Skip to main content
Normal View

Thursday, 30 Apr 2026

Written Answers Nos. 242-252

International Relations

Questions (243)

Paul Murphy

Question:

243. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Transport the total number of United States military personnel who landed at Shannon Airport in each month of 2024, 2025 and to date in 2026, including those who remained on board the aircraft, those who disembarked and remained within the designated transit area, and those who exited the transit area or passed through customs, by month; and the definition of ‘military personnel’ used for the purposes of this data; and whether it encompasses contractors, civilian staff or intelligence personnel travelling on military aircraft. [31790/26]

View answer

Written answers

Shannon Airport is a civilian airport which has historically been used as a stopping point for transatlantic flights due its geographic position.

I refer the Deputy to my response to Dail Question No. 390 of 21 April 2026 in which I stated that my department does not collate data in relation to the number of United States military personnel transiting through Shannon Airport, nor do I have a statutory function in relation to the transit of foreign military personnel. I can advise the Deputy that the data that Shannon Airport collates in relation to such passengers is purely for operational reasons including managing the operational environment in the airport including passenger facilities and for charging purposes.

Shannon Airport has already provided the Deputy with the total number of military personnel which transited for the first three months of 2026 in response to Question No.390.

I am advised by Shannon Airport that it does not collate information in the manner in which the Deputy has requested. The number of passengers who disembark transiting aircraft is not collected by the airport. These passenger numbers are recorded in general terms as ‘military personnel’ reflecting the number of passengers on board. I have asked Shannon Airport to provide the Deputy with these total numbers by month for 2024 and 2025.

Dublin Airport Authority

Questions (244)

Paul Donnelly

Question:

244. Deputy Paul Donnelly asked the Minister for Transport the number of permits that DAA issued for allowing taxi drivers to pick up customers at Dublin Airport in 2025 and to-date in 2026; and the criteria that needs to be met for a permit to be issued to taxi drivers. [31798/26]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, daa has statutory responsibility to operate, manage and develop Dublin Airport. As such, matters in relation to the management of taxi permits are a matter for daa.

I have therefore forwarded your question to daa for direct reply. If the Deputy does not receive a response within ten working days, please advise my Private Office.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Orders

Bus Éireann

Questions (245)

Paul Donnelly

Question:

245. Deputy Paul Donnelly asked the Minister for Transport the percentage of Bus Éireann PSO fleet that is currently fully wheelchair accessible; and the estimated cost needed to ensure the remainder of the PSO fleet is wheelchair accessible. [31799/26]

View answer

Written answers

As Minister for Transport, I have responsibility for policy and overall funding in relation to public transport; however, I am not involved in the day-to-day operations of public transport.

The query raised by the Deputy is an operational matter for Bus Éireann. I have, therefore, referred the Deputy's question to the company for direct reply. Please advise my private office if you do not receive a reply within ten working days.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Orders.

Air Services

Questions (246)

Gillian Toole

Question:

246. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport whether his Department has had any communication with affected residents or their representatives since August 2022 regarding referred complaints concerning the Runway 28R Standard Instrument Departure to Fingal County Council; whether he is aware that Fingal County Council has stated, including in the course of correspondence with the Office of the Ombudsman, that it lacks technical expertise in flight path matters; whether he is aware that the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority has confirmed it monitors for noise compliance only and does not monitor planning compliance with the 2007 Environmental Impact Statement; whether he is aware that Freedom of Information decision TRA-FOI-2026-0086 of 9 April 2026 confirmed under section 15(1)(a) that the Department holds no records of any aviation qualifications among its staff, has conducted no periodic expertise review of the kind recommended by Safety Recommendation IRLD2021029 of the 2021 Air Accident Investigation Unit Report on Rescue 116, and holds no terms of reference, findings, or actions taken in respect of such a review; whether he is aware that his Department's Assistant Secretary for Aviation confirmed to the Joint Committee on Transport on 4 March 2026 that "daa are the owners of the data" (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31817/26]

View answer

Written answers

I can confirm that my Department has not in any communication with affected residents or their representatives since August 2022 referred complaints concerning the Runway 28R Standard Instrument Departure to Fingal County Council (FCC).

Regarding whether I am aware that FCC “has stated, including in the course of correspondence with the Office of the Ombudsman, that it lacks technical expertise in flight path matters”, I want to clarify that FCC does not set flight paths.

As a contracting state to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and a member state of the European Union, Ireland complies with ICAO standards and EU legislation regarding civil aviation. Under EU legislation, the operator of an airport is responsible for the design and maintenance of Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) which set flight paths into and out of an airport. The Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), as the civil aviation safety regulator in Ireland, has responsibility for ensuring that IFPs adhere to safety standards set out in national, EU and international regulations.

I can further confirm that I am aware that “the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority (ANCA) “has confirmed it monitors for noise compliance only and does not monitor planning compliance with the 2007 Environmental Impact Statement” and I can confirm that this is in line with the statutory functions of the competent authority.

Regarding the points raised in relation to the aviation qualifications of the staff in my Department, I would like to clarify a number of points. As the Deputy may be aware, the IAA oversee both Air Nav Ireland and daa in relation to aviation safety and technical standards. The IAA are themselves subject to oversight from both ICAO and the European Union Aviation Safety Authority (EASA) and is subject to audits and inspections from those bodies. The Department engages in a structured manner with IAA on aviation safety risks and trends, as well as on international oversight of IAA and upcoming regulatory developments. The Department of Transport oversees all the agencies under its aegis in policy and legislative matters.

The Deputy may also wish to note that the safety recommendation that makes reference to ensuring that my Department has sufficient specialist aviation expertise to enable it to discharge effective oversight of the full range of IAA activities is safety recommendation no. 31.

On foot of this recommendation in the Air Accident Investigation Unit’s (AAIU) final report into the Rescue 116 accident, the previous Minister for Transport commissioned an independent review of aviation expertise utilised by EU ministries with responsibility for civil aviation. The review of oversight of aviation safety regulation in other jurisdictions was carried out by aviation consultants AQE (Aerospace Qualified Entity).

The review concluded that the Department has resources and expertise that are comparable to those Ministries in other European states with an independent aviation safety regulator. The Department’s arrangements for the oversight of the IAA were found to be comprehensive, robust, covering the full range of aspects of the work of the IAA.

The Department also conducted an in-house review of the oversight of safety regulation in other sectors in Ireland. The review found that the Department of Transport has comparable personnel, expertise and resources allocated to the oversight of the IAA to that of other government departments overseeing an independent safety regulator. Similar to the other departments, the Department of Transport relies on its independent regulator for technical expertise and advice when appropriate.

When an external view is required, my Department contracts aviation expertise and draws on advice. There are significant advantages to the approach of externally contracting specialist aviation expertise as necessary. It gives access to a greater range, depth and quantum of expertise compared to a standing appointment of a single expert on contract or otherwise.

In addition, periodic review of the IAA is provided for in the Irish Aviation Authority Act 1993. Section 32 of the 1993 Act requires me to appoint an independent person or body to carry out an examination of the performance by the IAA of its functions in so far as they relate to the application and enforcement of technical and safety standards in relation to aviation safety. The section 32 examination is undertaken periodically, is independent from ICAO and EASA audits, and the audit is undertaken by contracted industry experts. A Section 32 examination is currently underway.

I can confirm that I am aware of the statements made to the Joint Committee on Transport on 4 March 2026 regarding the fact that noise data is captured by the daa and is not held by my Department.

Finally, as the Deputy will be aware, EU Regulation (598/2014) concerning Noise Related Operating Restrictions at EU Airports entered into effect on 13 June 2016. The aim of the Regulation is to contribute to the sustainable development of the European aviation sector. It applies to airports with annual aircraft movements exceeding 50,000. Based on traffic levels in Ireland, it only applies to Dublin Airport.

The Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019 gave effect to EU Regulation 598/2014 in Ireland by making additional provision for the regulation of aircraft noise at Dublin Airport, thereby providing for effective oversight of airport noise.

Air Services

Questions (247)

Gillian Toole

Question:

247. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport if he will review matters raised (details supplied) regarding flight routes; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31818/26]

View answer

Written answers

Regarding the independence of the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority, as the Deputy will be aware, the designation of Fingal County Council (FCC) as the Competent Authority was subject to extensive debate in the Dáil and Seanad, and during the pre-legislative scrutiny of the Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019 (the 2019 Act).

Furthermore, my department also sought legal advice on the matter at the time to ensure the selection of FCC met with the independence criterion of EU Regulation 598/2014.

The 2019 Act gave effect to EU Regulation 598/2014 in Ireland. Under Section 3 of the 2019 Act, FCC is designated as the sole competent authority for the purposes of EU Regulation 598/2014 under Section 3 (1) of the 2019 Act.

As per the 2019 Act, the competent authority functions are vested in the Chief Executive of FCC or a suitable delegate.

Following enactment of the 2019 Act, the FCC Chief Executive subsequently created a new division called the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority within its executive branch. ANCA is headed at a senior level by a Director of Service, who is supported by a core executive team and specialist service providers.

The independence of ANCA is secured in Section 3 of the 2019 Act, which makes it clear that in performing the functions of the competent authority, the Chief Executive and any employee are carrying out an executive function and shall not be subject to the direction of any other person (including the elected members of FCC). The 2019 Act provides that there is independence in decision making (Section 3), in funding (Section 5) and that this is supported by specific provisions ensuring transparency throughout the process (Section 9).

In relation to the levy, local authorities have a wide range of statutory based regulatory and enforcement functions. These relate to both their environment and planning roles and sit alongside their rate collection and property tax setting functions.

It is not reasonable to assert that the exercise of regulatory roles by local authorities might be in some way compromised by their sources of funding, and it is not unusual for regulatory bodies to be funded by the regulated entity in the form of a levy or charge on that entity.

Regarding the collection of environmental information under sections 9(10) and 19 of the 2019 ,the daa is responsible for implementing and maintaining noise measuring systems in the communities around Dublin airport. It is required to monitor aircraft noise around the airport and in communities in line with its responsibilities under the Act 2019 and as required by ANCA.

I understand that Dublin Airport currently has 25 fixed noise monitors located at various sites, generally under or near flight paths, throughout counties Dublin, Meath, and Wicklow, with an additional seven mobile monitors that can be rotated through comm

As the Deputy will be aware, ANCA monitors the aircraft noise climate around Dublin Airport and publishes noise contours that show the geographical impact of aircraft noise on the communities around the airport.

The contours represent aircraft noise that is averaged over a full year for different periods of the day in a standardised European format. The noise level of individual aircraft events is also available on a public web portal from the extensive network of daa noise monitors around the airport.

Every year, ANCA carries out an assessment of the effectiveness of the noise management measures at the airport and publishes a report on the findings on its website. This is in addition to publishing annual reports by the airport authority on the compliance by airport users with the noise management measures.

If through regular review, or an assessment of the potential impact of development at the airport indicate that new or amended measures are required to manage aircraft noise at the airport, ANCA will facilitate a period of public consultation on draft proposals to address any noise problem or potential noise problem.

Regarding points raised in relation to records released under Fingal FOI decisions FOI/2026/071 and FOI/2026/072, I understand that they are factually correct.

In relation to ANCA enforcement actions, the 2019 Act provided for consequential amendments to the Planning and Development Act 2000 to allow for planning permission for development at the airport to be processed in the same way as most planning applications – i.e. any application will be made to FCC in the first instance, with a provision for appeal to An Coimisiún Pleanála against its decision. This arrangement facilitates the involvement of ANCA in the processing of a planning application that has a noise dimension.

In relation to point (h), as I have set out previously, the independence of ANCA is established in the 2019 Act.

Air Navigation Orders

Questions (248)

Gillian Toole

Question:

248. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport the body that in his view, bears responsibility for ensuring that the departure routes from Dublin Airport's Runway 28R comply with the 2007 Environmental Impact Statement on which planning permission was granted under An Bord Pleanála reference PL06F.217429 (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31820/26]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy be aware, a robust regulatory framework is required to support the aviation sector and to ensure the highest professional standards, for a safe and secure aviation environment. As such, the Irish aviation sector is highly regulated, with a number of different regulators each of which has distinct, specific roles and regulatory powers to enable them to carry out their separate, statutory roles in an independent manner.

As a contracting state to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and a member state of the European Union, Ireland complies with ICAO standards and EU legislation regarding civil aviation. Under EU legislation, the operator of an airport is responsible for the design and maintenance of Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) which set flight paths into and out of an airport. The Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), as the civil aviation safety regulator in Ireland, has responsibility for ensuring that IFPs adhere to safety standards set out in national, EU and international regulations.

Flight paths are also monitored for compliance with noise requirements by the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority (ANCA), which is designated as the competent authority in Ireland for EU Regulation 598/2014.

Separately, monitoring compliance with planning permission conditions is matter for the relevant Council that granted those permissions, and enforcement of planning conditions is a matter for the relevant planning authorities.

Each of the aforementioned competent authorities has a range of powers of enforcement available where issues of non-compliance are identified. They are independent in the performance of their functions, and it is not open to me as Minister, to intervene on matters which are the responsibility of these independent authorities.

Regarding your point that Coimisiún Pleanála has not made a determination on the flight path deviation, I would like to again clarify that flight paths are not a condition of planning at Dublin Airport.

Concerning your point that the Environmental Protection Agency has no statutory function in aviation noise, in 2006, the EPA was designated as the National Authority under Section 5(1) of the European Communities (Environmental Noise) Regulations 2018 (S.I. No. 549 of 2018). This requires the EPA to exercise general supervision over the functions and actions of noise-mapping bodies and action planning authorities, including Fingal County Council, in relation the Dublin Airport Noise Map and Action Plan, and to provide guidance or advice to such bodies and authorities, where necessary.

As outlined previously, there are a number of different regulators each of which has distinct, specific roles and regulatory powers to enable them to carry out their separate, statutory roles in an independent manner.

Monitoring compliance with planning permission conditions is matter for the relevant Council that granted those permissions, and enforcement of planning conditions is a matter for the relevant planning authorities. However, to reiterate, flight paths are not a condition of planning at Dublin Airport.

Dublin Airport Authority

Questions (249)

Gillian Toole

Question:

249. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport the number of noise complaints referred by the DAA plc to AirNav Ireland in 2024 and in 2025 that received a substantive response from AirNav Ireland to the affected resident; the median time between referral by DAA and substantive response by AirNav that has been in each of those years; whether he is aware that residents who receive DAA's template response stating "The flight event will be shared to AirNav, our air navigation service provider, for further investigation" report receiving no further communication from AirNav Ireland or DAA in respect of the referred event; whether his Department has at any point enquired of AirNav Ireland on the operation of this referral process; and whether he considers a referral process in which the receiving body does not substantively respond to the affected resident consistent with Article 5 of the Aarhus Convention (collection and dissemination of environmental information) and the requirement that public authorities make environmental information "effectively accessible"; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31822/26]

View answer

Written answers

I believe that it may be helpful to clarify from the outset the roles of individual organisations involved in this process:

• Under EU legislation, the operator of an airport, daa in the case of Dublin Airport, is responsible for the design and maintenance of Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) which set flight paths into and out of an airport.

• AirNav Ireland carries out the design and maintenance function on behalf of daa.

• The Irish Aviation Authority, as the civil aviation safety regulator in Ireland, has responsibility for ensuring that IFPs adhere to safety standards set out in national, EU and international regulations.

• Flight paths are also monitored for compliance with noise requirements by ANCA, in line with EU Regulation 598/2014.

Regarding your queries in relation to the “the number of noise complaints referred by the DAA plc to AirNav Ireland in 2024 and in 2025 that received a substantive response from AirNav Ireland to the affected resident” and “the median time between referral by DAA and substantive response by AirNav that has been in each of those years” I have referred these parts of your parliamentary question to AirNav Ireland for direct response. Please advise my private office if you have not received a reply within 10 working days.

Regarding your queries in relation to the “DAA's template response stating "The flight event will be shared to AirNav, our air navigation service provider, for further investigation", I have referred this part of your question to the daa for direct response. Please advise my private office if you have not received a reply within 10 working days.

I can confirm that my department has not engaged with AirNav Ireland regarding the aforementioned referral process.

Each of the abovementioned bodies are independent in the performance of their statutory functions.

A referred reply was forwarded to the Deputy under Standing Orders

Dublin Airport Authority

Questions (250)

Gillian Toole

Question:

250. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport whether he is aware that the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority formally requested noise data from DAA plc in April 2024 for the purpose of the noise assessment required under Regulation (EU) 598/2014; that daa did not supply the requested data until November 2025, a delay of approximately 19 months; that the delay extended past An Coimisiún Pleanála's decision of 16 July 2025 granting daa's Relevant Action application (ABP-314485-22) with revised conditions, such that the data was not supplied until approximately four months after the Board's decision, and approximately three months before the European Commission's decision C(2026) 919 of 10 February 2026 finding Ireland's process for the adoption of noise-related operating restrictions at Dublin Airport non-compliant with Regulation (EU) 598/2014; that section 9(10)(a) of the Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019 empowers ANCA to direct the airport authority to provide information; whether any statutory or regulatory provision has been identified to the Minister, by DAA, ANCA, or any other body under his remit, as the basis on which the supply of noise data to the statutory regulator was lawfully conditional on the status of the Relevant Action; whether his Department has at any point enquired into the reasons for the 19-month delay; whether he recalls a meeting (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31824/26]

View answer

Written answers

I thank the Deputy for the detailed questions.

In December 2023 daa applied to Fingal County Council, the relevant planning authority, for planning permission to increase the capacity of the airport to 40m passengers through the construction of new aircraft piers, stands and other works - the so-called Infrastructure application.

As the Deputy will be aware the Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019 provides a wholly independent aircraft noise regulation process in accordance with EU Regulation 598/2014. The Act provides that all future development at Dublin airport is subject to assessment and mitigation in respect of the impact of associated aircraft movements on the noise environment around Dublin Airport.

In that regard the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority (ANCA) commenced an assessment of the Infrastructure Application and determined that the application should be supplemented with additional information which daa has been directed to provide.

In that context, I can confirm that I am aware of the timing of the request from ANCA for “noise data from daa plc in April 2024 for the purpose of the noise assessment required under Regulation (EU) 598/2014”, and I can clarify that the request was issued by ANCA in March 2024, rather than in April 2024. Furthermore, it is my understanding that the requested data was subsequently provided by daa to ANCA in November 2025.

It is important to note that ANCA are independent in the performance of their regulatory functions as the competent authority for aircraft noise, and it is not open to me as Minister for Transport, to intervene on matters which are the responsibility of independent authorities.

With regard to the North Runway Relevant Action (NRRA), it is my understanding that the daa’s stated position is that it needed a decision on the NRRA application before providing the requested data to ANCA in order to ensure the information provided was as robust and accurate as possible.

It is my opinion that the timing of the provision of information does not materially interfere with the independence of the process.

Dublin Airport Authority

Questions (251)

Gillian Toole

Question:

251. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport whether he is aware that Fingal County Council issued a warning letter to DAA PLC in September 2022 in respect of the Runway 28R Standard Instrument Departure routes; that more than 180 weeks have now elapsed without Fingal issuing an enforcement notice or proceeding under section 160 of the Planning and Development Act 2000 (details supplied); and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31825/26]

View answer

Written answers

As the Deputy will be aware, it is essential that our regulatory framework is robust and proportionate in order to properly support the aviation sector and to ensure the highest professional standards, for a safe and secure aviation environment.

I can assure the Deputy that the Irish aviation sector is highly regulated, with a number of different regulators each of which has distinct, specific roles and regulatory powers to enable them to carry out their separate, statutory roles in an independent manner.

As a contracting state to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and a member state of the European Union, Ireland complies with ICAO standards and EU legislation regarding civil aviation. Under EU legislation, the operator of an airport is responsible for the design and maintenance of Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) which set flight paths into and out of an airport. The Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), as the civil aviation safety regulator in Ireland, has responsibility for ensuring that IFPs adhere to safety standards set out in national, EU and international regulations.

Flight paths are also monitored for compliance with noise requirements by the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority (ANCA).

Separately, monitoring compliance with planning permission conditions is matter for the relevant Council that granted those permissions, and enforcement of planning conditions is a matter for the relevant planning authorities. It is important to note that flight paths are not a condition of planning at Dublin Airport.

Each of the aforementioned competent authorities has a range of powers of enforcement available where issues of non-compliance are identified. They are independent in the performance of their functions, and it is not open to me as Minister, to intervene on matters which are the responsibility of these independent authorities.

Dublin Airport Authority

Questions (252)

Gillian Toole

Question:

252. Deputy Gillian Toole asked the Minister for Transport whether he agrees with the position, stated by the managing director of Dublin Airport (a DAA plc employee) to the Joint Committee on Transport on 24 March 2026, that ‘there is no such thing as planning permission for flight paths’; whether he considers that position consistent with Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (details supplied); if he does not agree with DAA's position, to state on the basis his Department has continued to rely on DAA's position in its dealings with the Oireachtas and in the preparation of the Dublin Airport (Passenger Capacity) Bill 2026; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [31827/26]

View answer

Written answers

I thank the Deputy for the detailed questions and welcome the opportunity to provide clarity regarding these important issues.

Firstly, with regard to whether I agree “with the position, stated by the Managing Director of Dublin Airport (a daa plc employee) to the Joint Committee on Transport on 24 March 2026, that there is no such thing as planning permission for flight paths”, I would like to clarify from the outset that flight paths are not a condition of planning at Dublin airport.

As a Contracting State to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and a member state of the European Union (EU), Ireland complies with ICAO standards and EU legislation regarding civil aviation. Under EU legislation, the operator of an airport is responsible for the design and maintenance of Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) which set flight paths into and out of an airport. The Irish Aviation Authority (IAA), as the civil aviation safety regulator in Ireland, has responsibility for ensuring that IFPs adhere to safety standards set out in national, EU and international regulations.

Flight paths are also monitored for compliance with noise requirements by the Aircraft Noise Competent Authority (ANCA).

Separately, monitoring compliance with planning permission conditions is matter for the relevant Council that granted those permissions, and enforcement of planning conditions is a matter for the relevant planning authorities.

Regarding whether I consider “that position consistent with Council Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, in particular Article 2(1) which requires that projects likely to have significant environmental effects be made subject to assessment before development consent is granted,” I can confirm the project at Dublin Airport was subject to an Environmental Impact Assessment.

With regard to the Deputy’s specific queries in relation to An Bord Pleanála's decision of 23 August 2007 and the process followed in reaching this decision, this is a matter for An Coimisiún Pleanála (ACP) rather than my Department.

Concerning whether I consider “daa's position defensible in the context of the European Commission complaint CPLT(2026)00881, registered on 12 March 2026 under the lead of the Directorate-General for Environment, which alleges breach of the EIA Directive on the basis that the Routes Flown have not been assessed;”, as you will be aware, on the 17th of July 2025, ACP, in its role as the Appeals Body for Aircraft Noise Regulation (per Section 10 of the Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019), published its Decision in relation to night-time air traffic operations at Dublin Airport. This decision included, amongst other conditions, a restriction on flights on the new north runway between midnight and 6am except in exceptional specified circumstances.

On the 8th of August 2025, ACP notified the EU Commission of the operating restrictions set out in its July 2025 decision, as required under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 598/2014, and the EU Commission subsequently undertook an assessment of the process followed by ACP in its decision.

On the 10th of February 2026, following completion of its assessment, the EU Commission issued a notification advising that the process used by ACP for the proposed introduction of operating restrictions at Dublin Airport did not fully follow the Balanced Approach process, as set out in Regulation (EU) 598/2014.

The Balanced Approach involves consideration of a range of measures, such as reduction of noise at source, effective land-use planning and management, and noise abatement operational procedures, before implementing any noise-related operating restrictions at an airport.

In line with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 598/2014 and the Aircraft Noise (Dublin Airport) Regulation Act 2019, as the independent competent authority for this matter on appeal, ACP will now have to examine this Decision and to determine the most appropriate next steps.

Given that this is currently an open case with ACP, it would be inappropriate to comment further on the matter at this time.

Share