Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 24 Feb 2026

Written Answers Nos. 1002-1021

Legislative Measures

Ceisteanna (1002)

Paul Nicholas Gogarty

Ceist:

1002. Deputy Paul Nicholas Gogarty asked the Minister for Health her views on measures aimed at improving mental health care and treatment, strengthening diagnosis, ensuring robust management of prescription medication, providing for the inclusion and support of co-parents in line with the Finnish model, and reducing risks to children (details supplied); the reason she proceeded with the Mental Health Bill 2025 without engaging with or incorporating insights from lived experience; the way in which she propose to address the resulting gaps in safeguarding children of mental health patients; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14530/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The provision of mental health services is, in the main, a matter for the Health Service Executive. However, there has been significant progress in policy implementation and annual increases in the mental health budget, enhancing all aspects of our mental health services and supports. This remains a key priority for the Government, building on the significant improvements in the delivery of our mental health services over the past number of years. Service improvement and development will continue throughout this year and into the future.

The Government’s clear commitment to enhancing mental health services, is shown by significant mental health funding increases in recent years. I am pleased to have secured an unprecedented level of funding, and the total allocation for mental health services for 2026 is almost €1.6bn, a record funding level. Mental health funding has increased by over 50% since I took office in 2020.

This increase in funding for mental health services represents a significant investment which will enable continued policy implementation and service improvement in line with our national mental health policy, Sharing the Vision (StV). StV is Ireland’s 10-year ambitious, multifaceted national mental health policy to enhance the provision of mental health services. The policy recognises the need for a whole-of-population, whole-of-government approach to the delivery of mental health services. It builds on the achievements of A Vision for Change, with a focus on a wider, cross-sectoral service provision appropriate to whole population needs, across a broad continuum from mental health promotion, prevention and early intervention, through to specialist mental health services.

In line with Sláintecare, the policy aims to provide “the right care in the right place at the right time”. Sharing the Vision aims to enhance the provision of mental health services and supports across a broad continuum, from mental health promotion, prevention, and early intervention to acute and specialist mental health service delivery, during the period 2020-2030.

The latest published Implementation Status Report (May 2025) provides an overview of progress against the StV Implementation Plan 2025-2027 across the entire policy. Prepared by the joint NIMC Steering Committee and HIG secretariats, it is the fourteenth status report.

Connecting for Life (CfL) is Ireland’s national suicide prevention strategy. The Strategy focuses on the primary and secondary prevention of suicidal behaviour and addresses a broad range of risk and protective factors. CfL has been running for 9 years, and an evaluation of its implementation as informed a successor strategy, which is due to be published in the coming weeks.

The Connecting for Life implementation structures remain in place until the successor strategy is complete. Examples of continuing work in this area includes a toolkit/framework to guide public sector agencies on effective measures that can prevent deaths by suicide in public places.

In addition, the Government remains committed to developing all aspects of mental health services nationally, including those for children and young people. Approximately €190 million is provided to the specialist CAMHS annually. Over €127 million was provided to community-based mental health organisations last year, with a significant proportion of this dedicated to supporting children and young people.

Funding allocated to mental health services in recent years has allowed for the continued investment in the mental health national clinical programmes and models of care, which has led to significant service improvements, including the aim to develop high-quality, person-centred, integrated care through a clinician-led, evidence-based approach to service reform, including the on-going expansion of specialist mental health teams for eating disorders, ADHD in adults, and Early Intervention in Psychosis.

With regard to management of medicine, the arrangements for ordering, prescribing, storing and administration of medication in approved inpatient mental health centres – all of which are the responsibility of either the prescribing clinician or the registered proprietor of each approved centre - are reviewed on every annual inspection of each approved mental health centre by the Inspector of Mental Health Services and his team (Regulation 23). The findings of these assessments are published in the Inspector’s reports and in the Mental Health Commission’s annual reports.

The development of a new Mental Health Bill is a longstanding priority for myself and the Department of Health and features in the current Programme for Government.

The Mental Health Bill 2024 will replace the existing 2001 Act, introducing a more modern, person-centred approach to mental health legislation and put in place a more robust framework in which mental health services will be delivered and regulated. The Bill passed the Dáil in July 2025 and is due at Report Stage in the Seanad next month.

The Bill is the result of years of research, consultation and drafting. The final Bill has been informed by the lived experience of people interacting with and working under the Mental Health Act. This includes the loved ones and family members of people accessing mental health services. There are a large variety of opinions regarding the Mental Health Bill and what it should and should not include. The fact that a certain viewpoint is not reflected in the published Bill does not mean that it has not been considered. Officials in my Department considered all correspondence relating to the Bill during the course of drafting and the final Bill reflects a balancing of many of views expressed in these correspondences.

As you may be aware, the Mental Health Bill will support the involvement of family members and loved ones, with the consent of the individual concerned, by explicitly stating that people accessing inpatient services may nominate a family member or other person with whom they can consult with throughout their treatment and who they can nominate to receive certain information about their care and treatment.

However, there are no plans to amend the Mental Health Bill to permit the mandatory sharing of information about an individual’s mental health treatment. People accessing mental health treatment deserve equal treatment in relation to their privacy rights to any other form of healthcare. The Bill already supports the inclusion of family members in a person’s mental health care and treatment.

Additionally, there are existing mechanisms in place for clinicians to breach confidentiality in relation to any person under their care, when necessary. For example, there are circumstances where it may be necessary to disclose information about a person where they are at serious risk of harm to themselves or others and this includes, where a child or elderly person is at risk of violence or abuse. Medical Council guidelines specifically allow for this to happen, and that course of action has always been available to doctors. Of course, prediction of risk is not always easy.

I am very supportive of the involvement of family members in an individual’s mental health treatment, where the individual consents. Confidentiality is central to building a trusting relationship between a clinician and a person under his or her care. A person must be assured that, outside of limited circumstances, information he or she shares with his or her clinician is treated confidentially. It is at the discretion of the individual as to what and how much information they allow a doctor or service to disclose to their family members. This applies equally across all areas of medicine, not just mental health.

The State is obligated to ensure that the rights of people with severe mental health difficulties are protected and that they are given the opportunity to be active participants in their own care and treatment. This central concept is embodied in the Mental Health Bill 2024.

The Parent-infant psychotherapy (PiP) model of care mentioned in your question is not reflected in the provisions of the Mental Health Bill. However, based on the information provided in your correspondence, nothing in the Mental Health Bill would seem to preclude the adoption of such a model when the Bill becomes law. It may be most appropriate for the HSE to consider the viability of this model as part of its delivery of perinatal mental health services, and I will ask that this be shared with the National Clinical Lead for the Programme.

Nursing Homes

Ceisteanna (1003, 1004, 1005)

Robert O'Donoghue

Ceist:

1003. Deputy Robert O'Donoghue asked the Minister for Health the total cost to the State of funding nursing home care for persons aged under 65 years under the nursing homes support scheme (Fair Deal) in each of the years 2021 to 2025 inclusive and to date; the number of such residents in each year; and the average annual and weekly cost per resident, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14534/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Robert O'Donoghue

Ceist:

1004. Deputy Robert O'Donoghue asked the Minister for Health the average weekly, and annual cost, per resident aged under 65 years in publicly operated nursing homes, and privately operated nursing homes, for each of the years 2021 to 2025 inclusive; and the variance in cost between each sector, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14535/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Robert O'Donoghue

Ceist:

1005. Deputy Robert O'Donoghue asked the Minister for Health the average annual cost to the State of supporting a person aged under 65 years in a nursing home compared with a community-based residential placement, and living independently with funded personal assistance or home-care supports; whether a cost-benefit analysis has been conducted comparing these models of care; to publish any such analysis, or state when it will be completed; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14536/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1003 to 1005, inclusive, together.

As these are service matters, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond directly to the Deputy as soon as possible.

Question No. 1004 answered with Question No. 1003.
Question No. 1005 answered with Question No. 1003.

Hospital Appointments Status

Ceisteanna (1006)

Brian Stanley

Ceist:

1006. Deputy Brian Stanley asked the Minister for Health the age-related criteria and the clinical or medical circumstances under which a patient awaiting fertility treatment including IVF at the Coombe Hospital may be prioritised for an urgent appointment; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14550/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Model of Care for Fertility was developed by the Department of Health in conjunction with the HSE.

Under the Model of Care for Fertility referrals for publicly-funded, privately-provided assisted human reproduction (AHR) treatment are subject to patients meeting the access criteria agreed by the Department and the HSE. These access criteria were developed by a multi-disciplinary expert group together with a review of international evidence in the field. These criteria include, for example, restrictions in respect of maternal age, body mass index (BMI), and the number of previous IVF cycles / AHR procedures undertaken.

It is important to ensure that patients are clinically determined by a consultant in a Regional Fertility Hub for IVF, ICSI or IUI before being referred for such treatment, having undertaken at the Hub, as appropriate, extensive consultation, assessment, and various types of procedures and interventions including: relevant blood tests, semen analysis, assessment of tubal patency, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, fertility-related surgeries, ovulation induction and follicle tracking, which are available at the Regional Fertility Hub level.

Once a couple is clinically determined as appropriate for advanced treatment and they meet the national access criteria, then further to them consenting to such treatment and consenting to a referral being made to their chosen private providers, a referral is made for them within a matter of working days, with private providers providing an initial consultation to referred public patients within a six-week period, if not earlier. Furthermore, there is no average time for a referral from a Regional Fertility Hub to a private provider, as each couple is unique and need to be managed according to their circumstances. Some couples have very complex conditions that may require surgical intervention, while others may have a previously-diagnosed fertility issue.

More information is available on the HSE website in respect of the publicly-funded AHR treatment initiative, including more details on the access criteria and specific services available, at:

www2.hse.ie/pregnancy-birth/trying-for-a-baby/your-fertility/getting-ivf-icsi-iui-hse/

I want to reassure the Deputy that my Department and the Government are focused, through the full implementation of the Model of Care for Fertility, on ensuring that patients receive care at the appropriate level of clinical intervention and those requiring, and eligible for, advanced AHR treatment such as IVF can access same through the most effective deployment of finite public resources.

Vaccination Programme

Ceisteanna (1007)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1007. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health if the current tender process for season 2026/2027 will not be delayed by her or cancelled; the reason she would not consider the creation of a “Pathfinder” programme, as developed for the temporary usage of monoclonal antibody in RSV for the past two seasons (details supplied). [14554/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The National Immunisation Programme in Ireland is based on the advice of the National Immunisation Advisory Committee (NIAC). The committee's recommendations are based on the prevalence of the relevant disease in Ireland and international best practice in relation to immunisation. NIAC make recommendations on vaccination policy to my Department.

NIAC revise recommendations on an ongoing basis to allow for the introduction of new vaccines in Ireland, to incorporate findings from horizon scanning and to keep abreast of changes in the patterns of disease. NIAC continuously monitor global developments in the field of immunisation. The immunisation schedule, therefore, continues to be amended over time based on emerging evidence.

NIAC's annual workplan aims to address as many immunisation topics as possible whilst also remaining agile to address unanticipated events. The influenza chapter of the Immunisation Guidelines for Ireland is updated annually to incorporate the annual WHO recommendations for flu vaccine composition for the northern hemisphere.

In January 2026, NIAC formally commenced a review of recommendations regarding the use of newer and enhanced influenza vaccines (adjuvanted, high-dose, cell-based and recombinant vaccines) in eligible populations. Work on the evidence review process will continue over the coming months and will inform the influenza season 2027/2028.

The HSE is responsible for the implementation of the Influenza Vaccination Programme, in line with Department of Health policy and funding, which includes procurement of the vaccine in line with EU and National Procurement rules. Every year the WHO reviews global surveillance data and recommends the specific influenza strains that manufacturers should include in that season’s vaccine based on the flu strains that are considered most likely to circulate.

The HSE will carry out a procurement process in relation to the flu vaccine specific to the flu season 2026/2027. It is expected that NIAC recommended enhanced flu vaccines will be included in this procurement process. Only when that process is complete, will it be known what vaccines will be available for the coming flu season.

Health Services Staff

Ceisteanna (1008)

Brian Stanley

Ceist:

1008. Deputy Brian Stanley asked the Minister for Health if clarity will be provided regarding positions that were approved for primary care occupational therapy posts in Laois (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14563/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible.

Disability Services

Ceisteanna (1009)

Paul McAuliffe

Ceist:

1009. Deputy Paul McAuliffe asked the Minister for Health to provide an update on a speech and language assessment for a child (details supplied). [14587/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible.

Medical Aids and Appliances

Ceisteanna (1010)

Paul Lawless

Ceist:

1010. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Health if she will review the current system for accessing CPAP machines for patients with sleep apnoea, in light of cases where families are paying €118 per month in rental fees in addition to monthly medication costs, with limited support available under the drugs payment scheme; if she will consider introducing a model similar to Northern Ireland where CPAP machines are provided free of charge through primary care; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14610/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Health Service Executive (HSE) has statutory responsibility for medicine pricing and reimbursement decisions, in accordance with the Health (Pricing and Supply of Medical Goods) Act 2013. The HSE also has responsibility for the administration of the Community Drug Schemes, including the Drug Payment Scheme (DPS).

Under the DPS, no individual or family pays more than €80 a month towards the cost of approved prescribed medicines and medical appliances. The DPS is not means tested and is available to anyone ordinarily resident in Ireland. Further information can be found at: www2.hse.ie/services/schemes-allowances/drugs-payment-scheme/card/

The rental costs for a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines are included under the DPS. Further information, including how to claim, can be found at: www2.hse.ie/services/schemes-allowances/drugs-payment-scheme/refunds/

Medical Aids and Appliances

Ceisteanna (1011)

Paul Lawless

Ceist:

1011. Deputy Paul Lawless asked the Minister for Health if she will examine the financial burden placed on working families who do not qualify for a medical card but who face essential, lifelong medical costs such as CPAP rental and associated medication, particularly where the cost of supporting children in third-level education further reduces disposable income (details supplied); and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14611/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Drugs Payment Scheme (DPS) ensures that expenditure on approved prescribed medicines or medical appliances does not exceed a named threshold in any calendar month. The DPS is not means tested and is available to anyone ordinarily resident in Ireland.

Currently, the DPS threshold is €80, so no individual or family pays more than that a month on approved prescribed medicines or medical appliances. The DPS significantly reduces the cost burden for people with ongoing expenditure on medicines.

The Health Service Executive (HSE) has electronic claiming processes in place which enable pharmacies to submit claims in relation to services provided to patients whose family monthly medicines requirements exceed the DPS monthly threshold (currently €80).

In such circumstances the family pays the first €80 of the claim and the pharmacy submits the entire DPS record to the HSE at month end and the HSE pays the balance of the claim to the pharmacy based on the prices approved for medicines on the list of reimbursable items and the fees set out in legislation. DPS refund applications do not arise in such circumstances.

Patients registered under the DPS can apply for a refund where they opted to use more than one pharmacy to supply their family medicines needs or where they received items from their community pharmacy and other approved services provided by a supplier other than a community pharmacy (e.g. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or Oxygen treatment), and have paid in excess of the DPS threshold.

The HSE is committed to continuously improving its services and recognises that the provision of digital services offers significant advantages both for patients and the HSE. The HSE is developing an easy-to-use online refund application with upload capabilities to support the delivery of refunds by electronic fund transfer.

Health Services

Ceisteanna (1012)

Erin McGreehan

Ceist:

1012. Deputy Erin McGreehan asked the Minister for Health her plans to expand access to ADHD assessment services for adults in County Louth; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14613/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

ADHD has long been recognised as one of the most common psychiatric disorders in children and it is now known to persist into adulthood. Core symptoms include inattention, hyperactivity and impulsivity.

This National Clinical Programme is based on multi-disciplinary community teams to diagnose and treat ADHD in adults. As Minister, I'm proud to have launched the Model of Care for Adult ADHD and to have resourced the establishment of the teams envisioned by the Model of Care. The ADHD Programme is funded with total funding of over €5 million on a recurring annual basis. As a result, there are 8 teams are currently operational with the remaining teams in recruitment. This includes an ADHD team which covers Cavan/Monaghan/Louth/ Meath which opened in November 2025. Funding was secured by myself as Minister in Budget 2025 to facilitate the rolling out of the total number of ADHD teams envisaged in the Model of Care.

In relation to the additional specific information requested regarding the operation of the ADHD National Clinical Programme, as this is an operational matter, I have referred it to the HSE for direct reply to you.

Nursing Homes

Ceisteanna (1013)

Conor Sheehan

Ceist:

1013. Deputy Conor Sheehan asked the Minister for Health in inappropriate nursing home settings through the ‘Under 65 Programme’, by county, in each of the years 2023 to 2025, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14667/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible. As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible.

Nursing Homes

Ceisteanna (1014)

Conor Sheehan

Ceist:

1014. Deputy Conor Sheehan asked the Minister for Health the number of people who exited inappropriate nursing home settings through the ‘Under 65 Programme’, by county, in each of the years 2023 to 2025, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14668/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible.

Nursing Homes

Ceisteanna (1015)

Conor Sheehan

Ceist:

1015. Deputy Conor Sheehan asked the Minister for Health the total budget allocated to the ‘Under 65 Programme’ to get people out of inappropriate nursing home settings in each of the years 2023 to 2025, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [14669/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the Health Service Executive to respond to the Deputy directly, as soon as possible.

Health Service Executive

Ceisteanna (1016)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1016. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health whether she has sought or received any audit, validation, or data quality assurance reports concerning the accuracy of Patient Experience Time data used to record emergency department waiting times; the date of the most recent such review; whether error rates or data reliability concerns have been formally quantified; and if she will outline the governance framework in place to ensure the accuracy, validation, and publication standards of emergency department waiting time data at national and hospital level. [14671/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this is a service matter, I have asked the HSE to respond to the deputy directly.

Health Service Executive

Ceisteanna (1017)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1017. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health whether her Department has considered directing the Health Service Executive to publish disaggregated emergency department waiting time bands beyond 24 hours on a hospital-by-hospital basis; whether any policy decision has been taken not to publish such granular data; and the basis on which she satisfies herself that current reporting arrangements provide sufficient transparency regarding extended emergency department waits. [14672/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I would like to thank the deputy for his question. The HSE publishes a daily Urgent and Emergency Care (UEC) Report, which provides a site-by-site, "point-in-time" count of patients awaiting an inpatient bed at 8am. This report specifically highlights the number of patients waiting more than 24 hours following a decision to admit, with a dedicated category for vulnerable patients aged 75 and over.

Policy and operational decisions are informed by the daily analysis of a "large amount of data" beyond a single metric. While the 8 am trolley count is a "key metric," it is evaluated alongside other indicators to best understand the delivery of care.

Management has access to more granular data through the Demand and Capacity Visualisation Platform (HPVP). This tool provides real-time data and trends across all EDs, diagnostic services, and bed management to identify "bottlenecks" and "bed-flow blockages", allowing for immediate operational intervention. While standard public reports do not currently disaggregate wait times into specific bands beyond 24 hours, the Minister relies on the public 24-hour breach data, sophisticated internal real-time analytics, and statutory oversight by HIQA to satisfy herself that extended waits are transparently monitored and managed.

Health Service Executive

Ceisteanna (1018)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1018. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health whether her Department has issued any central written policy, circular, internal guidance note, or governance framework applicable across all line units concerning the oversight, compliance, and safeguarding obligations of non-statutory bodies funded directly by her Department, excluding bodies funded through or overseen by the HSE; and if so, to provide the title, date of issue, and confirmation as to whether such guidance remains in force. [14674/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I thank the Deputy for his question. The position regarding the two non-statutory bodies funded directly by the Department of Health has been comprehensively set out in the response to previous PQs ref: 10006/26 and 10007/26.

Departmental Bodies

Ceisteanna (1019)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1019. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health what formal mechanisms exist at Secretary General or Management Board level to ensure consistency of governance, reporting, and compliance standards across different departmental line units when administering direct funding to non-statutory bodies; whether such oversight arrangements are documented; and whether any consolidated compliance report is prepared at departmental level. [14675/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I thank the Deputy for his question. The position regarding the two non-statutory bodies funded directly by the Department of Health has been comprehensively set out in the response to previous PQs ref: 10006/26 and 10007/26.

Departmental Bodies

Ceisteanna (1020, 1021)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1020. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health the statutory, contractual, or policy basis her Department requires non-statutory bodies that are not aegis bodies of the Department to operate in line with the Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies; whether any internal legal advice was obtained regarding the applicability of that Code to such bodies; and whether any formal determination was made as to its legal status in this context. [14676/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

1021. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Health whether her Department conducts documented risk assessments prior to awarding direct funding to non-statutory bodies; whether a standardised risk assessment template is used; and whether such assessments are subject to review by the Department’s Internal Audit Unit. [14677/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 1020 and 1021 together.

I thank the Deputy for his question. The Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies aims to ensure commercial and non-commercial State Bodies meet the highest standards of corporate governance.

As previous outlined in response to PQ 13608/26, my Department currently funds two non-statutory bodies directly. The first, the Institute of Public Health (IPH), is a North/South Agency and is a company limited by guarantee (CLG). It is required to ensure compliance with relevant company law in both jurisdictions. Governance meetings between the two sponsor Departments occur on a quarterly basis.  The oversight agreement between the two sponsor Departments and the IPH has defined escalation procedures and points of contact. Their Code of Governance explicitly states: “….the spirit and aims of the Code of Practice can be applied in a proportionate manner to the Institute”.

The second non-statutory body which my Department funds directly is the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua). ISQua operates its Secretariat in Dublin, Ireland and my Department has entered into a multi-annual funding cycle effective from 1st April 2024 to 21st March 2028.

This partnership is underpinned by a Funding Agreement. Prior to the award of funding, a Grant Application was submitted by ISQua outlining the terms of engagement, rationale for support and proposed use of the grant. An assessment of the Grant Application was completed by the Department, and any concerns addressed.

ISQua provides information, in advance, to the Department on the purposes for which it proposes to use the Department funding and relevant evidence thereafter that the money was applied for the stated purposes. My Department maintains regular contact with ISQua, and formal meetings between the Department and ISQua provide an opportunity to address any possible deviations from the Funding Agreement.

My Department has Governance oversight of HSE, while the HSE has governance oversight of the S38 and S39 bodies. The HSE has a formal national governance framework within which such funding relationships are managed. As part of this governance framework, the HSE requires all grant-aided non-statutory agencies to submit their annual audited accounts to it. It is the responsibility of HSE to escalate issues regarding S38 and S39 bodies to the Department in the first instance with relevant Units in the Department assisting depending on the issue(s) involved.

Question No. 1021 answered with Question No. 1020.
Roinn