As the Deputy will be aware, through the Senior Cycle Redevelopment programme, the specifications for all Leaving Certificate Established curricular subjects are scheduled to be redeveloped by 2029, in annual groupings referred to as tranches.
Leaving Certificate English was included among the subjects constituting Tranche 2 scheduled for introduction in September 2026. These subjects include; Accounting, Construction Studies, Engineering, Geography, LCVP Link Modules, and Physical Education.
The specifications for all tranche 2 subjects, including English, have been approved by the Minister. The approved specification has been published and is available on curriculumonline.ie.
Timelines in respect of the introduction of the Tranche 2 subjects received careful consideration having regard to the planning, implementation and enactment aspects of each of the Tranche 2 specifications. Consequently in approving the specification, the then-Minister decided that enactment of the English specification will not proceed in school year 2026/27 as initially envisaged and, enactment will not be given effect before school year 2027/28.
In relation to the Deputy’s query on the inclusion of critical literacy in the revised Leaving Certificate English specification as published, my department has been advised by the NCCA as follows;
‘Critical literacy is a way of teaching students to read any text ... from a position in which the reader questions the intentions of the author, explores the issue from multiple perspectives, considers sociocultural or political conditions, and takes action to interrupt and change current conditions.’ (Adams, 2023)
Critical literacy has its roots in pedagogical theory, where students are invited to engage in reflection, challenge their own assumptions and take action in the world around them. It moves away from an idea of students as passive recipients of knowledge to active, critical participants in their learning, preparing them to be engaged democratic citizens.
In the work of the development group, one of the key considerations was to empower students to critically engage with the world around them; to ask questions of the texts they were presented with in order to combat bias, misinformation and disinformation. This empowering of students to challenge status quo, to ask questions of the power structures at work behind the texts and be active participants in the work around them, is the central tenet of critical literacy.
The group were also clear that they wanted to ground the specification in sound educational theory and so referenced the works of four writers (among many others) whose ideas they supported; including Freire, Foucault, Shor, and Janks. The four references are outlined below:
Paulo Freire’s ‘Education for critical consciousness’ (1973) reflects on his work as an educator in Brazil, teaching the poor and oppressed how to read and outlines his support of dialogic pedagogy and the emancipatory power of education.
Paul Michel Foucault, was a French historian, philosopher and literary critic who campaigned extensively against homophobia and racial prejudice and reshaped research into critical theory. His ‘Power/knowledge’ (1980) is an influential text in the development of literary theory and the concept of literary works being not just aesthetic but also a result of the networks of power that surround them.
Ira Shore’s ‘What is critical literacy?’ (1999), outlines exactly what is meant by critical literacy in the questioning of power relations, discourses and identities, originating in a Deweyan constructivist education and associated with active theory, where students become active agents in their own education and in the world around them.
Hilary Janks ‘The importance of critical literacy’ (2012) outlines the increasing importance of critical literacy in the world today and provides a concrete approach to critical literacy in the classroom that would be very relevant and useful for teachers of the subject.
The inclusion of these four references (rather than a broad support for the writings of these theorists) gives the specification a grounding in philosophical and pedagogical theories and links with the work of the teacher in the classroom to help empower students to discuss, challenge, reflect and act. This supports the embedding of the key competencies of senior cycle education where students are asked to think and solve problems, to work with others and participate in society.
The Deputy may also wish to note that the NCCA Subject Development Group which developed the specification, in line with established practice, included representatives of subject teachers in English and that the specifications underwent public consultation before their approval and publication.