Skip to main content
Normal View

Forestry Sector

Dáil Éireann Debate, Wednesday - 25 March 2026

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

Questions (252, 253, 254, 255, 256)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

252. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the co-ordination that exists between his Department and electricity infrastructure operators to mitigate the risk of fallen trees damaging power lines during storms. [22720/26]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

253. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine the assessment that has been undertaken regarding the impact of proposed 20-metre vegetation clearance corridors around electricity infrastructure on land available for afforestation. [22721/26]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

254. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine whether the requirement for wider electricity line corridors will reduce the overall area eligible for afforestation under the Forestry Programme 2023-2027. [22722/26]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

255. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if his Department has engaged with ESB Networks and other relevant agencies regarding how forestry policy will adapt to new infrastructure protection requirements. [22723/26]

View answer

Richard Boyd Barrett

Question:

256. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine whether compensation or alternative supports will be provided to landowners whose lands become ineligible for forestry due to electricity corridor restrictions [22724/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 252 to 256, inclusive, together.

My Department is in regular contact with the ESB, Coillte and the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment in relation to forests and electricity infrastructure.

Following storm Darrragh and Éowyn, my Department and Coillte collaborated with ESB Networks to assess windblown areas along power lines in forests. An ESB Networks Winter 2025 Resilience Plan was published. The objective of that plan is to enhance the resilience of the grid in the most vulnerable locations and along certain priority powerline forestry corridors. Some of this work, involving tree cutting in the vicinity of ESB lines in these priority areas, is ongoing in both Coillte and privately owned forests.

In relation to mitigating the risk of trees falling damaging powerlines, in July last year my colleague Darragh O Brien TD, Minister for Climate, Energy and the Environment brought a Heads of Bill to cabinet and the Government then approved the priority drafting of the Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Bill 2025 which will enhance the resilience of the electricity grid.

I understand the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment are currently consulting with stakeholders in connection with this Bill. The purpose of this Bill is to enable proactive measures, such as the establishment and maintenance of designated forestry corridors within existing forestry. My Department has inputted to the framework for the draft legislation, which amongst other things is intended to ensure that the ESB will be fully empowered to better manage this issue in the future. The Bill will allow for wider powerline forestry corridors to be created. I understand there will be more detail around the new corridor widths in regulations following the enactment of the Bill.

The Electricity (Supply) (Amendment) Bill 2025 will deal with the subject of compensation for landowners. Currently the ESB provide compensation to landowners who cannot afforest under a powerline, as a result of the presence of the powerline.

The existing powerline forestry corridors are outlined in the table below. These areas under the powerlines are not eligible for afforestation grants and premiums. Wider corridors would therefore lead to more land being ineligible for the afforestation scheme and at reforestation wider corridors would reduce the productive area of the forest. This is a big concern for some of the stakeholders that I have met. Until new forestry corridor widths and designs have been decided on it will not be possible to determine the impact any increased widths may have on future afforestation levels. My Department continues to engage with the Department of Climate, Energy and the Environment in relation to this matter. Any changes in relation to corridors will be reflected in my Department's Forestry Standards Manual.

Power line type

Corridor width (Current)

Low voltage (230V/400V0

None (clearance from branches and tree tops only)

10kv and 20kv

20 metres

38kv

20 metres

110kv

61 metres

220kv

68 metres

400kv

74 metres

Question No. 253 answered with Question No. 252.
Question No. 254 answered with Question No. 252.
Question No. 255 answered with Question No. 252.
Question No. 256 answered with Question No. 252.
Question No. 257 answered with Question No. 226.
Question No. 258 answered with Question No. 245.
Question No. 259 answered with Question No. 226.
Share