Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 13 May 2026

Written Answers Nos. 141-160

Legislative Process

Ceisteanna (141)

Cian O'Callaghan

Ceist:

141. Deputy Cian O'Callaghan asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration his position regarding delays in the implementation of the Court Proceedings Delays Act 2024; whether the Minister is concerned that such delays have left affected individuals without access to compensation; and further, given statutory requirements under the Central Bank Act that certain confirmation proceedings be heard and determined within three months; how a case (details supplied) could arise where an individual was subject to a Central Bank prohibition for a period of over three years pending a High Court decision; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35540/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

As the Deputy will appreciate, I am precluded from commenting on individual cases.

Under the provisions of the Courts Service Act 1998, management of the courts is the responsibility of the Courts Service, which is independent in exercising its functions. The scheduling of court cases and the allocation of court business is a matter for the Presidents of the Courts and the presiding judges who are, under the Constitution, independent in the exercise of their judicial functions.

The Court Proceedings (Delays) Act 2024 provides parties with a right to conclusion of proceedings within a reasonable time. It provides for the establishment of an independent assessment process, to assess claims for breach of that right, and where appropriate, an award of compensation.

Arrangements to operationalise the requirements of the Act are currently being finalised. The recruitment process for personnel necessary to give effect to the Act is at an advanced stage (including the posts of Chief Assessor and Court Delays Assessors), with commencement of the Act scheduled for later this year.

An Garda Síochána

Ceisteanna (142)

Mark Ward

Ceist:

142. Deputy Mark Ward asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of fines that have been issued by county/Garda division for non-compliance of the Road Traffic (Electric Scooters) Regulations, for the years 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date;; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35556/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Garda Commissioner is responsible for the management and administration of An Garda Síochána under section 33 of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024, which includes all operational policing matters, such as the management of the Fixed Charge Processing System. 

Since the introduction of e-scooter legislation on 20 May 2024, there have been 1,694 Fixed Charge Notices issued for these offences. The table below has been provided to me by the Garda authorities and provides a breakdown of these offences by division. 

Figures are based on incidents which occurred from 20 May 2024 to 30 April 2026, inclusive. Figures of less than ten are not disclosed for data protection reasons as low numbers could be locally identifiable. Consequently an annualised breakdown has not been provided.

Division

FCNs Issued

Clare/Tipperary

34

Cork City

48

Cork County

25

DMR Eastern

14

DMR North Central

189

DMR Northern

85

DMR South Central

306

DMR Southern

85

DMR Western

84

Donegal

21

Galway

81

Kerry

50

Kildare/Carlow

222

Laois/Offaly

85

Limerick

38

Louth/Cavan/Monaghan

86

Mayo/Roscommon/Longford

38

Meath/Westmeath

13

Sligo/Leitrim

20

Waterford/Kilkenny

94

Wexford/Wicklow

76

Grand Total

1,694

 

 

 

Departmental Data

Ceisteanna (143)

Mark Ward

Ceist:

143. Deputy Mark Ward asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of e-scooters that have been confiscated for non-compliance of the Road Traffic (Electric Scooters) Regulations, for the years 2024, 2025 and 2026 to date; by county/Garda division; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35557/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Our road safety strategy takes a whole of government approach and is a shared responsibility. Development and implementation of road traffic legislation and policy falls within the remit of my colleague Darragh O'Brien TD, the Minister for Transport, and the vital role of enforcing road traffic laws is carried out by An Garda Síochána.

Gardaí have significant legislative powers to combat the antisocial and dangerous misuse of  e-scooters, e-bikes and scramblers and other such vehicles and I am assured that An Garda Síochána continues to adopt a proactive approach in addressing this issue.

Road traffic legislation provides for the detention, removal, storage and subsequent release or disposal of electric scooters by an Garda Síochána.

I am informed by Garda authorities that based on reported PULSE incidents of ‘Vehicle Detained’ and ‘Property Seized’ the following table describes the number of incidents in which e-scooters were seized or detained nationally in 2024 and 2025.

 -

2024

2025

Incidents where e-scooters were seized or detained

326

817

These figures are based on incidents which occurred from 1 January 2024 to 31 December 2025, inclusive. Figures for ‘seized or detained’ above are for those vehicles seized or detained under the incident types of ‘Vehicle Detained’, ‘Vehicle Detained Under Sec 41’ and ‘Property Seized'.

The information includes incidents where more than one vehicle was detained or seized. All information above is based upon operational data from the Fixed Charge Processing System and PUSLE system and is liable to change.

I am advised by Garda authorities that an exercise is currently being undertaken to review data on vehicles seized and detained in 2026 and that An Garda Síochána will update my Department when the exercise is complete.

Prison Service

Ceisteanna (144, 145, 146, 147)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

144. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to outline the full circumstances surrounding the death of prisoner (details supplied) while in custody, including the timeline of events and the location in which the death occurred. [35574/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

145. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the investigations that are currently underway into the death of prisoner (details supplied), including any involvement of An Garda Síochána, the Irish Prison Service, or the Inspector of Prisons, and the expected timeline for their completion. [35575/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

146. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the level of supervision, healthcare, and mental health supports were provided to a prisoner (details supplied) while in custody; and whether he had been identified as vulnerable or at risk. [35576/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

147. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether any failures in prison conditions, monitoring, or duty of care have been identified; and what actions or policy changes are being taken in response to this incident (details supplied). [35577/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 144, 145, 146 and 147 together.

I would firstly like to express my sympathies to the family of the deceased individual in question.

All deaths of prisoners within prisons are notified to An Garda Síochána, who investigate where circumstances warrant, in addition to an inquest held by the relevant Coroner.

All prisoner deaths, including deaths that occur within one month of temporary release, are subject to an independent investigation by the Inspector of Prisons. As this death in custody is currently the subject of investigation by An Garda Síochána and the Inspector of Prisons, it would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.

Question No. 145 answered with Question No. 144.
Question No. 146 answered with Question No. 144.
Question No. 147 answered with Question No. 144.

International Protection

Ceisteanna (148, 149, 150, 151)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

148. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the total number of incidents recorded in IPAS accommodation centres in each of the past five years; and to provide a breakdown of those incidents by category, including but not limited to verbal abuse, physical assault, threats or intimidation, damage to property, substance related incidents, and other behavioural breaches; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35595/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

149. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of recorded incidents in IPAS accommodation centres in each of the past five years in which harm occurred to another person; the nature of that harm (physical injury, threat of violence, sexual assault, or other); whether the injured party was a resident, staff member, contractor or member of the public; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35596/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

150. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of incidents in IPAS accommodation centres that were referred to An Garda Síochána in each of the past five years; the category of incident involved in each referral; and if he will outline, where available, the outcomes of those referrals, including arrests, charges, prosecutions, or no further action. [35597/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

151. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration following incidents involving breaches of house rules or behavioural issues in IPAS accommodation centres in each of the past five years, the number of individuals that were issued warnings, relocated to another centre, had reception conditions amended or had accommodation withdrawn entirely; and to provide a breakdown by incident category. [35598/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 148, 149, 150 and 151 together.

IPAS policy is to record all incidents, however minor. Incidents that arise in centres are defined and set out in IPAS policies, from a broad scale of general, minor issues related to complaints about behaviour or noise, to incidents considered critical in that they relate to mental health or self-harm incidents, including the unexpected death of a resident.

When any incident occurs, IPAS teams engage with centre management to resolve the issue at hand. In this regard, the Department routinely engages with all providers in relation to incident response and policy compliance.

The Department also carries out regular inspections of centres to ensure policies and procedures are in place that comply with the Critical Incident Policy.

Department records are not collated to allow a breakdown of specific details as outlined in the Deputy's questions.

Please see the following table updated to include statistics on incidents recorded in IPAS accommodation centres, dating back to 2021.

  Year

Incidents

Critical Incidents

Warning Letters

Transfers

2021

5

14

3

0

2022

766

37

659

110

2023

2,109

50

1,559

177

2024

4,168

55

3,170

521

2025

5,725

62

4,127

544

2026 to date

2,568

27

1,909

239

It should be noted when reviewing the statistics above that the number of people living in IPAS accommodation has increased very significantly over the last 5 years.

Current resident numbers are approximately 33,000. Resident numbers at the end of 2021 were just over 7,000.

Centre management in all IPAS centres have an ongoing working relationship with the local Gardaí. If there is ever any concern in relation to acts of violence or other criminal activity in any IPAS setting, An Garda Síochána are contacted.

In instances where there are serious or repeated breaches of the house rules, consideration may be given under Section 7 of the Regulations to amending the reception conditions afforded to a resident. This involves withdrawing IPAS accommodation.

In circumstances where reception conditions are amended, the person will be provided with a letter from IPAS explaining why their reception conditions have been amended, that no further IPAS accommodation will be provided. They are also informed of their right to appeal the decision within 10 working days by email.

I can confirm accommodation was withdrawn from 61 people in 2024, 49 people in 2025, and 14 people in 2026.

Data on operational actions by An Garda Síochána or convictions achieved against persons involved in threatening violent behaviour in IPAS centres as requested is not collated by my Department, nor following enquiries is it available from the Courts Service.

Question No. 149 answered with Question No. 148.
Question No. 150 answered with Question No. 148.
Question No. 151 answered with Question No. 148.

International Protection

Ceisteanna (152)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

152. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration where IPAS accommodation is withdrawn due to behavioural issues, the arrangements, if any, that are made to prevent homelessness; whether individuals are referred to local authorities, emergency accommodation, or support services; whether any assessment of risk to the individual or public is carried out prior to withdrawal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35599/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Under the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018, International Protection Applicants are provided with material reception conditions, including housing, food, clothing and a Daily Expenses Allowance (DEA).

International protection applicants do not have access to standard social welfare, housing benefits or emergency homeless accommodation.

Not all international protection applicants take up IPAS accommodation, nor are they obliged to, and some applicants make their own accommodation arrangements.

When people seeking international protection take up an offer of accommodation at an IPAS accommodation centre, they are provided with the ‘IPAS House Rules’ which explains the rules and procedures that are designed to make reception and accommodation centres safe and effective.

Where a resident is repeatedly in breach of the house rules or, following a particularly serious breach, IPAS may relocate them to another accommodation centre. Usually there are a series of reminders about the house rules and or warnings.? If breaches continue, it can be necessary to relocate people following repeated warnings.

In these circumstances IPAS engages directly with the people concerned and the centre management. Any resident who is moved to another centre is required to follow the house rules at that centre.

In instances where there are serious or repeated breaches of the house rules, consideration may be given under Section 7 of the Regulations to amending the reception conditions afforded to a resident. This involves withdrawing IPAS accommodation.

In circumstances where reception conditions are amended, the person will be provided with a letter from IPAS explaining why their reception conditions have been amended, that no further IPAS accommodation will be provided. They are also informed of their right to appeal the decision within 10 working days by email.

Cross-Border Co-operation

Ceisteanna (153)

Matt Carthy

Ceist:

153. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he has plans to establish a formal cross-Border mechanism with the Department of Justice in the North of Ireland to provide for the mutual recognition and enforcement of domestic violence protection orders, including restraining orders and safety orders, in order to ensure that such orders remain effective when a victim or perpetrator crosses the Border; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35600/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This Government is absolutely committed to combatting domestic, sexual and gender-based violence (DSGBV) in all its forms, and I am acutely aware that such abuse does not stop at our borders.

The Deputy will be aware that both Ireland and the United Kingdom are parties to the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters.

The Deputy refers specifically to restraining orders and safety orders and, depending on the nature of the order made, it may be possible to seek recognition and enforcement of such an order in another state which is a party to that Convention, including in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Where the person named in an order violates the conditions set out, the matter should be reported to the relevant police service.

In the area of private international law, in additional to ongoing bilateral engagement, both Ireland and the UK engage at the annual HCCH Conference on General Affairs and Policy which facilitates fruitful discussions on the various instruments which apply to both countries. In that context, preliminary work has started on exploring the possibility of an instrument on the recognition and enforcement of protection orders.

Further, officials in my Department who work on DSGBV issues regularly engage with their counterparts in the UK and with criminal justice agencies from both jurisdictions. These engagements take place both formally through the Victims Policy Advisory Group and through bilateral meetings to facilitate valuable information sharing and the exchange on best practices to enhance co-operation and consistency in our approach.

Departmental Data

Ceisteanna (154, 155, 156, 157)

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

154. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether he receives regular written or statistical reports on the number and status of individuals who have been refused permission to remain in the State but remain present in the State; and whether such reports include information on compliance with reporting requirements and known whereabouts. [35616/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

155. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the monitoring arrangements that are in place for individuals subject to deportation orders who remain in the State pending removal; the number of such individuals that are currently required to report to An Garda Síochána; the number that are recorded as non compliant with reporting or residency requirements; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35618/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

156. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration in the case where individuals are subject to deportation orders, whether his Department tracks homelessness or destitution among this cohort; whether he is satisfied that the State has adequate visibility of the living circumstances of individuals awaiting removal; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35619/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Peadar Tóibín

Ceist:

157. Deputy Peadar Tóibín asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of individuals currently subject to deportation orders that are under active management by the Garda National Immigration Bureau; the average time between the signing of a deportation order and enforcement; the principal reasons for non enforcement; and whether resource or capacity constraints are a factor. [35620/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 154, 155, 156 and 157 together.

It is a central priority for me that Ireland’s immigration system is robust and rules based. The enforcement aspects of our laws, including deportation orders, are an essential requirement for the system to work effectively and to ensure that there is confidence in the application of our legislation in this area. The removal of people who are involved in criminality and those who are a danger to society is a priority for me as Minister.

A deportation order is a legal order to leave the State. The enforcement of a deportation order is an operational matter for the Garda National Immigration Bureau (GNIB) and my Department works closely with the GNIB to progress arrangements for the removal of people subject to deportation orders. If a person issued with a deportation order does not leave the State independently then they are required to present to the GNIB in accordance with the conditions of their deportation order.

Each deportation order is accompanied by a letter or notice that informs the person of their obligations and requirements, including the obligation to present to the GNIB at a particular time and date. Other requirements are outlined in the letter, such as the requirement to reside at their address pending their removal and the requirement to co-operate with the GNIB and produce any travel document to facilitate their removal from the State.

The statistical data requested by the Deputy on the number of people currently under active management by GNIB, the duration between issuance and effecting of a deportation order, and the number of people non-complaint with residency requirements is not stored by my Department in a manner that is readily available. Such information is available to my Department, however, to accurately provide statistical information would require the manual examination of thousands of cases and such an examination would require a disproportionate amount of time to compile.

Deportations are costly and complex to enforce. It is the preferred option to return people voluntarily and my Department has a voluntary return programme to assist people to return prior to the issuance of a deportation order. A person can only avail of voluntary return before a deportation order is issued and I have increased resources into this programme to enable individuals who wish to return before a deportation order is issued to them.

If a person does not remove themselves from the State following the issuance of a deportation order, they will be removed, and my Department has taken action to significantly improve immigration enforcement measures and increase removals.

The number of deportation orders signed in 2024 (2,403) increased by 180% compared to 2023 (857). In 2025, 4,700 deportation orders were signed, an increase of 96% compared to 2024.1,712 deportation orders have been signed up to 08 May 2026.

In 2024, 1,122 people departed from the State under various mechanisms (i.e. enforced deportation, voluntary return etc.). In 2025, 2,111 people had their departure confirmed through these pathways, an increase of 88% compared to 2024. Up to 08 May 2026, 759 people have departed the State through these pathways.

In 2025, six charter flight operations removed 205 people from the State. Of these, five operations to non-EU destinations removed 182 people who were subject to deportation orders and one operation removed 23 EU citizens on grounds of criminality.

Two charter operations to date in 2026 have seen the removal of 96 people from the State, including 33 EU citizens who were removed on grounds of criminality.

The tables below detail the number of deportation orders signed, as well as the number enforced, from 2020 up to 08 May 2026.

It is the case that a significant number of individuals who were subject to deportation orders have left the State without notifying the relevant authorities; however, as there are no routine exit checks at Irish borders, it is not possible to definitely provide the number of people who have or have not complied with an order. I am, however, informed that the GNIB has reviewed a large sample of cases of people subject to deportation orders; their inquiries suggest a very significant number of these individuals have left the State.

I am further advised that the resourcing requirements of the GNIB is closely monitored on an ongoing basis to ensure the Bureau is in a position to carry out its functions in an effective manner.

Table 1 and Table 2

Question No. 155 answered with Question No. 154.
Question No. 156 answered with Question No. 154.
Question No. 157 answered with Question No. 154.

Capital Expenditure Programme

Ceisteanna (158)

Peter Roche

Ceist:

158. Deputy Peter Roche asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he will provide a list of all capital projects including Garda stations, courthouses, prison and immigration-related infrastructure delivered under the remit of his Department, and bodies under its aegis, which have been completed on time and within budget in Galway in each of the past five years, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35659/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It has not been possible to collate the information requested by the Deputy in the time available. I will write to the Deputy directly once the information is to hand.

Legislative Measures

Ceisteanna (159)

Carol Nolan

Ceist:

159. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the legislation under which his Department can acquire residential houses to be used to accommodate persons in need of emergency accommodation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35665/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS) is currently accommodating over 33,000 residents in 305 International Protection accommodation centres around the country.

Currently over 88% of accommodation capacity is provided through commercial providers and in sourcing accommodation over recent years the State has worked to avoid competing significantly with the residential property sector.

Whether commercially contracted or State-owned, the great majority of IPAS accommodation centres are located in group settings in larger properties, like former hotels, guesthouses, commercial and institutional buildings. A small proportion of more vulnerable applicants who may have special reception needs may be accommodated in smaller scale properties.

In line with the Programme for Government 2025 and the Comprehensive Accommodation Strategy for International Protection applicants approved in 2024, the State is working to develop more State-owned International Protection accommodation and reduce reliance on commercial contracted accommodation. This includes the development of in-community accommodation for more vulnerable applicants for whom group accommodation would not be suitable.

The Department of Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth purchased 37 in-community properties for vulnerable international protection applicants. 34 of these properties are being deployed to meet the needs of vulnerable cohorts of applicants. Three of these properties are currently under review for alternative uses outside of International Protection accommodation.

The provision of International Protection accommodation is required under the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018. The sourcing or purchase of properties for international protection purposes is subject to appropriate oversight and approval, but does not require legislation.

Breakdown of type of Property:

Type of Property

Number

One Bed Apartment

1

Two Bed Apartment

5

Two Bed House

4

Three Bed House

20

Four Bed House

5

10 Bed

1

12 Bed

1

Total

37

Since 2024, IPAS has not published details of the specific locations, resident profile, and occupancy of our individual accommodation centres. This is to preserve the privacy, safety and wellbeing of residents and staff.

Immigration Status

Ceisteanna (160)

Carol Nolan

Ceist:

160. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the proportion of international protection applicants classified as minors who presented to IPO offices without any or valid documentation; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [35666/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I am fully committed to ensuring that Ireland’s International Protection system is robust and rules based, and that our borders are protected.

The establishment of a person’s identity and nationality is an important feature of our immigration processes. This is especially so in the context of persons who make a claim for international protection.

All applicants aged 14 years and above who enter the international protection process are fingerprinted and photographed. These fingerprints are checked against Eurodac, an EU database which stores the fingerprints of asylum applicants and those who have been found to cross borders illegally.

If a person indicates or is identified as being in need of international protection they are admitted to the international protection process, regardless of whether they are in possession of travel documents.

When applications are lodged at the International Protection Office (IPO), information provided by applicants in support of their application, including documents concerning their identity, are recorded as part of the applicants file. While the IPO holds information on documents presented on foot of, or in support of, each individual application for international protection, this information is utilised in the examination of the individual application only. Therefore, it is not possible to the provide the information requested by the Deputy.

Under the provisions of the International Protection Act 2015, Section 14 requires the International Protection Office to refer an unaccompanied minor to Tusla. Tusla then carry out an assessment for eligibility for services under the Childcare Acts. Where Tusla find that the applicant is not an unaccompanied minor (UAM), the applicant is returned to the IPO to make their application as an adult. It remains open to the applicant to request a re-assessment based on submission of a valid form of identity which supports these assertions.

The table below shows the number of referrals from the IPO to Tusla for people that have presented as unaccompanied minors from 2023 to date.

 -

IPO Referrals to Tusla

2023

184

2024

250

2025

336

2026*

72

*to 11 May 2026

Roinn