Skip to main content
Normal View

Foreign Policy

Dáil Éireann Debate, Tuesday - 12 May 2026

Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Questions (299)

Michael Cahill

Question:

299. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Defence to give a detailed up to date report in regard to the triple lock and Irish neutrality (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34193/26]

View answer

Written answers

The purpose of the Defence (Amendment) Bill 2026 is to consolidate, with amendments, the existing provisions of the Defence Acts 1954 to 2015 concerning the despatch of members of the Defence Forces for service outside the State. In effect, the requirement for a UN mandate will be removed. It will modify the existing requirement regarding the so-called ‘triple lock’ mechanism in relation to the despatch of the Defence Forces for service outside the State as part of an International United Nations Force.

Ireland’s policy of military neutrality remains a fundamental and enduring element of our foreign and security policy. Ireland has a proud and long-standing record of participation in UN peacekeeping operations, as well as engagement in a range of international defence cooperation and training initiatives. These activities are entirely consistent with, and do not compromise, our military neutrality. I wish to reiterate again that the Government has no intention of changing this policy.

The proposed Defence (Amendment) Bill is designed to strengthen Ireland’s capacity to pursue an independent and sovereign foreign policy. In particular, it seeks to remove the ability of permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to exercise a veto over Ireland’s decisions on participation in peacekeeping and similar missions. I again wish to underline that the legislation that is currently in place allows members of the UN Security Council, by means of a veto or indeed threat of same, to bind this country's hands in its international peacekeeping engagement. Recent vetoes by a UN Security Council member on a proposed resolution for a full and unconditional ceasefire in Gaza last June and September;  challenges evidenced last summer with regard to the extension of the UNIFIL peacekeeping in southern Lebanon, as well as ongoing issues regarding UN mandated missions in the Western Balkans, are ample evidence of this.

With regard to the UNIFIL mission particularly, in the event that the UNIFIL mandate was not extended, Ireland would have been in the position of having to plan to withdraw its Defence Forces personnel from UNIFIL immediately following the expiration of the mandate. The extension of the UNIFIL mandate until the end of this year permits the continued deployment of Defence Forces personnel to the Mission, however, under the current legislative requirements, they must be withdrawn from then.

I am also keeping a close eye on the forthcoming rollover of the UN mandate for the EU Mission Operation IRINI in the Mediterranean, at the end of May. Should that mandate not be renewed, we will have also to withdraw our personnel from that Mission.

I have been very clear that any considerations on engagement  in international peacekeeping should be within Ireland's exclusive sovereign control and decision-making on this should be purely within the remit of the Government and Oireachtas, which have been democratically elected by the people of this country.

Share