Skip to main content
Normal View

Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Written Answers Nos. 933-953

Mother and Baby Homes

Questions (933)

Michael Cahill

Question:

933. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality her plans in regard to the continued sealing of State records relating to mother and baby homes, and denying survivors and families access to the truth; if she will investigate and excavate burial sites where children are believed to be buried, unseal institutional records and provide survivors and families access to their own information, extending redress to all survivors, without exclusion; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34177/26]

View answer

Written answers

It is important to highlight that the records of the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation are already fully available to survivors seeking their own information.

The arrangements for preserving the records compiled by a Commission of Investigation in the course of its work are prescribed in Section 43(2) of the Commissions of Investigation Act 2004. This provides that, prior to its dissolution, a Commission must deposit all records with the prescribed Minister. On the expiry of a 30-year period thereafter, such records will be transferred to the National Archives and access is regulated in accordance with the National Archives Act, 1986.

Commission archives deposited with the Minister under the 2004 Act are subject to a general principle of confidentiality. Section 11(1) specifies that a Commission shall conduct its investigation in private unless certain conditions for hearing evidence in public are met. Section 11(3) of the 2004 Act prohibits any person (including the Minister) from disclosing or publishing any evidence given or the contents of any document produced by a witness while giving evidence in private, with very limited exceptions. The general principle of confidentiality that applies to a Commission’s archives has been upheld in the courts.

In 2020 the Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes informed the Department that it had created a database in relation to the mothers and children who passed through 15 of the 18 institutions under investigation. The Commission indicated it believed it would be a valuable resource to assist information and tracing services for mothers and children, but it also felt it was compelled by law to permanently redact much of the valuable information within.

To ensure that this database information could be preserved and be available to survivors directly, the Government brought forward legislation - the Commission of Investigation (Mother and Baby Homes and certain related Matters) Records, and another Matter Act 2020. This Act provided for the deposit of the Commission's database with Tusla, in addition to transferring a copy of this database, together with the Commission's entire archive of records, to the Minister for Children. 

Legislation enables the Department to process subject access requests from people who wish to seek access to personal information that may be contained within the database and the broader Commission archive. 

Following engagement with the Office of the Attorney General, the Data Protection Commissioner and independent experts in the area of GDPR, the Department published information for individuals including its privacy notice indicating what personal data the Department holds and how it processes it, and a guide on how to request access to personal information (Subject Access Request (SAR)). A dedicated phone line (01-2376001) provides information for callers on the SAR process, and information on this is also regularly communicated to survivors and former residents via quarterly updates pursuant to the Government Action Plan for Survivors. More information on how to access personal data which may be held in the records of the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation can be found here - https://www.gov.ie/en/department-of-children-disability-and-equality/organisation-information/transfer-of-records-from-the-mother-and-baby-homes-commission-of-investigation/

For the avoidance of any doubt, it is important to clarify that the Commission was not in possession of original records and, therefore, no original records were impacted by the provisions in the 2004 legislation. State records remain in the possession of the relevant statutory body and appropriate access is regulated in accordance with relevant statute.

One of the seven major commitments in the afore-mentioned Government's Action Plan for Survivors and Former Residents of Mother and Baby and County Home Institutions was access to identity information. The Birth Information and Tracing Act 2022 provides a full and clear right of access to birth certificates and birth and early life information for all persons who were adopted, boarded out, nursed out or the subject of an illegal birth registration, or who otherwise have questions in relation to their origins.  The 2022 Act enables Tusla to process the Commission database for the purpose of responding to requests from relevant persons for personal information.  To date, under the Birth Information and Tracing Act, Tusla and the AAI have responded to over 17,700 requests for identity information.

Another of the major commitments in the Action Plan is the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme which provides payments and health benefits to eligible survivors of 44 Mother and Baby or County Home institutions that were identified by the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation as having a main function of providing sheltered and supervised ante and post-natal facilities to single mothers and their children. The Department of Children, Disability and Equality is responsible for overseeing the administration of the Scheme in line with the legislative scope and intent of the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme Act, as enacted by the Oireachtas. 

The Action Plan also outlines a commitment to establish a national memorial and records centre. The National Centre for Research and Remembrance, which will be located in Seán MacDermott Street, Dublin 1, will stand as a site of conscience to honour equally all those who spent time in Industrial Schools, Magdalen Laundries, Mother and Baby and County Home Institutions, Reformatories, and related institutions, and all those who have lived experience of Ireland’s historical adoption and boarded out systems. The National Centre will stand as part of our national institutions and will comprise:

a museum and exhibition space, the development of which will be led by the National Museum of Ireland;

• a research centre and repository of records related to institutional trauma in the 20th century, which will form part of the National Archives; and

• a garden space for reflection and remembrance.

The broader issue of access to records relating to Ireland's legacy of institutional trauma, including inquiry records, is being addressed as part of the development of the National Centre. A dedicated Legal and Legislative Subgroup has been established under the auspices of the National Centre Steering Group to advance this important, sensitive and complex work.

Finally, in relation to burial sites, the Commission of Investigation into Mother and Baby Homes had wide ranging powers and conducted very extensive inquiries, searches and test excavations at institutional sites in an effort to locate the burial places of children. Through this work the Commission was able to confirm the presence of children’s remains at the site of the former institution in Tuam that were interred in a repugnant manner.  Despite extensive efforts, the Commission did not identify similarly abhorrent burials at the other institutions it investigated.

In response to the situation in Tuam, in 2022 the Government directed the establishment of the Office of the Director of Authorised Intervention, Tuam, to manage and oversee the excavation, recovery, analysis, identification (if possible) and reburial of the children’s remains at the site. The intervention is being carried out under the provisions of the Institutional Burials Act 2022, which provides for the appointment of a Director where the Government is satisfied that burials have taken place and where there is evidence that those burials are manifestly inappropriate.

The Tuam Director was appointed in 2023. Preliminary groundworks were completed at the site at the end of 2024 and the excavation commenced in July 2025. Since starting the excavation, the Director has published six technical updates. These are all available on his Office’s website: www.odait.ie.

One of the tragic aspects of the Commission’s findings in relation to Bessborough is the uncertainty regarding the burial place of many children who were resident there. The Commission carried out assessments and surveys of the site and spoke to people with information about burials but it was unable to find any evidence of burials of the children who died at Bessborough in the grounds. As no evidence of locations was found, the Commission did not consider it feasible to excavate the full available site, which amounts to 60 acres, or indeed the former 200 acre estate, parts of which have now been built on.

The Commission used its investigative powers to conduct a forensic archaeological investigation of the children’s burial ground at Sean Ross Abbey. It did this in response to information that it had received that the graveyard, when still in use, had drainage works inserted through it and that, based on this assertion, there may be no remains at the site and it may never have been used as a graveyard. Site surveys, reviews of planning files and an independent drain inspection was followed by a forensic-standard test excavation, with multiple trenches opened in areas across the site where anomalies were identified by the surveys. The investigation found that coffined infant burials were located across the designated burial ground and that these had not been impacted by drainage works. The Commission concluded that no further investigation was warranted. The report of the investigation, which details the objectives, methodology and results, was published in full in the Commission’s final report, with the survey and drain inspection reports included as appendices.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (934)

Michael Cahill

Question:

934. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the action being taken to address issues raised in correspondence (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34179/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question refers to service matters, I have asked the Health Service Executive (HSE) to respond to the Deputy directly.

Children in Care

Questions (935)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

935. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the staff-to-child ratio and average length of stay in private versus statutory residential centres operated or funded by Tusla; the number of children that are currently on a waiting list for a residential care placement; the average waiting time; the procurement or tendering process governs the awarding of contracts to private residential care providers by Tusla; when was that process last reviewed; the number of privately operated children's residential centres currently hold HIQA registration; the current rate of compliance with HIQA standards across both private and statutory centres; the total number of Irish children currently placed in residential care outside the State, including in the United Kingdom, and the annual cost of such placements. [34211/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (936)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

936. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether individual residential childcare placements procured from the approved panel are subject to a secondary competitive process between providers; and if not, the basis on which a provider is selected in each case [34218/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (937)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

937. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality to set out the allocation mechanism used by Tusla when assigning residential childcare placements from the approved panel, including whether a ranking system, rotation system, or mini-competition process is applied. [34219/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (938)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

938. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether standardised national pricing frameworks, cost ceilings, or maximum weekly rates apply to private residential childcare placements procured through the panel; and if so, to provide details [34220/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (939)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

939. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the weighting applied to price, quality, and other criteria in the original tender process used to establish the residential childcare provider panel. [34221/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (940)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

940. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether emergency or out-of-hours residential childcare placements are exempt from standard procurement procedures; and if so, the safeguards in place to control cost and ensure value for money in such cases. [34222/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (941)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

941. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the number of providers currently on the residential childcare procurement panel; the date on which the panel was established; its duration; and whether additional providers may be admitted during its lifetime. [34223/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (942)

Ken O'Flynn

Question:

942. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether any value-for-money, procurement compliance, or audit review has been conducted in respect of private residential childcare placements since 2020; and if so, to provide details and findings. [34224/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (943)

Michael Cahill

Question:

943. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 1037 of 17 February 2026, if any progress been made in respect of an urgent matter (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34241/26]

View answer

Written answers

 The Guardian ad litem National Service has been established to ensure that children’s voices are heard, and their best interests are independently presented, by an appointed Guardian ad litem, in child care proceedings.

The Guardian ad litem National Service, as provided for under the Child Care (Amendment) Act 2022, will come into effect on 23 June 2026.

Presently there are approximately 3,000 children with 96 appointed GALs operating across the country.

The commencement of the Guardian ad litem National Service marks a significant transformation of this sector. The need to reform of the Guardian ad litem role under the Child Care Act 1991 has been highlighted for many years. The new National Service will create a national, professional, high-quality service that better serves children and the courts.

The lack of defined qualifications, role and status, as well as an absence of appointment procedures for the Guardian ad litem has been widely acknowledged for many years. These practices resulted in ad hoc and inconsistent practices across the jurisdictions.

The Child Care (Amendment) Act 2022 introduces a national framework, including a new Part VA, establishing standardised authorisation, appointment, and regulatory mechanisms.

Following commencement, there is a 12 month transitional period during which time existing Guardians ad litem who have applied and been approved, can continue working with the children they have been appointed to.

Stakeholder concerns:

The two issues raised consistently are independence of Guardians ad litem and access to legal representation.

The independence of Guardians ad litem in the performance of their functions is a legislative requirement and a core value of the role.

The Child Care (Amendment) Act 2022 clearly states that Guardians ad litem must act independently in their professional judgment and function.

Guardians ad litem establish their own views on the best interests of the child based on their direct engagement with the young person, meetings with social workers, significant people in their lives, and reports available to them.

The Guardian ad litem National Service Policies and Procedures recognise and promote the independence of the Guardian ad litem in their role.

The provision of legal advice will be available to Guardians ad litem through an inhouse legal team supported by procured legal services where necessary.

The Guardian ad litem National Service holds the view, supported by the AG’s Office, that the advice provided to Guardians ad litem is legally privileged. Regardless of whether the solicitor is employed or contracted, and regardless of whether the Guardian ad litem is employed or contracted, where legal advice or representation is being provided to a Guardian ad litem, it will belong to them.

The Guardian ad litem National Service is committed to ensuring that children receive the highest quality service, and that appropriate legal representation will be available Guardians ad litem.

Progress towards commencement:

Recruitment: Interviews have concluded for Senior Solicitors and Legal Executive. Final interviews for Solicitors to be completed in May. The first Regional Manager started on the 27 April, to support the preparation for commencement. The first tranche of interviews for Guardians ad litem took place in March. From this process 40 candidates have progressed into clearance.

•  Child Participation: With the support of Foróige, the National Service has met with several care experienced young people to gather their views on the role of the Guardian ad litem and the complaints process. The feedback shared by these young people will inform the ongoing development of the service.

Stakeholder engagement:• Continuous engagement has taken place between stakeholders and the Guardian ad litem National Service. This remains a key element in the preparation for commencement. The National Service has engaged with Tusla, the Court Services, the Judiciary, the Association of Guardians ad litem Ireland, Empowering young People in Care, Irish Foster Care Association, NGOs including the Children’s Rights Alliance, the Ombudsman for Children’s Office, and directly with care experienced Young People.

Transfer of data:• The National Service has been working closely with Tusla regarding the commencement of the Act. An agreement is in place that Tusla will transfer information about children who currently have a Guardian ad litem to the National Service. This process is ongoing up to commencement, ensuring that the National Service has the information it needs so that there will be no disruption to children when the new service starts in June.

Tender for legal services:• A request for tenders for legal services closed on the 8 May. There was a very positive uptake to the tender request.

This will be a multi supplier Framework Agreement that will include the provision of legal advice to Guardians ad litem; representation in District Court child care proceedings; representation in High Court Special Care proceedings; and representation in Mental Health Act (section 25) applications.

Departmental Correspondence

Questions (944)

Michael Cahill

Question:

944. Deputy Michael Cahill asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality her views on a matter (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34264/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question refers to service matters, I have asked the Health Service Executive (HSE) to respond to the Deputy directly.

Disabilities Assessments

Questions (945)

Michael Healy-Rae

Question:

945. Deputy Michael Healy-Rae asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality to review the process of assessments for autism in children (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34288/26]

View answer

Written answers

It is understood that the Deputy is referring to the provision of autism assessments within the public healthcare system and the availability of autism assessments under the Assessment of Need Targeted Waitlist Initiative.

It is important to emphasise that an application for an Assessment of Need is not required to access an autism assessment.  Families can seek a referral for an autism assessment through a healthcare provider such as their GP, local Primary Care team, a healthcare professional or, for children with complex needs, the local Children’s Disability Network Team.  It is acknowledged that there can be long waiting times for families seeking autism assessments within the public system.

However, the HSE will launch an Autism Assessment and Intervention Pathways Protocol shortly.  The Protocol will provide a faster and more specialised route for autism assessment across primary care, mental health and disability services.  It will be the preferred assessment route for autism, and it is expected that using the protocol will enable teams to assess more people in a shorter timeframe.

It is intended that these assessments will explain and help people to understand the causes of their difficulties. It will also provide a diagnosis and identify the services and supports required.

New teams, known as In-Reach teams, are being established to support existing community teams using the protocol, providing additional resources, and allowing faster assessment.

The Assessment of Need Targeted Waitlist Initiative was introduced by Government in May 2024 to support the delivery of Assessments of Need to those families who have been waiting longest.  Under the Targeted Waitlist Initiative, the HSE procures clinical assessments from approved private providers. These providers are reimbursed by the HSE for clinical assessments undertaken as part of the Assessment of Need process. By the end of 2025, over 7,700 clinical assessments had been commissioned from private providers since the Initiative started in June 2024.

Funding of €20 million is being provided this year to continue the Initiative, enabling the delivery of approximately 6,000 clinical assessments with a specific focus on autism assessments. The HSE recently established a new Panel of service providers to deliver these autism diagnostic assessments for children and adolescents under the Initiative. The Panel was established on foot of a tender process by the HSE , which was advertised on the eTenders portal and the Official Journal of the European Union, with tender responses assessed against key criteria.  The Panel, which includes 29 providers, became operational in February 2026 and will be in place for one year, with an option to extend for a further year. These autism assessments will inform the Assessment of Need process. It should be noted that funding is not provided to individuals or families who wish to procure a private clinical assessment themselves.

Under the Disability Act, an Assessment of Need is an assessment process carried out by the HSE where a person is of the opinion that they may have a disability, for anyone born after 1st June 2002. It first establishes whether the person has a disability (as defined within the Act).  If it is determined that they do, the process then identifies the health and education needs of the person with a disability, and the services required to meet those needs.

Children do not require an Assessment of Need to access health services, including Primary Care, Children’s Disability Network Teams or Mental Health Services.

In December 2025, Government announced a series of reforms to the Assessment of Need process which will make the process more effective and efficient for children and families.  Over time, this should lead to a reduction in the waiting time to receive an assessment.  This reform includes legislative and operational reforms to support the efficiency and effectiveness of the Assessment of Need process.

The proposed legislative changes will not remove any rights for parents to apply for an Assessment of Need for their child.  They also will not alter the statutory six-month timeline set out in the Disability Act.

The General Scheme of the Disability (Amendment) Bill has been published on the Department’s website.  An FAQ document - assets.gov.ie/static/documents/2fc0c49e/20260324-FAQ-Version-1.1-CLEARED.pdf - has also been published, providing information on the Assessment of Need process and the proposed changes for parents and any other interested stakeholders.

Mother and Baby Homes

Questions (946)

Ivana Bacik

Question:

946. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality when legislation will be published and introduced, amending the Institutional Burial Act to enable first cousins to provide DNA for matching with babies lost in the Tuam Mother and Baby Home. [34324/26]

View answer

Written answers

On 28 April Government approved my proposal to draft amendments to the Institutional Burials Act 2022 to include first cousins as eligible family members who can participate in an Identification Programme under the 2022 Act.

I brought the proposal to Government on foot of updated scientific advice from Forensic Science Ireland, which was provided to the Department in March.  This updated advice supports the inclusion of first cousins in an Identification Programme under the Act.

I am aware that there are first cousins who are interested in participating in the Tuam Identification Programme so I was keen to move quickly on this when the scientific advice was updated.

Officials in the Department of Children, Disability and Equality will now work with the Office of the Attorney General to draft the necessary amendments.  While it is not possible to provide a definitive timeline, the intention is to introduce the amendments to the Houses of Oireachtas at the earliest opportunity with a view to making the amendments to the legislation this year.

Mother and Baby Homes

Questions (947)

Ivana Bacik

Question:

947. Deputy Ivana Bacik asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if the review of the mother and baby institutions payment scheme is running to time; if it is proposed that the review will be debated by Oireachtas, both before and after it is conducted; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34325/26]

View answer

Written answers

The Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme opened for applications in March 2024.

The underpinning legislation for the Scheme provides for a number of reports and reviews to be produced.  Section 48 of the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme Act provides for two reviews of the operation of the Scheme, the first of which must commence within 6 months of the second anniversary of its establishment, i.e. by September 2026.

The scope of the review is prescribed in the Act. It is focused on administrative and operational delivery aspects of the Scheme. It will consider issues such as the level of uptake of the Scheme, the experience of applicants, the extent to which payments have been made and if the Scheme is achieving its purpose. I may also consider any other matter relevant to the administration of the Scheme. I will ensure the review report will be laid before the Houses of the Oireachtas. 

While the review has not yet commenced, the preparatory work for it is already well underway.

Children in Care

Questions (948)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

948. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the current number of children in special emergency arrangements (SEAs), by Tusla region and age group. [34370/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (949)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

949. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the average, median, and longest duration a child has spent in a special emergency arrangement in each of the past five years. [34371/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (950)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

950. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the number of children that have remained in a special emergency arrangement for longer than 30 days, 90 days and six months. [34372/26]

View answer

Written answers

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Questions (951)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

951. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the statutory or legal basis under which children may be placed in unregistered special emergency arrangements, particularly where such placements extend beyond the immediate emergency period. [34373/26]

View answer

Written answers

I wish to thank the Deputy for raising this question. The Department is currently collating the information requested and a reply will issue directly to the Deputy on this matter.

Children in Care

Questions (952, 953, 957)

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

952. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether court approval or judicial oversight is sought when a child remains in a special emergency arrangement beyond an initial emergency period; and if not, the reason. [34374/26]

View answer

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

953. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the reason HIQA does not inspect special emergency arrangements; and whether she will commit to extending independent inspection powers to these placements. [34375/26]

View answer

Peadar Tóibín

Question:

957. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the reason oversight of special emergency arrangements is conducted entirely within Tusla; and whether any independent or external oversight mechanism exists. [34379/26]

View answer

Written answers

I propose to take Questions Nos. 952, 953 and 957 together.

Both Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, and the Department are committed to promoting safe and high-quality practice in all areas of Alternative Care. This is achieved through the thorough application of regulations and standards that govern care placements on behalf of the State. Tusla, and I as Minister share a common aim to meet the needs of all children in mainstream alternative care placements, and to reduce Tusla's operation of Special Emergency Arrangements (SEAs). 

HIQA carries out announced and unannounced inspections of statutory Children’s Residential Centres. HIQA carries out these inspections against the identified Regulations and Standards. Tusla is the statutory regulator of Private and Voluntary Children’s Residential Centres, and is therefore responsible for the registration and inspection of these centres in accordance with the relevant regulations, standards, and the provisions of the Child Care Act 1991.

This Act is the statutory framework for child welfare and protection in Ireland. The legislation places a statutory duty on Tusla to promote the welfare of children who are not receiving adequate care and protection. It sets the legislative provisions in relation to taking children into care, and the responsibilities of the State in that regard, which aim to improve outcomes for looked after children. Decisions regarding the granting of care orders are made by the Court.

Tusla, in discharging its statutory responsibilities under the Child Care Acts, must have the best interests of the child as its paramount consideration. It actively monitors every placement of every child in care to ensure its appropriateness to the needs of that child, and any concerns or breaches of standards or Regulations are addressed in this context.

Question No. 953 answered with Question No. 952.
Share