Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 19 Feb 2026

Written Answers Nos. 189-208

Departmental Data

Questions (189)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

189. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade whether her Department has granted any form of recognition, accreditation, endorsement, or official status to the organisation (details supplied) ;whether any individual associated with that organisation has been authorised, formally or informally, to act in any diplomatic, consular, trade, representative, advisory, or quasi-diplomatic capacity on behalf of the State; whether her Department has at any time since 2015 provided funding, grants, sponsorship, financial assistance, logistical support, venue access, official branding approval, or any other material support to this organisation or to any entity associated with it; the total amount of public monies, if any, paid by her Department to this organisation or related entities in each year since 2015; whether this organisation has engaged in meetings, correspondence, or structured engagement with her Department or its officials; if so, the dates and nature of such engagement; and whether her Department has undertaken any assessment of the potential for public or international misunderstanding arising from the use by private organisations of diplomatic titles or terminology which may imply official State authority. [13761/26]

View answer

Written answers

My Department has no affiliation with the referenced website and has not provided any recognition, accreditation or support to it. The official website for my Department is www.ireland.ie, including for citizen services and international features relating to Ireland, while speeches, press releases and publications are made available on the section of www.gov.ie dedicated to the work of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Irish Aid

Questions (190, 191, 192, 193)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

190. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the aggregate proportion of Ireland’s Official Development Assistance in each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 that was retained by implementing partner organisations for programme support costs, overhead, administration, consultancy or management charges; and the blended effective overhead rate across total ODA expenditure for each of those years. [13886/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

191. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the total amount of funding provided in each of the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 through core contributions to multilateral organisations; the programme support cost percentage applied by each such organisation to Ireland’s contribution; and the resulting estimated monetary value of programme support costs deducted from those contributions in each year. [13887/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

192. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade whether her Department applies any benchmark, ceiling, or reference range in respect of acceptable administrative or overhead cost ratios when approving grants under Ireland’s Official Development Assistance programme; if not, the rationale for the absence of such benchmarks; and whether any funded programme in the years 2022, 2023 or 2024 exceeded internally assessed acceptable thresholds for overhead or programme support costs. [13888/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

193. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade the number of instances in the years 2022, 2023 and 2024 in which funding provided under Ireland’s Official Development Assistance programme was subject to financial correction, recovery, suspension, or clawback following audit or evaluation findings; and the total monetary value involved in each year. [13889/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 190 to 193, inclusive, together.

Ireland's international development programme, Irish Aid, focuses on providing support for those countries and communities most seriously in need, including those living in some of the world’s poorest or most climate-exposed countries, and those living in areas affected by conflict.

Given the variety of sectors, contexts and geographies in which Official Development Assistance (ODA) grant recipients operate, the Department does not apply generic thresholds for partners' administrative or overhead costs when awarding grants. Where appropriate, benchmarks or ceilings for administrative costs are instead applied at the level of individual grants or schemes. For example, under Ireland’s Civil Society Partnership for a Better World (ICSP), headquarters administration and programme quality costs are each eligible for funding up to a maximum of 6% of the total annual ICSP allocation.

Ireland provides core grants to trusted multilateral partners with which we share development and humanitarian priorities. Such core contributions amounted to €561.2 million in 2022, €629 million in 2023, and €703 million in 2024. These amounts include contributions to United Nations agencies, the World Bank and other multilateral organisations and Ireland's share of the European Union development cooperation budget.

Many multilateral organisations publish specific ‘Core Resources’ reports annually on the use of core funding, in addition to their annual reports. These core resources reports outline how multilateral organisations use core contributions to carry out their mandates. An example, UNICEF’s core resources report for 2024 is available at: www.unicef.org/reports/core-resources-annual-report-2024

These core contributions provide trusted multilateral organisations with essential flexibility and predictability, enabling them to prioritise their work effectively. It also serves as a foundation from which organisations can leverage additional earmarked funding to deliver targeted results for those most in need. Ireland’s core contributions are integral to advancing the Sustainable Development Goals and and supporting continuity of operations even during crises or disruptions.

In the case of the European Union, National Contributions’ by Member States are a condition of EU membership. The Department reports on the proportion of Ireland’s National Contributions to the EU which is categorised as ODA-eligible core contributions in accordance with the criteria and methodology established by the OECD Development Assistance Committee.

To ensure effective internal and external control, the Department’s independent Evaluation and Audit Unit provides objective assessment, assurance, advice in relation to the delivery of Ireland’s international development programme, as well as insight regarding corporate performance, governance, and risk management. The work of the Evaluation and Audit Unit is validated by an external Audit Committee.

Under the Department’s Counter-Fraud Policy, and as required by the terms and conditions of grant agreements signed, our funding partners are required to report all incidences of fraud and suspicions of fraud immediately. Partners are required to provide the Department with ongoing reports on all investigations into potential fraud. Figures in relation to fraud investigations in 2022, 2023 and 2024 are set out in tabular format below.

-

2022

2023

2024

Number of Frauds Investigated

4

4

6

Misappropriated Amount

8,144

14,063

11,924

Recovered Amount

8,144

14,063

11,924

Every effort is made to recover funds lost through fraud. All incidents of fraud by partner organisations investigated and closed from 2022 and 2024 were fully recovered.

Question No. 191 answered with Question No. 190.
Question No. 192 answered with Question No. 190.
Question No. 193 answered with Question No. 190.

Marine Protected Areas

Questions (194)

Paul Lawless

Question:

194. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment for an update on the Marine Protected Areas Bill; when the Bill will be published; whether Clew Bay, or areas within or adjacent to it, are being considered for designation as a marine protected area (MPA); to provide an update on any scientific assessments, surveys, or consultations that have been carried out to inform this designation; to outline the expected timeline for any proposed MPA designation and the process for public consultation; to clarify how local communities, including fishers and aquaculture operators, are being engaged in the process; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13728/26]

View answer

Written answers

On 12 November 2025, Government approved the preparation of a General Scheme for the Maritime Area Planning (Marine Protected Areas) (Amendment) Bill which will amend the Maritime Area Planning Act 2021. The Bill will provide a legislative basis for the designation and effective management of marine protected areas (MPAs) in Irish waters. Work on the general scheme is ongoing and it will be published at the earliest opportunity.

At present there are no specific sites identified for designation as MPAs in Ireland. However, the process to identify the species, habitats and ecosystem services (i.e. the benefits humans derive from the marine environment) is underway.

It is intended that future MPA sites provided for under the amended MAP Act will be informed by a series of Ecological Sensitivity Analyses undertaken by the Department and the MPA Advisory Group, with the added support of the MPA LIFE Ireland project (2024-2033). The first two such comprehensive assessments were completed in 2023 (western Irish Sea) and 2024 (Celtic Sea) respectively. A third such study is currently being established by the Department to cover Ireland’s Atlantic waters to the outer limits of Ireland’s maritime area.

These scientific undertakings take into account the best available evidence for a wide range of species, habitats and ecosystem services that merit protection. They are intended to result in initial identification of suitable areas within which potential MPAs may be possible in the future.

Ireland has an obligation under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) to achieve and maintain good environmental status in our maritime area. Among the measures laid down by the MSFD are spatial protection measures, including area-based conservation measures like MPAs that will contribute to the achievement of good status in our marine waters. This decision and its expected legislative outcome will further enable Ireland to meet its target of protecting 30% of the maritime area in an ecologically coherent manner by 2030.

The DMAP design process requires public consultation and this will be required for MPA DMAPs also. In addition to this the amending legislation will make provision for the Minister to seek the assistance of relevant scientific, socio-economic and cultural experts as well as sectoral and community stakeholder expertise to co-design MPA DMAPs when appropriate.

Inland Fisheries

Questions (195, 196)

John Brady

Question:

195. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment for an update on the appointment of a new CEO of Inland Fisheries Ireland; when they are expected to take post; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13429/26]

View answer

John Brady

Question:

196. Deputy John Brady asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment for an update on the external review into Inland Fisheries Ireland; when it is expected to be concluded and published; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13430/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 195 and 196 together.

The Programme for Government includes a commitment to carry out an independent review of Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI). I have written to the IFI Board signalling my intention that this review should commence once a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has been appointed and has been embedded in the Agency. This sequencing will ensure the review can draw upon the leadership of the incoming CEO and maximise the effectiveness of the review. This review will be carried out externally and it is intended that the terms of reference will be developed in due course as part of the engagement process.

While the appointment of a CEO is an operational matter for the Board of Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI), I can confirm that a recruitment process, managed by the Public Appointments Service on behalf of the IFI Board, has concluded. It is expected the new CEO will be appointed shortly, subject to the necessary approvals being obtained.

Question No. 196 answered with Question No. 195.

Legislative Process

Questions (197)

James Geoghegan

Question:

197. Deputy James Geoghegan asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment if he will outline each section of enacted legislation, where the responsibility lies in the Minister to commence that section, that has not been commenced; if he will outline each section of enacted legislation which provides for the making of regulations by the Minister that have not been made by the Minister; if he will outline all sections of enacted legislation or secondary legislation which provide for the publication of guidelines by the Minister that have not been published, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13500/26]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to confirm that I have asked officials to review all legislation within the Department to identify any uncommenced sections, if any. The information sought in the Question is being complied and my officials and will be forwarded to the Deputy in due course. I understand that my officials are engaging with the Deputy in relation to the scope of this request.

The following deferred reply was received under Standing Orders.
Letter and table sent to Deputy.

Climate Action Plan

Questions (198, 199)

Barry Ward

Question:

198. Deputy Barry Ward asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment the position regarding the publication of the Climate Action Plan 2026; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13516/26]

View answer

Barry Ward

Question:

199. Deputy Barry Ward asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment the position regarding the way in which the Climate Action Plan 2026 was completed; if stakeholders were engaged with; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13517/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 198 and 199 together.

This Government is committed to delivering on Ireland’s responsibility to address the climate crisis and work remains ongoing across Government Departments to carry out climate mitigation efforts every day. In addition, the rollout of retrofitting, renewable energy deployment, and more affordable electric vehicles continues at pace.

Ireland now has the lowest level of GHG emissions in 35 years which is notable given concurrent demographic and economic growth including an increase of approximately 1.5 million people, more than one million new homes and over one million extra vehicles on our roads.

We are making significant strides toward our target of 80% renewable energy by 2030 and we are now prioritising the development of offshore wind capacity. This Government has approved an unprecedented investment of €18.9 billion in Grid for the period 2026 – 2030 which is fundamental to the electrification of homes, businesses and transport. The 2025 ZEVI target for electrical vehicle sales of 195,000 was surpassed in October 2025 and I have just announced an unprecedented package of new and enhanced grants for homeowners across the country who are looking to benefit from home energy upgrades under the National Residential Retrofit Plan.

The Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy has undertaken detailed scrutiny on the Climate Change Advisory Council’s proposals for the Second Carbon Budget Programme. Due to delays in the formation of new Oireachtas Committees in 2025, the work of the Joint Committee, and the delivery of its report, took place later than expected.

This Report, delivered in October of last year, outlines 38 comprehensive recommendations spanning multiple sectors including electricity, transport, just transition, buildings, and agriculture, extending beyond the proposals themselves. The Committee’s report will need to be carefully considered before any further proposals are brought to Government and this will necessarily delay the next Climate Action Plan, in order to allow this process come to a conclusion.

Work has commenced on the next Climate Action Plan in anticipation of the outcome of this Carbon Budget Programme process and building on the work of the new Climate Action Plan Programme Board, established last year, with a view to bringing a draft to Government later this year.

It is my intention that the next Climate Action Plan will be a more targeted plan, focussing on strategic, realistic, high-impact actions that will be delivered over the course of the budget programme. It is also important that we focus on delivery both of existing and planned actions.

Question No. 199 answered with Question No. 198.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (200)

Barry Ward

Question:

200. Deputy Barry Ward asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment if his attention has been drawn to correspondence (details supplied) in relation to the Climate Action Plan 2026; if he will engage with this group in relation to their concerns; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13518/26]

View answer

Written answers

I can confirm that I have received the correspondence referred to by the Deputy from the group of academics and researchers regarding the preparation of the next Climate Action Plan in the context of the ongoing process for adopting the second Carbon Budget programme.

I want to acknowledge the significant expertise of the signatories and their ongoing contributions to the development of national climate policy, including their testimony to the Joint Committee on Climate, Environment and Energy last year and direct engagement following this with my Department on the budget proposals.

The Joint Committee has undertaken its detailed scrutiny on the Climate Change Advisory Council’s proposals for the Second Carbon Budget Programme and the delivery of its report took place later than expected. It did result in 38 wide-ranging recommendations that I am currently considering before any further proposals are brought to Government.

The carbon budgets have very significant implications for our economy and society. They need to be considered in the context of ensuring that affordability, competitiveness and energy security are paramount, particularly given the fast-paced evolving international geo-political landscape. In my view it is critical, therefore, that they are in place before finalising the next Climate Action Plan, as the plan is needed to address multiple budget periods. Sectoral Emissions Ceilings may also be revised once the updated Carbon Budget programme is adopted.

In the interim, Climate Action Plan 2025 in tandem with its predecessor, Climate Action Plan 2024, remains in place and provides a strong framework for continued delivery of climate action across all sectors, as many of its commitments are multi annual in nature. Work remains ongoing across Government Departments to deliver on these commitments and carry out climate mitigation efforts every day, supported by recently enhanced governance and delivery arrangements.

While I note the content of the letter relates to the plan itself, it is important to recognise the progress made by the Irish people and the plans, as well as funding, that are already in place to support Irelands climate objectives.

Ireland now has the lowest level of greenhouse gas emissions in 35 years which is notable given concurrent demographic and economic growth including an increase of approximately 1.5 million people, more than one million new homes and over one million extra vehicles on our roads. This Government is committed to delivering on Ireland’s responsibility to address the climate crisis and work remains ongoing across Government departments to carry out climate mitigation efforts every day: the rollout of retrofitting; renewable energy deployment; and more affordable electric vehicles continues at pace.

I can confirm to the Deputy that I remain focussed the delivery of our highest impact climate action measures, through our revised Climate Governance framework, and we will continue to pursue the achievement of our climate targets in line with our Programme for Government commitments.

Seaweed Harvesting

Questions (201)

Paul Lawless

Question:

201. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment the way in which Ireland’s circular economy policy and legislation apply to the harvesting of seaweed as a finite biological resource, rather than a manufactured input; whether the circular economy framework recognises the importance of natural regeneration capacity, harvesting cycles, and ecological carrying capacity for seaweed species commonly harvested in Ireland; whether any national guidance, limits, or sustainability thresholds exist in respect of regeneration rates, harvesting intensity, or recovery periods for seaweed beds; and if not, whether he considers such limits necessary to distinguish genuinely circular use from extractive activity; whether circular economy policy requires that proposals for large-scale seaweed harvesting take account of regeneration cycles traditionally measured over multiple years, cumulative impacts, and the long-term ability of the resource to replenish itself; the way in which these principles are being applied, in practice, to the assessment of large-volume harvesting proposals, including foreshore licence application FS006108, which proposes harvesting at a scale of up to 40,000 tonnes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13721/26]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland’s National Marine Planning Framework (NMPF), adopted in May 2021 brings together all marine-based human activities for the first time, outlining the Government’s vision, objectives, and marine planning policies for each marine activity. All public bodies and consenting authorities are required to have regard for the NMPF in exercise of their statutory functions. This is intended to ensure consistency, precautionary and evidence-based decision making across all Departments and agencies.

The NMPF sets out 3 key objectives in relations to seaweed harvesting which are to:

(i) support the sustainable harvesting of seaweed having regard to the important economic and social contribution it makes to coastal communities;

(ii) develop and maintain a fit for purpose regulatory framework that supports sustainable harvesting, ensures that key seaweed species which support multiple vital ecosystems are safeguarded, and respects existing formal and informal rights to harvest; and

(iii) support ongoing research to build on available data.

A key research project, led by the Marine Institute, entitled ‘A Socio-Economic Study of Seaweed Harvesting in Ireland’, provides baseline socio-economic information regarding seaweed harvesting activity and product usage in Ireland. The report is available at the following link:

emff.marine.ie/sites/default/files/bluegrowth/PDFs/Socioeconomic%20Study%20of%20Seaweed%20Harvesting%20in%20Ireland.pdf

The report also sets out a number of recommendations for consideration by industry and policy makers, including the development of a sustainable seaweed harvesting policy. Furthermore, pillar four of the Bioeconomy Action Plan 2023-2025 which was prepared jointly by the Department and the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, seeks to develop regenerative, transformative bioeconomy demonstration initiatives relating to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, fisheries, and aquaculture that supports a food and biobased system that is good for people, farmers, nature, and business.

In this context, the development of a seaweed policy, led by the most appropriate Government Department, would require significant inter-Departmental engagement and stakeholder consultation given the range of factors (social, economic and environmental) that would need to be considered.

With regard to the foreshore license application process, the enactment of the Maritime Area Planning Act, 2021 initiated the transition to a Maritime Regulatory Regime overseen by the Maritime Area Regulatory Authority (MARA). This has led to the gradual phasing out of operations under the Foreshore Act of 1933 (as amended), with new foreshore applications no longer accepted since the MARA’s establishment. Foreshore licence application FS006108 has been withdrawn from the Foreshore process and is no longer being progressed by my Department.

Since the establishment of MARA, applicants may apply to the Regulator for a licence to harvest seaweed, in accordance with Schedule 7 of the Maritime Area Planning Act 2021, which provides for Maritime Usages that may be undertaken pursuant to the granting of a Licence. MARA shall, before granting a licence, have regard to any environmental impacts arising and any Government policies that may affect or relate to the functions of MARA.

Climate Action Plan

Questions (202)

Paul Lawless

Question:

202. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment in view of the Climate Advisory Council’s estimate that Ireland could face up to €26 billion in costs if 2030 climate targets are missed, whether his Department has carried out a cost–benefit analysis comparing the actual fines, penalties, and compliance costs the State has incurred to date under EU or international climate obligations; the projected fines, penalties, and compliance costs the State may face if targets are not met; the costs and benefits of using the same or equivalent funding for domestic climate mitigation and adaptation projects; to provide the findings of any such analysis; to provide a breakdown of annual actual and projected expenditure, including best-case and worst-case scenarios, for EU or international climate-related fines or penalties; carbon credit purchases or carbon market compliance costs; payments to international carbon offset schemes; any other payments directly tied to meeting Ireland’s climate obligations; annual Exchequer allocations to domestic climate adaptation projects over the same period; an explanation for any gap between projected fines and domestic climate spending, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13724/26]

View answer

Written answers

The EU Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR) establishes for each EU Member State a national target for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions for the period 2021-2030. Since its revision in 2023 Ireland’s target to reduce emissions under ESR is 42% compared to 2005 levels by 2030.

Under the existing compliance arrangements, Member States can meet their targets through direct emissions reductions, as well as through additional compliance options provided for in the framework.

The framework does not provide for the imposition of direct fines or penalties, or the use of carbon credits or payments to international carbon offset schemes. However, it does allow for the purchasing of surplus allowances from overperforming Member States which could have significant costs. Estimating these costs requires working with significant data limitations as, at this point, there is no established market or set cost for allowances. This was noted by the Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC) and the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) in their report.

In relation to climate investment, including adaptation, the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation has been reporting the level of climate-related expenditure annually since 2019. Since 2024, this classification has considered a broader range of climate and environmental outcomes than emissions reductions alone, and now outlines the allocation of expenditure with an expected impact in relation to biodiversity, pollution, water and marine resources, the circular economy, and on adaptation and resilience. The identification and classification of expenditure is validated and updated every year before being published in the Revised Estimates Volume for Public Services (REV). All outputs of this work are publicly available on that Department’s website at gov.ie.

Water Safety

Questions (203)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

203. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment which agency has statutory responsibility for the installation, operation and maintenance of continuous monitoring infrastructure on major rivers. [13828/26]

View answer

Written answers

Last week, I welcomed the publication of the independent report carried out by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) which examined the State’s response to the fish kill incident that occurred on the Munster Blackwater in August 2025.

While the report confirms that State agencies responded quickly and appropriately once the incident was reported, it also identified areas where improvements can be made, including approaches to detection such as continuous real-time monitoring on major rivers.

There is no existing statutory requirement to provide continuous monitoring infrastructure on Irish rivers. Responsibility for water quality is assigned to a range of bodies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and Local Authorities, and monitoring responsibilities are aligned with their statutory functions. Decisions on how monitoring obligations are delivered is an operational matter for each body.

The recommendations set out in the JRC report are complex and will require detailed assessments and technical, operational and financial planning. They also need to be considered alongside existing arrangements to ensure that actions taken will complement and enhance existing monitoring programmes and systems rather than duplicate or replace them.

All recommendations will be considered. A structured approach to implementation will be developed in due course, to guide how recommendations are prioritised, progressed and funded.

Water Pollution

Questions (204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

204. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether his Department has conducted an assessment of Ireland’s current capacity to detect acute pollution events in real time; whether any gaps were identified following the Blackwater incident; and what corrective measures are now being implemented at policy level. [13829/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

205. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether he intends to establish a formal national “Major Fish Kill Emergency Protocol” setting out mandatory inter-agency leadership, immediate catchment-wide chemical sampling requirements, and defined response time targets; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [13830/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

206. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether his Department has reviewed the adequacy of enforcement provisions under the Environmental Liability Directive and the Industrial Emissions Directive in light of the inability to identify the pollutant or source in the Blackwater case; and whether legislative or regulatory amendments are under consideration. [13831/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

207. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether his Department has commissioned an economic valuation of the 2025 Blackwater fish kill, including ecological loss, recreational impact, and restoration costs; and whether such valuation will inform future deterrence and enforcement policy. [13833/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

208. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether additional restoration funding will be allocated to the Munster Blackwater catchment in light of the 2025 fish kill; and whether revised environmental objectives or accelerated recovery measures are being considered under the Water Framework Directive. [13834/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

209. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether he will publish a detailed implementation plan responding to the recommendations contained in the independent review of the 2025 Blackwater fish kill; and if he will provide a timeline for delivery of each recommendation. [13835/26]

View answer

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

210. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment whether his Department maintains data on the proportion of fish kill investigations since 2015 in which the pollutant or source remained undetermined; and whether policy reforms are being developed to reduce the incidence of undiagnosed cases. [13836/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 204 to 210, inclusive, together.

Last week, I welcomed the publication of the independent report carried out by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) which examined the State’s response to the fish kill incident that occurred on the Munster Blackwater in August 2025.

While the report confirms that State agencies responded quickly and appropriately once the incident was reported, it also identified areas where improvements can be made and where systems can be strengthened. It also highlighted a critical ‘detection gap’ which shows that early detection is essential, particularly in short-lived pollution events, and that detection is key to improving investigative and enforcement outcomes.

The JRC has provided a range of practical, forward-looking recommendations aimed at preventing, detecting and improving the coordinated response to future fish kills. Some recommendations can be implemented in the short term, including those aimed at strengthening how State agencies work together. An Inter-Agency Protocol Group has been established by Inland Fisheries Ireland (IFI) to coordinate this work, which is expected to be completed before the end of Q1 2026. While the operational elements of this protocol have yet to be developed, having a single agreed protocol for all agencies will ensure that the relevant expertise, resources and information are brought together quickly and will ensure consistency in how incidents are handled and communicated in the future.

The report also sets out a range of longer-term recommendations that will require detailed assessments and technical, operational and financial planning. These recommendations, which include strengthening of early-warning and detection monitoring systems and restoration measures to improve catchment resilience, also need to be considered alongside existing arrangements, in particular measures addressing EU obligations such as the Water Framework Directive, the Environmental Liability Directive and the Industrial Emissions Directive, to ensure that actions taken will complement and enhance existing systems rather than duplicate or replace them.

All recommendations set out in the JRC report will be considered. A structured approach to implementation will be developed in due course, to guide how recommendations are prioritised, progressed and funded.

Data on the sources of fish kills is not maintained by my Department. Collated data on fish kill events in Ireland from 1969 to 2022 has been published by IFI at: www.fisheriesireland.ie/sites/default/files/2024-08/ifish-volume-3-fish-kills-1969-to-2022_final_0.pdf

Question No. 205 answered with Question No. 204.
Question No. 206 answered with Question No. 204.
Question No. 207 answered with Question No. 204.
Question No. 208 answered with Question No. 204.
Share