratory Scientists. This was implemented with effect 1 January 2024 and applied to those serving in the grade on that date. It does not apply to anyone who retired or resigned prior to the effective date.

A notional payscale is maintained for retirees prior to 1 January 2024 date so that they will continue to benefit from general round increases in their pension. This is in line with the policy of pay parity as set out in the Letter to Personnel Officers of 24 September 2024.

Pension Provisions

Questions (260)

Cian O'Callaghan

Question:

260. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation the reason he is the sole decision maker in pension appeals in circular 16/2020; the reason his Department does not engage directly with claimants during the appeals process; the reason published processing timelines differ from actual timelines; if he will ensure that where delays arise, including where expert input is required, his Department provides claimants with updates and revised timelines; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [68980/25]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy may be aware my department has overarching responsibly for public service pension policy including pension appeals. Circular 16/2020 titled ‘Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) procedure for pension appeals in relation to beneficiaries/disputed beneficiaries of pre-existing civil service pension schemes and of certain public service pre-existing pension schemes’ replaces all previous circulars/letters/guidance issued on pension appeals/IDR procedures relating to pre-existing schemes in the:

• the civil service, and

• the public service where it is specified in either the governing legislation establishing the body, or in the pension scheme rules, that I as Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation (or formerly Minister for Finance) am responsible for making the determination.

The circular does not grant a right of appeal to the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation (M/PER) where none exists, and it is noted that certain other public service schemes do not have a right of appeal to M/PER in respect of pension disputes. The circular simply lays out the procedure to be followed in cases where there is a route of appeal to M/PER set out in the relevant pension scheme rules and/or a body’s establishing legislation.

Given the quasi-judicial nature of the pension appeal process, and for impartiality reasons It is not possible to engage with appellants in relation to the outcome of their appeal while consideration of their appeal is ongoing. Section 7 of the circular states that:

“From the time a person commences the formal appeal process (see Stage 2 in appendix) until a determination has issued, the appellant should receive no communication either in writing or verbally to indicate the possible success or failure of their appeal. This approach is necessary given the quasi-judicial process involved…”

The circular provides an indicative timeline of three months for a Notice of Determination to issue from receipt of the full information required to assess an appeal.

In some cases, a longer timeline may be necessary. This can arise when there is a substantial volume of documentation submitted, where the matters being considered are particularly complex and/or where third-party advice is required. In addition, there are a large number of pension appeal cases on hand with my department at present which require detailed and careful consideration.

While it is not possible to provide appellants with revisions to the indicative timeline set out under the circular on an ad-hoc basis, I wish to advise that my department is committed to progressing pension appeals received to a conclusion in as short a timeframe as possible.

As outlined in Circular 16/2020 should an appellant have a query connected to this circular they can contact their relevant HR Unit.

Employment Rights

Questions (261)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

261. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department has examined the introduction of statutory pregnancy-loss leave for losses before 23 weeks; and the assessments carried out on cost, eligibility, expected uptake, and international best practice. [68756/25]

View answer

Written answers

On 09 July, the Government put forward a 12 month timed amendment to the Organisation of Working Time (Pregnancy Related Leave) Private Members Bill 2025 to allow for sufficient time to develop Government legislative proposals in line with the principles of the Bill. Policy development is currently at an early stage.

The Government fully recognises the significance of this policy area. The timed amendment is allowing Government time to thoroughly consider and assess the regulatory and policy implications of legislative proposals in line with the principles of the Bill.

Foreign Direct Investment

Questions (262)

Paula Butterly

Question:

262. Deputy Paula Butterly asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the work being carried out to promote market leading top of the line semiconductor manufacturing companies to begin manufacturing operations in Ireland; and the way in which the funding Ireland has or will receive under the EU Chips Act will be used to attract investment from these companies. [68532/25]

View answer

Written answers

With a significant semiconductor design and fabrication history, Ireland has built an extensive and technology-rich semiconductor industry comprising over 130 Irish-Owned and FDI companies, employing over 20,000 people, and making up part of a 175,000-person strong broader ICT sector with overall exports of €13.5 billion worth of products annually.

In this context, and in line with commitments in the Programme for Government, I launched Silicon Island: Ireland’s National Semiconductor Strategy in May 2025, as a clear signal of Government support for such an economically and strategically vital sector for both Ireland and the EU. Such a clear message of tangible support for the sector, the Government believes, is important to international investors, particularly coming at a time of international uncertainty, as well as in the context of other challenges, but also the opportunities arising for the sector as the world rolls out various AI and other technological innovations.

As I highlighted at the launch of our Strategy, a KPMG study identified that by 2040, with the right backing, Ireland could support up to 34,500 new semiconductor roles, and I believe Silicon Island is the Strategy that will enable us meet that opportunity. Accordingly, the Strategy includes a suite of deliverables owned by my Department, the Enterprise Agencies – IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland – and Tyndall National Institute, among others.

To this end, we will work with our partners in IDA Ireland to secure the development of:

• One leading-edge fabrication facility (Integrated Design Manufacturer or Foundry) in a regional location;

• Two trailing-edge foundries; and

• One advanced packaging facility.

To fulfil these ambitions, the Government is acutely aware of the strategic imperative to position Ireland as a competitive location for semiconductor fabrication facilities, which are critical to global supply chains and national economic resilience. Semiconductor fabrication plants, or “fabs”, require large sites due to their significant land use and the need for expansion space. The establishment of such advanced manufacturing operations requires substantial capital investment across several key infrastructure domains. Accordingly, the Programme for Government outlines a policy aim of expanding the IDA Ireland land bank, including consideration of new advanced manufacturing facilities in strategic, regional locations, and developing Next Generation Sites (NGS) with all of the necessary utilities and services to secure and accommodate a major semiconductor investment.

The NGS approach will be plan-led, streamlining development and reducing planning risks, and provide pre-permitted, utility-intensive sites, enabling swift development and certainty for investors. Each site will be developed in stages over several years to facilitate incremental investment in the necessary infrastructure. Funding for land acquisition for the first two sites, planned for the west and east of the country, is coming from my Department's capital allocation under the revised National Development Plan. A third site is planned for the south in future years.

It is important too that we encourage multinational companies to partner with Irish enterprise to foster a strong, mutually supportive sector. This will be achieved through close collaboration between IDA Ireland and Enterprise Ireland to strengthen linkages between the Agencies’ respective client bases within the semiconductor sector. This work will help local firms become embedded in the value chains of this strategic sector to develop a well-represented and self-sustaining ecosystem.

Enterprise Ireland is also leading on commercialisation support; access to finance; scaling of technology start-ups and spinouts; R&D and emerging technologies; enhanced R&D support for its clients in and associated with the sector. In this regard, Enterprise Ireland will also continue to ensure that its research and innovation programmes and supports are available and relevant to the semiconductor ecosystem, including in niche areas where Ireland and the EU can foster cross-sectoral opportunities including semiconductor technology as an enabling technology across sectors of strategic importance to Ireland and Europe such as quantum chips, advanced packaging (chiplets, heterogeneous packaging), neuromorphic chips, and sensors.

Enterprise Ireland is also focusing on activities to generate deep-tech spin-outs, leveraging its Commercialisation Fund, as well as the expertise of Tyndall National Institute’s Entrepreneurs in Residence programme. Over the past decade, Enterprise Ireland has funded a portfolio of Commercialisation Fund projects in Tyndall and will continue to support high-risk/high-reward spin-out projects with ongoing commercialisation support from assigned Enterprise Ireland Commercialisation Specialists.

It should also be noted that Irish SMEs, such as Mbryonics and Pilot Photonics, have recently received funding from the European Innovation Council (EIC) to allow for further scaling of their operations. Moreover, Ireland’s overall success in the Horizon Europe EIC programme, supported by Enterprise Ireland, highlights the innovation and capability of Irish semiconductor companies to compete on a global level. This funding provides the critical support required to enable these innovative semiconductor companies to develop and scale their businesses.

The Government is also working to harness the European Chips Act as a vehicle to further enhance the sector’s research, development, and innovation landscape and to increase Ireland’s capacity to produce semiconductor chips in support of the Act’s ambitions, building on Ireland’s existing strengths in the semiconductor sector and related ecosystem.

Utilising our fabrication and development bases built up over several decades through household names in the industry successfully operating from here, Ireland has already begun implementation of the European Chips Act.

Over €70 million in national and EU funding has been allocated for Tyndall’s participation in three EU Pilot Lines, strengthening links with leading semiconductor institutions like IMEC, Leti, and Fraunhofer. These pilot lines aim to bridge the gap between research and industrial deployment, as well as accelerating the development of advanced semiconductor technologies.

I-C3, the National Competence Centre for Semiconductors, has been established with Tyndall National Institute as co-ordinator and MIDAS Ireland, MCCI, UCD and NovaUCD as partners. I-C3 is one of 27 Chips Competence Centres across the EU being launched in 2025 as part of the European Chips Act. In that regard, I-C3 will provide SMEs, startups, and scale-ups with expertise and technological support to speed up innovation in the semiconductor sector.

Furthermore, Analog Devices is currently partnering with 14 EU Member States in the Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) on Microelectronics and Communication Technologies.

My Department will continue to seek opportunities from instruments such as IPCEI, and others like Horizon Europe, and the Digital Europe Programme, combining national and EU funding to maximise impact for the semiconductor ecosystem in line with the aims of Silicon Island.

The Government also recognises the global nature of semiconductor supply chains, and we are seeking to building partnerships and creating stronger linkages within the global industry. In this regard, Ireland is currently working with our European partners through the European Semiconductor Board, and as part of the European Semiconductor Coalition, on the successor to the European Chips Act which is due in 2026.

Work Permits

Questions (263)

William Aird

Question:

263. Deputy William Aird asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment if his Department will prioritise work permit applications for the diary sector given the time sensitive nature of the sector's labour needs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [68562/25]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland's employment permits system is designed to facilitate the entry of appropriately skilled non-EEA nationals to fill skills or labour shortages in the State in the short to medium term. This objective must be balanced by the need to ensure that there are no suitably qualified Irish or EEA nationals available to undertake the work and that the shortage is genuine.

The system is managed through the operation of the Critical Skills Occupation List and the Ineligible Occupations List which are subject to review. Each review takes account of research undertaken by SOLAS's Skills and Labour Market Research Unit and the Expert Group on Future Skills Needs and input from the Economic Migration Inter-Departmental Group which includes the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.

My department has received a submission from the agri-food sector with regard to the role of dairy farm assistant to the current review which closed to receipt of submissions on Friday, 19th of September. Consideration of submissions and evidence supporting changes is currently in progress including where occupations that currently have assigned quotas are undergoing review. The final recommendations from this review are expected to be published at the beginning of 2026.

The role of dairy farm assistant has been provided with a quota of 1,100 General Employment Permits since eligibility was first introduced in 2018. This quota was exhausted in November 2025.

Typically, quotas are not automatically extended when they are exhausted and further engagement from the sector is generally required. Where a sector wishes to have a quota extended, or a role fully removed from the ineligible occupations list (i.e. not subject to a quota), evidence should demonstrate a continuing need for access to employment permits for the role, supported by the department with lead responsibility for the sector.

My Department regularly engages with the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine in relation to the eligibility for employment permits and quotas affecting the sector.

It is important to note that employment permit policy is part of the response to addressing skills deficits which exist and are likely to continue into the medium term. It is not intended to act as a long term substitute for meeting the challenge of up-skilling Ireland’s resident workforce, and is instead focused on maximising the potential of EEA nationals to fill our skills deficits.

Food Labelling

Questions (264)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

264. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the steps being taken to ensure clear and accurate consumer information on meat products supplied to food service businesses and retail outlets; the oversight mechanisms for verifying origin, labelling and traceability; and the measures in place to prevent consumers being misled about the nature or source of meat products. [68742/25]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has responsibility for protecting consumers from misleading consumer practices under the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 2007.

However, my Department does not have responsibility for the issues raised by the Deputy, namely the oversight mechanisms for verifying origin, labelling and traceability of meat products.

Food labelling and the oversight of these matters generally falls under the remit of the Department of Health, as the Food Safety Authority, FSAI, has this responsibility. In relation to beef labelling this falls under the remit of the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine.

The FSAI has a guidance note on their website relating to the labelling of meat (including beef).

Construction Industry

Questions (265)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

265. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the specific productivity indicators his Department uses to evaluate the impact of State-funded innovation schemes in the residential construction sector, including Built to Innovate and Construct Innovate, and to confirm whether metrics such as output per labour hour, output per euro of State support, and time-to-completion benchmarks are currently in use; and if not, when such indicators will be established. [68900/25]

View answer

Written answers

My Department through Enterprise Ireland has supported the establishment of Ireland's first national Technology Centre for the construction sector "Construct Innovate", with a specific mandate to address housing related challenges and opportunities. My Department also enables the roll out of Enterprise Ireland's Built to Innovate package of productivity and innovation supports to the domestic residential construction sector, which has approved €6.8 million to date in grants to the sector.

The productivity indicators used to evaluate the impact of Built to Innovate suite of grant supports and the Construct Innovate Technology Centre, are summarised below:

Built to Innovate

Enterprise Ireland considers the following productivity metrics when evaluating significant Built to Innovate productivity funding applications:

reduced construction time and improved quality, including the reduction of snag lists,

projected growth in residential unit output from a base year (usually the last full financial year) to 3 years full financial years from that base year,

revenue growth per FTE employee on a similar timeline,

specific projected productivity improvements and additional cost savings through waste reduction (addressing the 8 wastes addressed in Lean projects).

Production time and quality are key Built To Innovate productivity measures, and they are commonly used in several industrial sectors. These measures are easily quantified, and they are indicators of production efficiency throughout the production cycle. Labour productivity is considered as a more general Built to Innovate measure. For example, factory systems on the site will drive site productivity through subcontractors, but these systems may not reduce the main contractor's site labour. Also, using increased offsite will reduce site labour, but increased offsite can be more costly, if sufficient productivity gains cannot be achieved in the factory.

Construct Innovate

Construct Innovate’s performance in relation to productivity is measured using key performance indicators. Each key performance indicator includes a target set for Year 5 of Construct Innovate’s contractual framework. These include; Associate/Patron Members, Transfer of Centre Staff to Companies, Knowledge Transfer Events, Core Funding for Current Projects, Core Funded Projects Commenced, Core Funded Projects Completed, Competitively Won Collaborative Research Funding Projects (measured both in number and in funding amount), Ancillary Centre Specific Objectives, and No. of Projects contributing to Climate Action and Sustainable Development Goals.

Construction Industry

Questions (266)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

266. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the methodology used by his Department to assess value-for-money in the allocation of more than €6.5 million under the Built to Innovate programme for residential construction productivity, including the performance criteria applied to participating firms and the evidence of productivity gains recorded to date. [68901/25]

View answer

Written answers

Enterprise Ireland's Built to Innovate programme of supports to the domestic residential construction sector offers different grant aid packages, subject to eligibility, across four areas:

• The Digital package supports the implementation of Industry 4.0, digitally enabled Lean systems to develop offsite manufacturing capability to increase output and produce more complex, higher value products.

• The Lean construction grant package is designed to deliver higher levels of on time and on budget project delivery, through implementing Lean methodologies onsite and the increased use of offsite and near site production.

• The Research & Innovation grant package is designed to support the development of products that will increase Pre-Manufactured Value (PMV), and reduce the embodied carbon, in residential construction.

• Finally, through the Sustainability package, Enterprise Ireland can support clients on their journey to sustainability through targeted grants that enable them to develop high impact carbon reduction plans.

Enterprise Ireland considers some, or all, of the following productivity metrics in the methodology for evaluating significant Built To Innovate productivity funding applications:

reduced construction time and improved quality, including the reduction of snag lists,

projected growth in residential unit output from a base year (usually the last full financial year) to 3 years full financial years from that base year,

revenue growth per FTE employee on a similar timeline,

specific projected productivity improvements and additional cost savings through waste reduction (addressing the 8 wastes addressed in Lean projects).

Production time and quality are key Built To Innovate productivity measures, and they are commonly used in several industrial sectors. These measures are easily quantified, and they are indicators of production efficiency throughout the production cycle.

Sales per employee are influenced by several factors such as, the product mix and the level of outsourcing. Therefore, labour productivity is considered as a more general Built To Innovate measure. For example, factory systems on the site will drive site productivity through subcontractors, but these systems may not reduce the main contractor's site labour. Also, using increased offsite will reduce site labour, but increased offsite can be more costly, if sufficient productivity gains cannot be achieved in the factory.

From March 2022 to June 2025, total Built To Innovate grants of €6.8m were approved for 45 companies. These companies included builder developers, main contractors, subcontractors, design teams and offsite manufacturers. On receipt of final claims from firms for Built To Innovate grants, productivity improvements are assessed.

Construction Industry

Questions (267)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

267. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the findings of the recent mid-cycle international evaluation of Construct Innovate carried out in November 2025, including the assessment of its productivity-related KPIs, its impact on residential construction delivery, and any recommendations for corrective actions. [68902/25]

View answer

Written answers

The Construct Innovate Technology Centre is currently operating under a five-year contractual framework with Enterprise Ireland, and is currently in year three. In line with the Centre's governance and funding structure, Enteprise Ireland commenced an independent international evaluation to assess that the Centre is working to its stated programme objectives and delivering to its industry mandate and KPIs.

Enterprise Ireland has received a draft report from the international expert panel on the mid-cycle international evaluation of Construct Innovate, conducted during November 2025, which is currently under internal review.

As part of the evaluation, the Centre presented an overview of its work programme and results to date to the expert international panel. The panel also met with key Government Departments, including my Department, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage; and the Centre Steering Commitee that comprises industry representatives; and also the industry Chair of the Centre Steering Committee. The expert panel also spoke with companies who had engaged with the Centre to garner feedback on what has worked well, and any suggestions for improvement.

Recommendations to Enterprise Ireland arising from the evaluation may be implemented over the remainder of the Centre's current five-year Phase, and are also taken into account by Enterprise Ireland in decision-making regarding the future operation and direction of the Centre at the conclusion of its first five years of operation.

Central Statistics Office

Questions (268)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

268. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the work undertaken with the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage and the Central Statistics Office since 2022 to develop residential-specific productivity data, including the collection of GVA, hours worked, and modern methods of construction output data separately from commercial construction, and the timeline for first publication of such statistics. [68904/25]

View answer

Written answers

Productivity statistics are published on an annual basis by the Central Statistics Office (CSO). Typical labour productivity statistics capture gross value added (GVA) per hour of work. The CSO does not calculate labour productivity for residential construction on its own because the data for such specific GVA and hours is lacking. The sectoral breakdown for construction, which is set down at EU level, does not differentiate between the construction of residential buildings and the construction of non-residential buildings. The latest CSO data (September 2025) shows that labour productivity for the Construction sector was €43.5 per hour in 2024, marginally higher than €43 per hour in 2023. Looking at the sub-sectors separately, for 2024 labour productivity stood at €35.5 per hour in Construction of Buildings (down from 39.9 in 2023), €33.4 per hour in Civil Engineering (up from €28 in 2023), and €53.9 per hour in Specialised Construction Activities (up from €49.6 in 2023).

According to the CSO, in 2024, 324 million hours of work were estimated for the construction sector, an increase of 10.4% on 2019 (pre-COVID), when 293.5 million hours were worked. CSO data shows that in the recent past, peak hours worked in the construction sector were in 2007, with an estimated 466 million hours worked. This dropped to a low of 141.5 million hours in 2012. Source: www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/fp/fp-cnap/constructionanationalaccountsperspective2024/productivity/

One of the actions in the Government's recently published Action Plan on Competitiveness and Productivity published by my Department in September 2025, is to prioritise increased construction sector productivity in national infrastructure and housing programmes, through further embedding supply and demand-side initiatives at design and procurement stages and strengthening industry capability through initiatives such as Enterprise Ireland’s 'Built to Innovate' and the Construct Innovate Technology Centre, and development of the national MMC Demonstration Park at Mount Lucas; maintaining a focus on digitalisation, sustainable practices, lean processes and adoption of MMC.

Business Supports

Questions (269)

Emer Currie

Question:

269. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment the number of companies who have participated in the digital for business consultancy scheme in each year since it was established to date in 2025; the cost of the scheme in each year; the number of companies targeted to participate in the scheme in 2026; and his plans to expand the focus or scope of the scheme. [68949/25]

View answer

Written answers

The Digital for Business programme was introduced as a pilot in 2022 under the name Digital Start. It is designed to help small businesses prepare and implement a plan for the adoption of digital tools and technology across their business. It offers up to three days of consultancy with a digital expert to help identify where these businesses are on their digital journey, then develop and implement a digital adoption plan to meet their specified need.

Due to positive feedback and the need for businesses to identify immediate benefits to digitalisation, the Digital for Business programme is now a prerequisite of the Grow Digital Voucher. This allows business owners to better identify the digital intervention their business needs and provides them with financial assistance to implement it.

The number of companies who have participated in the digital for business since it was established to date in 2025 and the value of the approvals in each year is set out in the table below:

Digital for Business approvals and costs 2022 - 2025

2022*

2023

2024

2025**

No. of Approvals

137

224

293

1040**

Value of Approvals

€573,822

€978,303

€1,170,612

€2,736,232**

* In 2022 the programme was introduced as the Digital Start programme.

**the figures reported for YTD are preliminary figures only and a full report on the LEO uptake of supports will not be performed until mid Q1 2026. (Figures provided - 01.01.2025 to 30.11.2025)

Since its introduction this support has assisted 1,694 small businesses to engage in an assessment of how Digitalisation can help them be more efficient and save them time and money. My Department anticipates a continuing high level of demand by LEO Clients for digitalisation supports and will set an ambitious target in order to meet demand for the Digital for Business programme in 2026.

A review of the full suite of LEO supports and schemes is currently out for tender and recommendations arising this review will be given due consideration and may lead to adjusting the focus or scope of the programme.

Share