Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 12 May 2026

Written Answers Nos. 913-932

Capital Expenditure Programme

Ceisteanna (913)

Brian Brennan

Ceist:

913. Deputy Brian Brennan asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if she will provide a list of all capital projects, including early years, childcare and disability infrastructure projects, delivered under the remit of her Department, and bodies under its aegis, which have been completed on time and within budget in the Wicklow Wexford constituency in each of the past five years, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [33962/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Department is currently collating the information requested and a reply will issue directly to the Deputy on this matter as soon as possible.

Child Protection

Ceisteanna (914)

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

914. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality further to Parliamentary Question No. 417 of 30 April 2026, the steps that will be taken to introduce a system of continuous monitoring and cross-setting accountability for individuals working with children; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34008/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, is a wholly independent body, under the aegis of the Department and is accountable to me as Minister through its Board.

This year, the Department is developing a new 3-year Performance Framework to replace the current Performance Framework which covers the period 2024-2026. This document provides the agency with policy guidance, direction, and prioritisation parameters for the preparation of its corporate plan in accordance with the Child and Family Agency Act 2013.

A range of robust processes and formal engagements between the Department and Tusla have been established to support the governance and oversight of Tusla.

Officials from the Department meet regularly with Tusla to monitor Tusla’s progress. The Department monitors and liaises with Tusla on an ongoing basis in relation to its policies, procedures, and guidelines across all their functions and service delivery areas. This ensures that issues or challenges are identified and addressed as quickly as possible. This is the fundamental basis for good governance and oversight and assists in ensuring that Tusla’s structures are robust, responsive, and capable of safeguarding every child in need. Details of various regular meetings are found below.

Along with senior Department officials, I schedule meetings with the Tusla Board on a regular basis over the course of the year to consider how Tusla is progressing with key areas in its annual business plan as well as speaking about important topical matters that arise. The Secretary General and the Child Policy and Tusla Governance Assistant Secretary General meet with the Tusla CEO and Tusla Director of Service Integration on a more frequent basis. Meetings between the Child Policy and Tusla Governance Division Assistant Secretary General, Heads of Departmental Units and the Tusla Executive Management Team generally take place every two months. In addition, there are regular governance and financial oversight meetings that take place as well as many other frequent bilateral meetings.

The role of Tusla’s Practice Assurance and Service Monitoring (PASM) Team is to provide objective assurance to the Tusla Chief Executive Officer, Tusla Executive Management Team, and the Tusla Board, as to the quality and safety of the Agency’s services in accordance with the requirements of national guidance, standards, and legislation. The PASM team are independent of the material and services which they analyse.

Using a collaborative approach with Tusla Operations, the PASM team is responsible for conducting an annual programme of practice audits and assurance reviews of Tusla services. The purpose of these reviews is to ensure that Tusla services are delivered in line with the requisite standards, regulations, and legislative requirements, and that service improvements are achieved in line with the recommendations of the Agency’s oversight bodies. The findings from these practice audits/assurance reviews are used to inform operational decision-making concerning quality improvement actions required, and to support and enable frontline service managers in achieving, verifying, and sustaining consistent service improvement.

In addition to its routine programme of practice audit and assurance reviews, the PASM team is requested from time to time to undertake internal case reviews. The purpose of these reviews is to examine a case where an issue of concern has been identified in relation to current or historic practice. The reviews undertaken are also intended to provide assurance in relation to current practice, governance, and oversight within the Agency and to identify whether specific service improvements are required. Where a review relates to historic practice which predates the Agency, the identified issues are cross checked against various current day audits and inspections to ensure in as much as possible that the same issues in the past are mitigated in the practice of today. The work of PASM in addition to other assurance mechanisms would be considered best practice by international standards.

The placement of children in alternative care is also governed by Regulations and Standards for Foster Care, Residential Care, and Special Care. These Regulations and Standards set out the detailed criteria against which Tusla is inspected, in its provision of alternative care services. The application of these Regulations and Standards promotes safe and high-quality practice in alternative care. Tusla’s Alternative Care Inspection and Monitoring Service (ACIMS) manages the registration and inspection of non-statutory Children’s Residential Services, as well as non-statutory Foster Care agencies. The Department of Children receives Tusla’s Alternative Care Inspection Monitoring inspection reports. Reports that are considered significantly non-compliant are reviewed to identify any practice issues which can be escalated where deemed necessary.

I am satisfied with the level of monitoring internally within Tusla regarding the provision of its services, including oversight of the valuable work that its employees undertake.

Capital Expenditure Programme

Ceisteanna (915)

Grace Boland

Ceist:

915. Deputy Grace Boland asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if she will provide a list of all capital projects, including early years, childcare and disability infrastructure projects, delivered under the remit of her Department, and bodies under its aegis, which have been completed on time and within budget in Fingal in each of the past five years, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34054/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Department is currently collating the information requested and a reply will issue directly to the Deputy on this matter as soon as possible.

Capital Expenditure Programme

Ceisteanna (916)

Micheál Carrigy

Ceist:

916. Deputy Micheál Carrigy asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality if she will provide a list of all capital projects, including early years, childcare and disability infrastructure projects, delivered under the remit of her Department, and bodies under its aegis, which have been completed on time and within budget in Longford in each of the past five years, in tabular form; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34083/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Department is currently collating the information requested and a reply will issue directly to the Deputy on this matter as soon as possible.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (917)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

917. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the average annual cost per child of a private residential care placement in 2024, 2025 and to date in 2026; and if she will provide the minimum, maximum and median cost per placement under current contractual arrangements. [34137/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (918)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

918. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality to set out the standardised national pricing bands or cost ceilings applied to private residential childcare placements under the current 2025-2028 contract; and the methodology used to determine those rates. [34138/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Thank you, Deputy, for your question. As this relates to an operational matter within Tusla, your question has been referred to Tusla to reply directly to you.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (919)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

919. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether Tusla publishes or internally maintains benchmark rates for private residential care placements; if so, to provide details; and if not, the basis on which value for money is assessed in the absence of such benchmarks. [34139/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Thank you Deputy, for your question. As this relates to an operational matter within Tusla, your question has been referred to Tusla to reply directly to you.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (920)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

920. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether Tusla requires private providers of residential childcare placements to disclose cost breakdowns, including staffing, overheads, property, and profit margins, as part of the tendering or contracting process; and if so, to provide details of same. [34140/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Thank you Deputy, for your question. As this relates to an operational matter within Tusla, your question has been referred to Tusla to reply directly to you.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (921)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

921. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether any cap, limit or oversight mechanism exists in respect of profit margins earned by private providers of residential childcare placements funded by the State; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34141/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Thank you Deputy for your question. As this relates to an operational matter within Tusla, your question has been referred to Tusla to reply directly to you.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (922)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

922. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether any comparative cost analysis has been undertaken between Tusla-operated residential care placements and privately operated placements; if so, to provide the findings; and if not, whether such analysis will be undertaken. [34142/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Thank you for this question.

May I refer you to my response to my response to your PQ reference 21244/26 which set out the following:- 

As a key cost driver in Tusla, residential care is subject to ongoing monitoring.

You may be aware that the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service supported by the Department of Children, Disability and Equality and Tusla previously conducted a spending review specifically looking at Tusla residential care costs.

See link below:

https://www.gov.ie/en/irish-government-economic-and-evaluation-service-igees/igees-publication/tusla-residential-care-costs/

This was a comprehensive look across the residential care landscape. Monitoring of costs in Residential Care is a feature of regular engagement between the Department, the Agency and the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation.

Tusla engages with the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General and provides them with material requested and necessary for audits to be performed and queries to be satisfied.

Departmental Contracts

Ceisteanna (923)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

923. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether the cost levels set in the 2024 tender process were benchmarked against other jurisdictions, including the United Kingdom; and if so, to provide details of such benchmarking exercise. [34143/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question refers to service matters, I have asked the Health Service Executive (HSE) to respond to the Deputy directly.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (924)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

924. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the average weekly and annual cost per child of Special Emergency Arrangements in 2024, 2025 and to date in 2026; and the total expenditure on such arrangements in each year; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [34144/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (925)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

925. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality to quantify the savings achieved following the introduction of the Special Emergency Arrangement rate card in December 2023; and the methodology used to calculate such savings. [34145/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (926)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

926. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the proportion of children in residential care currently placed in privately operated facilities; and the trend in such placements over the past five years. [34146/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (927, 929, 930, 931, 932)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

927. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether time-to-permanency is tracked as a formal key performance indicator at national level by her Department or by Tusla; and if not, the way in which system performance is measured in the absence of outcome-based metrics. [34159/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

929. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether responsibility for setting national policy on time-to-permanency outcomes for children in care rests with her Department; and if so, the policy framework currently governs same. [34161/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

930. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether her Department has undertaken any comparative analysis with other jurisdictions regarding time-to-permanency targets or standards in child protection systems; and if so, to provide details and findings. [34162/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

931. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether prolonged duration in State care without a permanency outcome is recognised within national policy as a risk factor for adverse long-term outcomes for children; and the measures in place to mitigate such risk. [34163/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

932. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality whether there is a requirement for periodic formal review at national level of cases where a child has been in State care for more than five years; and if so, the governance arrangements underpinning such reviews. [34164/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 927, 929, 930, 931 and 932 together.

Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, is required by law to be independent in its work as set out in Section 8 (11) of the Child and Family Agency Act. It would be inappropriate for the Department to interfere with the professional judgement of Tusla staff in specific cases, including in relation to permanency planning. The Department therefore does not specifically audit or review Tusla's decision-making in respect of permanency planning. Tusla’s permanency planning in respect of children in the care of the State focuses on ensuring children have stable and secure environment to reside in.

While Tusla acts as the guardian of children in care, care orders under the Act are granted by the Courts. Court oversight of the granting of care orders is a key aspect of upholding the rights of parents and families, and ensuring that children are taken into care only where it is found that they are unlikely to receive the care or protection they need unless a Court makes a care order in respect of that child.

All children in the care of the state deserve a permanent home and certainty about their future. In relation to data and reporting on the length of time children may spend in care before attaining permanency, it is important to note that permanency may look different for each and every child. While for some children permanency can mean adoption or a guardianship arrangements, for most children permanency entails an alternative care placement within the care of Tusla. A majority of these children are placed in foster care, which provides a loving and stable family environment.

Tusla publishes annual data in relation to children in care on its website: https://www.tusla.ie/publications/review-of-adequacy-reports/. This data includes information regarding the length of time children in care have spent in alternative care, at a given point in time. In addition, in 2022 the Department launched a research and data programme, Care Experiences: Journeys Through the Irish Care System, which is being run in close collaboration with the Child and Family Agency, Tusla. The Care Experiences Programme comprises a combination of primary research and administrative data analysis to examine and better understand the lives of children and young people in care and aftercare and adults who were in care as children, including permanency and their pathways through care more generally.

Tusla has advised that all placements of children in care are subject to review on a six-monthly basis for the first two years, and annually thereafter. These reviews consider and take account of the care plan for each child, including the permanency plan. Additionally, Tusla has developed a policy and operational document relating to permanency planning for children in care, the Pathways to Permanency Handbook. This document supports social work practitioners and decision makers in their aim to ensure stable and safe care placements for children.

Tusla has further advised that the objective of permanency planning is to provide children with the opportunity of reaching their full potential in a safe and secure base and secondly, to prevent drift in care when other more appropriate care solutions could be sought. A key component of permanency planning is concurrent planning which is an approach that involves social workers considering and pursuing all reasonable permanency options at the same time for children as soon as the children are admitted to care.

Where a child is in care for over two years or under a full care order and reunification is deemed unlikely then consideration is given to the various permanency options such as:

• placement with extended family under guardianship

• placement with relatives

• long term foster care

• fostering to adoption

Bringing a child into the care of the State and maintaining them there is a significant matter, which requires careful consideration of the specific circumstances of a child and their family. This consideration, whether by the Child and Family Agency or the Courts in relation to orders under the Act, must also have regard to the constitutional rights of all parties as they arise in each individual case. Within this context, the Department is advancing proposals within the Child Care (Amendment) Bill 2025 to support permanency for children in alternative care. This includes proposals to impose a maximum duration on Interim Care Orders and amendments to clarify the criteria and purpose of Voluntary Care Arrangements, which will be subject to regular review.

Children in Care

Ceisteanna (928)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

928. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Children, Disability and Equality the number of children currently in State care who have been in care for more than two years; more than five years; and more than ten years, and whether these duration cohorts are subject to any specific policy intervention or review mechanism. [34160/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As this question relates to operational information held by Tusla, the Child and Family Agency, the question has been referred to the Agency to reply directly to the Deputy.

Question No. 929 answered with Question No. 927.
Question No. 930 answered with Question No. 927.
Question No. 931 answered with Question No. 927.
Question No. 932 answered with Question No. 927.
Roinn