Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 5 Mar 2026

Written Answers Nos. 413-433

Tax Data

Questions (413)

Darren O'Rourke

Question:

413. Deputy Darren O'Rourke asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 854 of 17 February 2026, the legal basis upon which home tutors engaged under the home tuition grant scheme are “classed as self-employed (PRSI Class S)” as a general position (details supplied); whether he will identify the employer in law for PRSI purposes in such cases; whether any administrative agreement or practice is being relied upon to maintain a dual classification that is, employee for PAYE collection but self-employed for PRSI/auto-enrolment exclusion; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17961/26]

View answer

Written answers

The purpose of the Home Tuition Scheme, operated by the Department of Education and Youth (DEY), is to provide a compensatory educational service for children who, for a number of reasons such as chronic illness, are unable to attend school. Parents or legal guardians engage tutors in a private arrangement. The Department of Education and Youth act as a payroll agent to facilitate deductions at source.

In June 1998, Scope Section, of the Department of Social Protection, determined that home tutors were insurable at class S. This decision was subsequently upheld by the Appeals Office in July 1999.

In August 2013, the Department of Education requested a determination regarding the correct PRSI to be applied to tutors on the Home Tuition Scheme. The Department confirmed its previous decision that home tutors are insurable at class S.

In July 2025, Scope Section, at the request of an individual working as a home tutor, examined their insurability and determined that the individual home tutor was insurable at class S. The decision applied the framework as provided for in the Code of Practice for Determining Employment Status, this framework was established in the Supreme Court ‘Karshan’ ruling. This decision has been appealed to the Social Welfare Appeals Office. A decision is awaited. Persons paying PRSI class S are not enrolled in MyFutureFund.

In May 2024, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) issued an adjudication in respect of a Home Tutor. This decision was appealed to the Labour Court and in September 2025 the Labour Court confirmed the decision of the WRC that the worker was not an employee of the Department of Education and Youth. This decision aligns with the Scope decision.

Social Welfare Payments

Questions (414)

Niamh Smyth

Question:

414. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will review correspondence (details supplied); if he will provide an update on the person’s application; the timeframe for a payment to issue; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17985/26]

View answer

Written answers

Working Family Payment (WFP), formerly Family Income Supplement, is a weekly in-work support which provides an income top-up for employees on low earnings with children. To qualify for Working Family Payment the customer must be working a minimum of 38 hours per fortnight in ongoing insurable employment and have at least 1 qualified child who normally resides with them.

The person concerned submitted an application for Working Family Payment on 19 June 2025. This application for WFP was disallowed on 24 October 2025. The decision was appealed to the Social Welfare Appeals Office on the 8 December 2025. On the 6 February 2026 the appeal was allowed in favour of the person concerned.

We are in the process of applying the Appeals Officer's decision and will be in contact with the person concerned shortly.

Tax Data

Questions (415)

Mairéad Farrell

Question:

415. Deputy Mairéad Farrell asked the Minister for Social Protection further to Parliamentary Question No. 760 of 10 February 2026, if any internal briefing notes, guidance documents, policy papers, emails, memoranda or tracking systems exist within his Department concerning the enforcement, monitoring or recovery of retrospective PRSI liabilities arising from Scope decisions (details supplied); whether any records exist documenting engagement with the Revenue Commissioners regarding the operational interaction between Scope determinations and the Karshan Disclosure Opportunity; if such records exist, whether he will reconcile their existence with FOI-2026-28668, which stated that no such records exist; if no such records exist, to explain how full-period enforcement and tracking of PRSI liabilities is operationalised in practice; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17986/26]

View answer

Written answers

FOI 2026-28668 requested internal legal advice, guidance or correspondence concerning the application of the Karshan judgment to employment status determinations in respect of a specific company. The response to the FOI confirmed that no such records exist in relation to Karshan judgement and this company. In addition the FOI concerned pension entitlements of workers in this company. Occupational pension entitlements and eligibility do not fall within the remit of DSP and the FOI reply confirmed that such records do not exist.

The Department is aware of the Karshan Disclosure Opportunity guidance issued by the Revenue Commissioners. The Department understands that Revenue is providing employers with an opportunity to correct, without interest or penalties, any payroll tax, USC and PRSI issues in respect of 2024 and where relevant, 2025, arising from bona-fide classification errors following the Supreme Court judgement of 2023.

The settlement terms advised by Revenue make it clear that they “do not apply to any intervention which was open prior to 20 October 2023. Furthermore, they do not apply to any individual who, under the Code of Practice on Determining Employment Status in effect prior to October 2023, should have been classified as an employee. Likewise, they do not apply to any individual who should have been classified as an employee based on any published decision or determination of the Department of Social Protection, the Workplace Relations Commission, the Tax Appeals Commission or a court. As such, where Revenue is of the opinion that the misclassification has arisen from either careless or deliberate behaviour, the full liability to Income Tax, USC and PRSI and interest and penalties will be pursued as provided for under the terms of all relevant legislation.”

The closing date for employers to avail of the disclosure opportunity was the 30 January 2026. The Department will be engaging with Revenue on the correction of relevant employee PRSI records when the applications have been processed by Revenue.

It is always open to any worker who has concerns in relation to their PRSI classification to contact the Department’s Scope section.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (416)

Pádraig Rice

Question:

416. Deputy Pádraig Rice asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason that jobseeker's allowance is means-tested for couples who are cohabiting; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18059/26]

View answer

Written answers

The purpose of the means test on certain welfare payments is to ensure that resources are directed to those with the greatest need for income supports by the State.

The rules contained in Schedule 3 of the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act 2005, as amended, provide that for means-tested social assistance schemes, all income and assets belonging to the applicant, and his or her spouse/partner where applicable, are assessable for means-testing purposes.

Couples living together in a household can be assumed to pool resources, at least to some extent. This assumption means the delivery of income support must take account of total household means, rather than just the means of the claimant, in determining how to target income support.

The same rationale is apparent in the rate structure for the majority of social welfare payments – the headline payment rate made to the second adult in the household is almost always lower, usually set at two thirds of the primary claimant’s maximum rate. The IQA rate structure and the means test both take account of household circumstances.

If a person’s spouse, civil partner or cohabitant works, their weekly earnings are assessed in line with the legislation governing means-tested payments.

Social Welfare Benefits

Questions (417)

Pádraig Rice

Question:

417. Deputy Pádraig Rice asked the Minister for Social Protection if his Department has considered options to maintain insurability for PhD scholarship holders, such as PRSI credits, so that eligibility for jobseeker's allowance can be sought after State-supported doctoral study; the outcome of any such analysis; the timeframe for a decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18060/26]

View answer

Written answers

Persons in full time education, including those studying for a PhD, can maintain their social insurance record so they can continue to be eligible for social insurance benefits in two ways, either through credited employment contributions (credits) or voluntary contributions.

The primary purpose of credits is to preserve the continuity of a person’s insurance record during periods when they are unable to work and pay social insurance contributions in the normal way.

Similar to other schemes operated by the Department, there are qualifying conditions which must be met before a person can be awarded credits. In order to qualify for credits, absences from work would have to arise due to notified incapacity for work, proven unemployment, periods during which the person was in receipt of certain other social welfare payments or a period spent as a full-time student.

A student who has completed a course of full-time education and re-enters insurable employment may have an entitlement to student credits. A person may be awarded student credits if:

• they commenced the course before they reach the age of 23 years;

• the course was full-time;

• they re-enter insurable employment at PRSI Class A.

Student credits can only be awarded once. Student credits provide coverage for Illness Benefit, Health and Safety Benefit, Jobseeker's Benefit, Jobseeker's Pay-Related Benefit, Maternity Benefit, Adoptive Benefit, Paternity Benefit and Treatment Benefit.

A person under the pensionable age of 66 or a person born on or after 1 January 1958 who is aged between 66 and 70 years of age and who has not been awarded the State Pension (Contributory), who ceases to be covered by compulsory social insurance, either as an employee or as a self-employed person, may opt to become insured on a voluntary basis and pay voluntary contributions, provided certain contribution conditions are satisfied. Voluntary contributions act to maintain a person’s established social insurance record in respect to eligibility for State pensions in the future. Based on the person's contribution history the voluntary contribution scheme may provide coverage for State Pension (Contributory), Bereaved Partner’s (Contributory) Pension and Guardian's Payment (Contributory).

It should be noted, however, that credits and voluntary contributions allow an insured contributor to maintain entitlement to contribution based benefit payments, not means tested allowance payments such as Jobseeker's Allowance.

Any expansion beyond the scope of the credited employment or voluntary contributions options would need to be considered in the wider policy and budgetary context.

I trust this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Pension Provisions

Questions (418)

Malcolm Byrne

Question:

418. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Social Protection the conditions for mutual recognition of pension contributions between Ireland and Canada; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18077/26]

View answer

Written answers

Ireland has negotiated a number of Bilateral Social Security Agreements including with Canada (SI 317/1991) and Quebec (SI 120/1995).

The main purpose of these Agreements is to protect the pension rights of people who have worked and paid social security contributions in Ireland and the countries with which Ireland has such agreements. This is achieved by allowing reckonable social security contributions paid in Canada or/and Quebec to be aggregated with Irish full-rate social insurance contributions for the purposes of qualifying for certain contributory payments in Ireland or in Canada/Quebec, where they do not meet minimum requirements in one country alone.

Enquiries on Irish state pensions can be directed to Social Welfare Services, College Road, Sligo by email to: state.con@welfare.ie or by phone to: 071-9157100 / 0818-200400.

If the Deputy is referring to a particular case and provides my office with details, I will have the matter examined.

Departmental Staff

Questions (419)

Ged Nash

Question:

419. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Social Protection if his Department plans to engage staff from the private sector who work in accountancy and corporate law firms to work in his Department during the course of the upcoming EU Presidency term; the terms under which such staff will be engaged; the number of staff his Department plans to hire; the measures planned to guard against potential conflicts of interest between his Department and parent companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18093/26]

View answer

Written answers

My Department does not intend to engage staff from Accountancy, legal or consultancy firms on contracts for service, retainer contracts or otherwise to assist with Ireland's preparations for the Presidency of the Council of EU Ministers.

Pension Provisions

Questions (420)

Timmy Dooley

Question:

420. Deputy Timmy Dooley asked the Minister for Social Protection the reason a contributory pension (details supplied) is being reduced due to early teaching years of 1974-1978/1979 is being treated differently from all subsequent years of teaching contributions therefore creating a gap in the contribution record. [18158/26]

View answer

Written answers

The person concerned reached pension age on 20 April 2021. An application for State pension (contributory) was received from them on 12 October 2023.

An interim decision letter issued on 18 December 2023 awarding the standard State Pension (contributory) with effect from 12 April 2023, 6 months backdating from the date of application as provided for in legislation. The records showed 536 full-rate contributions giving a yearly average of 11 and an entitlement to 40% of the maximum rate of pension. They were advised a final decision would issue once their record had been fully verified.

Their modified contribution record, when confirmed, resulted in a reclassification of five years of full-rate contributions (from 2008 to 2012) to modified rate contributions. In cases of overlapping contributions, contributions from primary employment take precedence over subsidiary employment for the purposes of the calculation of pension entitlement. The modified contributions therefore take precedence over the full-rate contributions in this case.

As such, their full-rate contributions fell to below the 520 needed to qualify for the standard State pension (contributory). Prior to a decision being made, a letter issued to the person concerned on 14 October 2025 to advise them of this and of their revised rate of entitlement to a pro-rate mixed insurance pension - 12.77% of the maximum rate of pension. A revised decision letter issued on 12 November 2025 advising that their payment was being reduced with effect from 21 November 2025.

While the social insurance system changed to the current pay-related social insurance system with effect from April 1979, modified-rate contributions before and after this time are treated the same in pension calculations, with only the name of the classes being different.

Legislative Process

Questions (421)

Liam Quaide

Question:

421. Deputy Liam Quaide asked the Minister for Social Protection the average timeframe in 2025 for the finalisation of a Section 318 review under the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act 2005. [18227/26]

View answer

Written answers

The number of Section 318 reviews requested each year is relatively low and tends to track overall appeal volumes. For example, 168 reviews under Section 318 were registered in 2025 representing about 0.3% of 52,000 appeals finalised in that year. The average timeframe in 2025 for the finalisation of a Section 318 review under the Social Welfare (Consolidation) Act 2005 was 40 weeks.

Under Section 318 of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act 2005, the Chief Appeals Officer may, at any time, revise any decision of an appeals officer, where it appears that the decision was incorrect by reason of some mistake having been made in relation to the law or the facts.

A request for a Section 318 review can be made in writing by the appellant after they receive their initial appeal decision or may also be requested by the relevant scheme area of the Department. There is no fixed statutory time limit for completing a Section 318 review. Reviews are carried out on a case-by-case basis and the length of time can depend on the complexity of the case and the contentions raised. The issues that may be raised in such cases can be varied in nature and can also be legally and/or factually complex.

In addition, Section 318 reviews can be sought in conjunction with wider legal proceedings and in some cases cannot progress while these proceedings are ongoing. As a consequence there is no standard time to analyse and assess Section 318 cases. Given these factors and also the relatively low volume of Section 318 cases, average processing times are not a reliable indicator of productivity or efficiency.

Until recently Section 318 cases could only be considered from commencement to completion by the Chief Appeals Officer herself. Given the other responsibilities of the Chef Appeals Officer, including organisation and management of the appeals service itself, this created a single pinch point in the process for section 318 cases. To address this, new regulations (S.I. No. 744 of 2024) came into effect from Monday, 28 April 2025 to, among other things, provide for other officers to undertake the preparatory analysis of cases up to and including a recommendation in respect of section 318 cases. While all cases must continue to be determined by the Chief Appeals Officer this change is intended to allow faster turnaround, particularly of less complex cases.

The Chief Appeals Officer continues to monitor processing times and significant efforts are being made to reduce the time taken to process all appeals as well as reviews under Section 318.

An Garda Síochána

Questions (422)

Holly Cairns

Question:

422. Deputy Holly Cairns asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of gardaí assigned to road policing in Cork from 2014 to date in 2026, by local station, in tabular form; [17902/26]

View answer

Written answers

An Garda Síochána play a vital role in enforcing road traffic law and in making our roads safer for all road users, including vulnerable road users. Road traffic laws are enforced by Gardaí assigned to Roads Policing and as part of the day-to-day duties of uniformed Gardaí nationwide. This includes a programme of high-visibility road safety and enforcement operations carried out in partnership with other state agencies.

The Garda Commissioner is responsible for the management and administration of An Garda Síochána under section 33 of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024, which includes the distribution and stationing of Gardaí throughout the State and Garda policies.

An Garda Síochána publishes figures in relation to the allocation of Gardaí nationally. This includes a breakdown of Gardaí assigned to Roads Policing by Garda Division from 2014 to the end of January 2026, the latest date for which figures are available. This can be found at the following links:

2014-2025[www.garda.ie/en/about-us/our-departments/human-resources-and-people-development/garda-hr-directorate/garda-strength-breakdown-2025/garda-strength-breakdown-2025.html]

2026

[www.garda.ie/en/about-us/our-departments/human-resources-and-people-development/garda-hr-directorate/garda-strength-breakdown-2026/january-2026.html]

The Deputy should select the most recent date and then select the file titled ‘Roads Policing by division 2014 to the most recent date" to access a breakdown of Gardaí assigned by Division.

Passport Services

Questions (423, 424)

Paul Nicholas Gogarty

Question:

423. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if it is common practice to refuse to issue statements of reckonable residency by post when requested by the passport office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17903/26]

View answer

Paul Nicholas Gogarty

Question:

424. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the reason a request by a person (details supplied) for a statement of reckonable residency was sent by email on multiple occasions rather than posted as requested given that this was a demand from the Passport Office; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17905/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 423 and 424 together.

I understand that the Deputy has been in contact with my Department's Immigration Oireachtas service and that the matters raised have been resolved.

I can advise the Deputy that each request is examined individually by my Departments applicant support team and facilitated where possible.

As an Oireachtas member, you can also request the status of individual immigration cases by e-mail, using the Oireachtas Mail facility at: IMoireachtasmail@justice.ie, which has been specifically established for this purpose. This service enables up to date information on such cases to be obtained without the need to seek information by way of the Parliamentary Question process.

Question No. 424 answered with Question No. 423.

An Garda Síochána

Questions (425)

Matt Carthy

Question:

425. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of staff currently employed by Fiosrú, the Police Ombudsman; the percentage of those staff who previously served as members of An Garda Síochána; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17909/26]

View answer

Written answers

I am informed that there are currently 182 staff employed by Fiosrú, Office of the Police Ombudsman.

Of this, 3% of Fiosrú staff previously served as members of An Garda Síochána. The average number of years since these staff members served as members of An Garda Síochána is 9 years.

Under the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024, Fiosrú is an independent statutory body fully independent in its investigative and operational functions

Courts Service

Questions (426)

Niamh Smyth

Question:

426. Deputy Niamh Smyth asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to provide an update on the opening of Carrickmacross Courthouse for operation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17943/26]

View answer

Written answers

Management of the courts, including matters related to the administration of the courts and provision of accommodation for court sittings, is the responsibility of the Courts Service, which, under the provisions of the Courts Service Act 1998, is independent in exercising its functions. In order to be of assistance to the Deputy, I have had enquiries made with Courts Service regarding the status of Carrickmacross Courthouse.

I am advised that Carrickmacross Courthouse has been refurbished to allow sittings to resume there when required. Extensive maintenance works have been carried out throughout the period of inactivity, including repainting the interior and improving the heating system. Work is underway to enhance the courtroom technology.

Certain sittings were held in the venue in 2025, pending the full ICT upgrade. Some circuit court sittings have been scheduled for Autumn 2026, and I am further advised by the Courts Service that there is now no impediment to courts sitting there in the meantime, subject to judicial approval.

Naturalisation Applications

Questions (427)

Michael Cahill

Question:

427. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to provide a paper application for naturalisation to a person who cannot use the online system (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [17964/26]

View answer

Written answers

I can inform the Deputy that a paper application form will issue to the person concerned at that specified address.

I wish to advise the Deputy that due to the administrative nature of paper-based applications, it will take longer to process than an online digital application.

Once an application is submitted, applicants can use the Immigration Service’s Customer Service Portal to check the status of their immigration applications and raise any further related queries. They can register for, or log in to their existing account, at: www.portal.irishimmigration.ie/en/.

As an Oireachtas member, you can also request a paper application form be provided by using the Oireachtas Mail facility at: IMoireachtasmail@justice.ie.

Policing Authority

Questions (428, 429, 430)

Aidan Farrelly

Question:

428. Deputy Aidan Farrelly asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if the Garda Commissioner and his leadership teams in the Garda and or Fiosrú, have provided him with the policy on use of taser, in line with similar Garda policies that is the incapacitant spray policy which are publicly available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18064/26]

View answer

Aidan Farrelly

Question:

429. Deputy Aidan Farrelly asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if the Garda Commissioner or his leadership teams, the Garda and or Fiosrú, has provided him with the policy on the Garda use of force policy, in line with similar Garda policies such as the incapacitant spray policy which are publicly available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18065/26]

View answer

Aidan Farrelly

Question:

430. Deputy Aidan Farrelly asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if the Garda Commissioner and his leadership teams the Garda and or Fiosrú, has provided him with the protocol, if any exists for cases in which an individual is seriously injured, or dies following taser use, whether immediately after a taser is issued or from the effects of a taser for example due to a head injury after falling; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18066/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 428, 429 and 430 together.

An Garda Síochána is committed to a human rights based approach to policing and provides general guidance to Gardaí on how human rights are to be upheld daily in the course of their work. Their response to any incident involves a graduated policing response considering relevant legislation and public safety, with enforcement as a last resort.

In carrying out their duties, our Gardaí, as far as practicable, consider non-physical means before resorting to the use of force in the resolution of incidents that they respond to. We must rely on Garda operational management and frontline Gardaí to use their discretion and judgment.

The Garda Commissioner is responsible by law for the management and administration of An Garda Síochána, including the policies and guidelines in place within An Garda Síochána and publication of same. As Minister, I have no role in these independent functions.

Conductive Energy Devices (also known as “tasers”) are issued to specialist firearms and protection units. An Garda Síochána are also trialling the use of tasers by a limited number of frontline Gardaí in stations in Dublin City and Waterford where body worn cameras have already been deployed.

Each Garda in the pilot who is equipped with a CED has undertaken a comprehensive 3-day training course in the use of the CEDs before being authorised to carry these devices on operational duties. They have also attended an additional half day human rights awareness briefing.

The 3-day Taser Training Course is grounded in Irish Constitutional and European Convention on Human Rights principles and Garda policy, Garda Decision Making Model, Garda Code of Ethics in addition to practical training and assessments.

The objective of the CED pilot is to evaluate the operational, ethical, human rights, and community impacts of deploying CEDs as an additional tactical option within a graduated use of force framework, in order to prevent harm to Garda personnel and members of the public.

Since the pilot began on 18 December last, I am advised that Gardaí involved in the pilot have not used a CED. The devices have been drawn on three occasions, two in Dublin and one in Waterford, where they led to the successful de-escalation of the situation without the need for any use of force.

In order to ensure appropriate oversight any use of a CED will be referred to Fiosrú, the Office of the Police Ombudsman. Fiosrú have not received any such referrals since the commencement of the pilot.

A new overarching Garda Use of Force Policy is being developed currently and is at an advanced stage. Once complete this will be made available on the Garda website.

The sub-procedure documents relating to this policy will be restricted documents and will only be available internally. These would include guidelines as to the use of CEDs. This is in line with internal Garda policy procedures.

Information on Garda use of force including the use of incapacitant spray, ASP Baton and CEDs are published on the Garda website and in the Commissioner's monthly report to the Policing and Community Safety Authority.

An Garda Síochána's Use of Force statistics can be found at the following link:

www.garda.ie/en/information-centre/statistics/.

While the Garda Commissioner's monthly reports to the PCSA can be found here:

www.garda.ie/en/about-us/publications/general-reports/commissioner-s-monthly-reports-to-policing-and-community-safety-authority/.

Question No. 429 answered with Question No. 428.
Question No. 430 answered with Question No. 428.

Departmental Staff

Questions (431)

Ged Nash

Question:

431. Deputy Ged Nash asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if his Department plans to engage staff from the private sector who work in accountancy and corporate law firms to work in his Department during the course of the upcoming EU Presidency term; the terms under which such staff will be engaged; the number of staff his Department plans to hire; the measures planned to guard against potential conflicts of interest between his Department and parent companies; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18090/26]

View answer

Written answers

I can confirm that my Department has no plans to engage staff from the private sector to work on matters relating to Ireland’s Presidency of the Council of the European Union.

Prison Service

Questions (432)

Donna McGettigan

Question:

432. Deputy Donna McGettigan asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the level of overcrowding in Limerick prison that is, the capacity of the prison, the current number of prisoners held there either on remand or serving sentences, whether our prisons are in breach of international regulations or Government targets; the steps he will take to alleviate any overcrowding; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18097/26]

View answer

Written answers

I am, and the government as a whole is, acutely aware of the capacity constraints in our prisons and the resulting challenges faced by those who work and live in our prisons. As well as increasing prison capacity, I am committed to progressing and implementing policies aimed at increasing the use of community sanctions that seek to reduce offending, divert people away from imprisonment, and provide effective rehabilitation.

The Irish Prison Service (IPS) must accept into custody all people committed to prison by the Courts and has no control over the numbers committed to custody at any given time. The IPS has confirmed that information regarding prison capacity and the numbers of prisoners in custody is collated daily by the IPS Statistics Unit and published on its website (www.irishprisons.ie). This information can be found in the Information Centre under Statistics & Information, Daily Prisoner Population.

A record capital investment of €527 million is being provided to IPS over the next 5 years, of which €495 million will be invested in building projects to further increase capacity. The IPS is delivering one of the most significant capital programmes in the justice sector, reflecting the Government’s commitment to increase prison capacity and modernise the estate in line with population growth, with an overall target of delivering over 1,500 spaces by 2031. This includes a large extension to the existing Cork Prison on the site of the old, decommissioned Cork Prison, a new block in Wheatfield, an additional block extension at Midlands prison, and additional spaces at Castlerea, Mountjoy, Cloverhill, Portlaoise and the Dóchas centre.

Since 2024, 232 spaces have been constructed across the Prison Estate, with 126 constructed in 2024 and 106 constructed in 2025. The majority of these spaces are in use, with the remainder coming on stream very soon. There are plans to build another 65 spaces in 2026.

I am also committed to progressing and implementing policies aimed at increasing the use of community sanctions, that seek to reduce offending, divert people away from imprisonment, and provide effective rehabilitation. Budget 2026 provides for a 13% increase in funding for the Probation Service. This additional funding will be used to increase use of supervised community sanctions in the criminal courts, expand restorative justice services, and expand supervised temporary release schemes nationally.

On 9 January, I published the Criminal Law and Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provision) Bill, which completed second stage on 22 January 2026. The Bill proposes amendments to the Community Service Act 1983 to support and encourage greater use of Community Service Orders (CSOs). It includes an amendment to oblige the courts to consider a CSO in lieu of a prison sentence of up to 24 months’ duration (the current such threshold being 12 months) and to give reasons where they consider that a CSO should not be imposed in such a case. It will further amend sections 3 and 5 of the 1983 Act to increase the maximum community service hours that a judge may order from 240 to 480.

Work is also underway to develop a pilot bail support policy for women as an alternative to being detained in custody while awaiting trial or sentencing.

The Programme for Government also commits to implement electronic tagging for appropriate categories of prisoner. Under Budget 2026 funding of €2.1 million was allocated for the project to allow for staffing, procurement, and other set-up costs. A pilot is expected to be operational in 2026.

The capacity of Limerick Prison (Male) is 338 and Limerick Prison (Female) is 56. On 2 March 2026, there were 422 prisoners in custody in Limerick Prison (Male) and 92 in Limerick Prison (Female).

The Government made significant capital funding available to the IPS to enhance the existing infrastructure and provide additional capacity through the redevelopment of Limerick prison, including building a new women’s prison to replace the old women's wing which dated from 1821. This project was delivered in 2023 at a cost of €70.1 million.

The Irish Prison Service continues to assess opportunities to identify and utilise additional capacity within the existing estate, including through the optimisation or repurposing of accommodation where appropriate. Any such increases will be reflected in the daily population figures published on the IPS website.

Sports Funding

Questions (433)

Michael Cahill

Question:

433. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to provide a detailed up-to-date progress report on an application by the Kerry County Board for significant funding under the IIP scheme in respect of the Kerry GAA Centre of Excellence in Currans; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [18118/26]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister, I do not comment on individual Immigrant Investor Programme (IIP) applications.

My Department is committed to ensuring that all applications will be examined on their own merits and will endeavour to conclude all decisions in a timely manner. If a project owner has any queries, they can contact the IIP Unit of my Department directly.

Share