Carol Nolan
Ceist:
377. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Justice the legal basis for the recording of hate incidents (non-crime) by An Garda Síochána; the legal basis for investigations of such incidents; whether the identities of persons against whom complaints are made are recorded on the PULSE system; whether the retention of such data is in line with the relevant data protection laws in view of the fact that no crime has been committed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [28924/24]
Amharc ar fhreagra
I have requested the information sought by the Deputy from the Garda authorities. Unfortunately, the information was not received in time. I will contact the Deputy directly once the information is to hand.
The following deferred reply was received under Standing Order 51.
I refer to Parliamentary Question No. 377 to my Department, which was for written answer on 4 July 2024 and in which you requested the legal basis for the recording of hate incidents (non-crime) by An Garda Síochána; the legal basis for investigations of such incidents; whether the identities of persons against whom complaints are made are recorded on the PULSE system; whether the retention of such data is in line with the relevant data protection laws in view of the fact that no crime has been committed; and if I will make a statement on the matter. You will recall that the information you requested was not made available within the specified timeframe and that I committed to responding directly once it had been received.
I have now received the requested information from An Garda Siochana who have advised that the recording and retention of hate incidents (non-crime) by An Garda Síochána on the PULSE system is in line with relevant data protection laws and that Section 7(1) of the Garda Síochána Act 2005 states that the function of the Garda Síochána is to provide policing and security services for the State with the objective of vindicating the human rights of each individual.
The information further advises that An Garda Síochána defines a hate incident as any non-crime incident which is perceived by any person to, in whole or in part, be motivated by hostility or prejudice, based on actual or perceived age, disability, race, colour, nationality, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation or gender. An Garda Síochána’s policy document titled ‘Responding to Hate Crimes and None-Crime Hate Incidents’ states that the perception of the victim or other relevant person is central to determining whether to record an incident as a Hate Crime or a Hate Incident. Hate Incidents (Non-Crime) are by (working) definition not criminal offences and therefore do not result in criminal investigations
Once an incident is reported to An Garda Síochána it must be recorded on the PULSE system. Records made on PULSE is data generated that forms an accountable record of the actions taken by members of An Garda Síochána when performing their statutory policing function.
The records of data gathered and created within the course of business of An Garda Síochána are departmental records within the meaning of Section 2 of the National Archives Act, 1986. An Garda Síochána is a scheduled body within the meaning of Section 1 of the Act and is therefore legally obliged to retain and preserve departmental records made in the course of its business.
As you are no doubt aware, the Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill is currently before the Houses and the purpose of this Bill is to protect those who are most vulnerable to hate crime and hate speech. The Bill will legislate against hate crimes for the first time in Irish law and bring us into line with our European counterparts. It will also update our existing incitement to hatred laws dating from 1989 which do not reflect the modern online context; and in order to ensure compliance with EU law. In doing so, it will update and simplify existing offences to reflect the online context in which people now communicate and to ensure the legislation is more effective.
Under the new legislation, it will be an offence to communicate, or to behave in such a way that incites violence or hatred against a person on the basis of their race, colour, nationality, religion, national or ethnic origin, descent, gender, sex characteristics, sexual orientation or disability. It will not be an offence to hold an unpopular opinion, or to criticise or insult a person on account of their protected characteristics. The legislation is designed to protect vulnerable communities from the most serious types of hate speech - speech that will put them in harm's way. It is not intended to enforce politeness or political correctness. A person will still be able to, for example, say that they disagree with using a certain pronoun a person uses to identify themselves, and not use that pronoun if they don't wish to.
The Bill provides for an objective demonstration test, similar to that used in neighbouring jurisdictions, which allows for guilt to be established if the perpetrator uses, for example, a racial slur, gesture or other evidence of hatred towards the victim. The demonstration test is not based on the perception of the victim. For a prosecution to succeed, a jury will have to be convinced beyond reasonable doubt that a hate-aggravated offence has been committed.
The new law includes defences for reasonable and genuine contributions to literary, artistic, political, scientific, religious or academic discourse, and fair and accurate reporting. These are not covered by the existing Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989 and show the Government's commitment to protecting genuine debate. The Bill also includes a general provision on the right to protect freedom of speech.
It is the my intention to bring the Bill through the Houses in due course having considered appropriate amendments on foot of concerns raised.