Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Tuesday, 19 May 2026

Written Answers Nos. 637-661

Heritage Projects

Ceisteanna (637)

Albert Dolan

Ceist:

637. Deputy Albert Dolan asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the current and planned development works at the Martello Tower at Meelick, County Galway; the proposals to extend the existing public walkway to provide safe and direct access to the Martello Tower; the plans to provide an accessible viewing point of the River Shannon from the top of the tower; the current status of design drawings or feasibility studies for these works; the anticipated timelines for delivery of these projects; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37637/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Waterways Ireland is a North South Implementation Body established under the British Irish Agreement of 10 April 1998. It is funded by my Department and the Department for Infrastructure in Northern Ireland.

The detailed information requested in relation the development works planned by Waterways Ireland at the Martello Tower at Meelick is not held in my Department. Arrangements have been put in place by all bodies under the aegis of my Department to facilitate the provision of information directly to members of the Oireachtas. This provides a speedy, efficient and cost effective system to address queries directly to the relevant bodies. The contact email address for Waterways Ireland is oireachtas@waterwaysireland.org.

Question No. 638 answered with Question No. 183.

Departmental Bodies

Ceisteanna (639, 640)

Claire Kerrane

Ceist:

639. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the role his Department has on the Developer Provided Infrastructure (DPI) Steering Group; the number of times this group met in 2025 and to-date in 2026; the role his Department places in oversight on this Group; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37680/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Claire Kerrane

Ceist:

640. Deputy Claire Kerrane asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the number of housing estates that have had issues resolved via the Developer Provided Infrastructure (DPI) Steering Group; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37681/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 639 and 640 together.

The Government decided, effective 1 January 2024, that Uisce Éireann, as the national water utility, is responsible for the remediation of developer-provided wastewater and water infrastructure (DPI), to ensure consistent governance, delivery standards, and efficient resolution of legacy infrastructure issues across the country.

My Department’s role is to coordinate the implementation of the Government decision and engagement between Uisce Éireann and the County and City Management Association (CCMA), representing the local authorities. The DPI Steering Group met seven times in 2025 and once to date in 2026 as part of regular engagement.

The scope and delivery of individual projects is a matter for Uisce Éireann, in consultation with the relevant local authorities, in line with agreed governance arrangements.

Information on the number of housing estates where issues have been resolved is a matter for Uisce Éireann.

To support public representatives, Uisce Éireann has established a dedicated team to respond to queries regarding DPI projects. The team can be contacted by email at oireachtasmembers@water.ie or by telephone at 0818 578 578 and is committed to providing timely updates on project progress.

Question No. 640 answered with Question No. 639.

Defective Building Materials

Ceisteanna (641, 642, 643, 644)

Charles Ward

Ceist:

641. Deputy Charles Ward asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if landlords with tenancies in place prior to 1 March 2026 will continue to retain the right to terminate a tenancy under section 34 of the Residential Tenancies Acts 2004 to 2025 where vacant possession is required to carry out remediation works to dwellings affected by defective concrete blocks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37710/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Charles Ward

Ceist:

642. Deputy Charles Ward asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the measures that are in place to ensure that landlords are not placed in a position whereby tenants remain in dwellings deemed unsafe due to defective concrete blocks or where substantial remediation works pose a health and safety risk; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37711/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Charles Ward

Ceist:

643. Deputy Charles Ward asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the protections and supports available to tenants residing in dwellings affected by defective concrete blocks where remediation works require temporary or permanent vacation of the property; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37712/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Charles Ward

Ceist:

644. Deputy Charles Ward asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage if specific guidance has issued, or is planned to issue, to landlords, tenants and the Residential Tenancies Board regarding the interaction between tenancy protections introduced from 1 March 2026 and the operation of the defective concrete blocks grant scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37713/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 641 to 644, inclusive, together.

The Remediation of Dwellings Damaged by the Use of Defective Concrete Blocks Act 2022 (as amended) which contains the current Defective Concrete Blocks Grant Scheme commenced on 22 June 2023, with related Regulations being adopted on 29 June 2023.

The Grant Scheme applies to the owners of dwellings located in designated local authorities, which are damaged due to the use of defective concrete blocks.

The dwelling must be:

• the individual's principal private residence, that is, a house which an individual owns (or co-owns) and occupies as his or her only or main residence;

• a rented dwelling with a registered tenancy that was registered with the Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) on or before 1 November 2021 subject to a maximum of one rental property per household.

Relevant RTB registered properties are subject to a charging order that creates a charge over the relevant dwelling, equal to the payments made to the landlord who is the relevant owner for a period of 20 years.

The Residential Tenancies Acts 2004 to 2026 (RTA) regulate the landlord-tenant relationship in the residential rental sector and set out the rights and obligations of landlords and tenants. The Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) was established as an independent statutory body under the RTA to operate a national tenancy registration system and to facilitate the resolution of disputes between landlords and tenants. Section 34 of the RTA provides that a landlord must state a reason for the termination in any notice served, in accordance with the allowable grounds for terminations.

The RTA provides that where a landlord terminates a tenancy because he/she needs vacant possession to substantially refurbish/renovate the property, that property must be offered back to the former tenant upon completion of the works. Also, such a notice of termination must contain or be accompanied by a written certificate of a registered professional, such as an architect, engineer or surveyor, stating that the proposed substantial refurbishment/renovation works would pose a health and safety risk necessitating vacation by the tenants and that such a risk would be likely to exist for at least three weeks.

For existing tenancies (i.e. those in place on 28 February 2026 and continuing to exist), landlords will continue to have the right to terminate a tenancy in line with the provisions of the RTA, as they applied on 28 February 2026. The tenancy changes from 1 March 2026 do not apply retrospectively and the Defective Concrete Blocks Grant Scheme will operate, as usual, for a relevant rented dwelling.

Question No. 642 answered with Question No. 641.
Question No. 643 answered with Question No. 641.
Question No. 644 answered with Question No. 641.

Defective Building Materials

Ceisteanna (645, 646)

Pádraig Mac Lochlainn

Ceist:

645. Deputy Pádraig Mac Lochlainn asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage when he will bring forward the necessary regulations that will allow for side-by-side construction of homes under the defective concrete blocks grant scheme to allow some families to remain in their defective home while a new home is built on an adjacent site. [37729/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Pearse Doherty

Ceist:

646. Deputy Pearse Doherty asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage to provide an update for defective concrete blocks regulations for side-by-side construction; when they will be implemented; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37734/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 645 and 646 together.

The Remediation of Dwellings Damaged by the Use of Defective Concrete Blocks (Amendment) Bill 2025 was initiated in Dáil Éireann on 2 December 2025, passed both Houses of the Oireachtas and was subsequently signed into law by the President, thereby becoming an Act, on the 23 December 2025.

A number of amendments came into operation on 25 February 2026, with the related Regulations also adopted on 25 February 2026.

Further Regulations relating to additional amendments contained in the 2025 (Amendment) Act are currently under draft and at an advanced stage. These Regulations include the amendment that provides for an application of an adjacent remediation option in particular circumstances. I expect to adopt these Regulations and make the appropriate Commencement Order shortly.

Question No. 646 answered with Question No. 645.

Defective Building Materials

Ceisteanna (647)

Eoin Ó Broin

Ceist:

647. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the number of defective concrete block grant recipients that have applied for the increased remediation option grant in each county that the grant scheme operates; the number of those recipients who have been awarded the maximum 10% increase; the number in each county who have received less than the 10% and those who have received an increase of less than 5%, in tabular form. [37764/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Remediation of Dwellings Damaged by the use of Defective Concrete Blocks Act 2022 as amended by the Act of 2025 underpins the Grant Scheme which provides grant funding to people with homes affected by defective concrete blocks.

General statistics relating to the Defective Concrete Blocks (DCB) Scheme can be found on my Department's website at the following link:

www.gov.ie/en/department-of-housing-local-government-and-heritage/collections/statistics-for-defective-concrete-block-scheme/

Local authorities have responsibility for the administration of the Scheme. This includes the initial validation of applications, notifying homeowners of the Housing Agency's determinations on damage threshold, the appropriate remediation option and grant amount, determination of the grant payable for alternative accommodation and storage costs and immediate repair works and the subsequent payment of grants to successful applicants.

Statistics relating to your request are not held by my Department and queries of this nature should be directed to the relevant designated local authority.

Question No. 648 answered with Question No. 618.

Approved Housing Bodies

Ceisteanna (649)

Eoin Ó Broin

Ceist:

649. Deputy Eoin Ó Broin asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage his views on recent developments at an organisation (details supplied); and if he is satisfied that the funding provided by his Department is being managed in an appropriate manner. [37772/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

My Department has regular ongoing engagements with all AHBs across a breadth of schemes which fund proposals for social and affordable housing projects. Any decisions made by my Department regarding whether to approve funding for such schemes takes many variables into consideration. Due to commercial sensitivities, neither I, nor my Department comment on the status of funding approvals for any specific AHB or schemes.

Regarding the regulation of Approved Housing Bodies, the Approved Housing Body Regulatory Authority was established in February 2021 to oversee the effective governance, financial management and performance of all voluntary and co-operative housing bodies, in accordance with the legal framework set out in the Housing (Regulation of Approved Housing Bodies) Act 2019 (the Act). ABHRA delivers sectoral regulation, overseeing all AHBs adherence to Regulatory Standards, which include financial, governance, asset management and tenant management standards.

AHBRA is an independent body and the regulatory regime which is in place since 2021 is demonstrating measurable impact. AHBRA’s annual monitoring and assessment programmes are more frequent and targeted in nature, to ensure standards are being adhered to. Since March 2025, AHBRA has published assessment outcomes, improving transparency and accountability across the sector.

Quarrying Sector

Ceisteanna (650)

Malcolm Byrne

Ceist:

650. Deputy Malcolm Byrne asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the current planning laws regarding the development of quarries; the plans to reform these; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37817/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Unless specifically exempted under the Planning and Development Act 2000 (the Act of 2000) or the corresponding Regulations, all development requires planning permission. Planning authorities and An Coimisiún Pleanála (the Commission), as appropriate, grant planning permission for development on land, such as a quarry.

When making a decision on a planning application for a quarry, the planning authority or the Commission, as appropriate, is required to have regard to a number of matters, including the relevant development plan, and may attach appropriate conditions to a planning permission on a case by case basis. My Department issued statutory guidelines under section 28 of the Act of 2000 to planning authorities on Quarrying and Ancillary Activities in April 2004. Planning authorities and the Commission must have regard to these guidelines when considering a planning application for a quarry.

An environmental impact assessment is required to be carried out prior to granting consent for certain categories of development that are specified in Schedule 5 of the Planning and Development Regulations 2001. The categories of development relevant to quarries include:

• Quarries and open-cast mining where the surface of the site exceeds 25 hectares ((Part 1, class 19);

• Extraction of stone, gravel, sand or clay, where the area of extraction would be greater than 5 hectares (Part 2, class 2 (b));

• All extraction of minerals within the meaning of the Minerals Development Acts, 1940 to 1999 (Part 2, class 2 (c)) ; and

• All installations for the manufacture of cement (Part 2, class 5 (b)).

Sub-threshold development listed in Schedule 5 may also require an environmental impact assessment if the planning authority or the Commission determines that the proposed development would likely have a significant effect on the environment.

Proposed development (including quarries) situated near or on a 'European site' requires screening for appropriate assessment to assess if that development is likely to have a significant effect on the site. Where an appropriate assessment is carried out, permission may only be granted after having determined that the proposed development will not adversely affect the integrity of a European site.

As the Planning and Development Act 2024 (Act of 2024) provides enhanced enforcement provisions for certain activities, such as quarrying, including new regional enforcement structures across planning authorities ('regional enforcement authorities') I have no intention to amend planning requirements further with respect to quarrying development. Regional enforcement authorities will have responsibility for, among other things, the investigation and bringing of enforcement actions, and where appropriate initiating prosecution proceedings

A Steering Group comprising representatives from my Department and planning authorities (via the County and City Managers Association) has been established to provide a coordinated national response, with appropriate State backing and resources, to the enforcement of both quarries and peat extraction. It is intended that the Steering Group will operate for an initial period of three years, with provision for extension as required based on progress, outcomes and the evolution of planning enforcement structures.

It should be noted that at present, planning authorities have full enforcement powers under the current provisions of the Act of 2000, for all enforcement matters including quarrying, and are not reliant on the establishment of regional enforcement authorities under the Act of 2024 in order to undertake enforcement action.

Wildlife Protection

Ceisteanna (651)

Liam Quaide

Ceist:

651. Deputy Liam Quaide asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage the number of reports received by the NPWS concerning alleged unlawful habitat destruction in each of the years 2021 to 2026 to date; the number of incidents inspected or investigated; the number that proceeded to enforcement action or prosecution; and a breakdown of data by region. [37922/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra
The following deferred reply was received under Standing Orders.
The National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) of my Department treats all allegations of unlawful habitat destruction as a serious matter, particularly where such activities may constitute breaches of the Wildlife Acts, the European Communities (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011, or other legislation designed to protect habitats, species and biodiversity.
Combatting wildlife crime and environmental damage forms a core part of the work of the NPWS in delivering on its mission to protect nature. The NPWS adopts a multi-faceted approach that combines enforcement activity with awareness raising, engagement and education initiatives, alongside cooperation with other State agencies where appropriate.
The NPWS receives reports from a range of sources concerning alleged habitat destruction, including reports from members of the public, environmental organisations, public authorities and NPWS staff observations in the course of their duties. Such reports may relate to activities including hedgerow removal, drainage works, land clearance, burning, peat extraction, damage to protected habitats, or other activities potentially impacting biodiversity.
All reported incidents of alleged wildlife crime are investigated, however, it should be noted, that for some incidents, no further action is required, where it is deemed that no offence has taken place under either the Wildlife Act, 1976, as amended or EC (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations 2011, as amended. Furthermore, Ministerial Directions may also be issued under the EC (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations to restore habitats in designated Natura 2000 sites i.e. Special Areas of Conservation or Special Protection Areas. Incidents, for example, of burning of vegetation, are also referred to other Departments, who have functions in investigating the destruction of habitats, for example, to the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine. Members of the public can also report such incidents to these Departments. For prosecutions, fines may be imposed on conviction of a particular offence under the Wildlife Act or EC (Birds and Natural Habitats) Regulations or the Probation Act may be applied, at the discretion of the judge, where a donation is then made to a charity. In such cases, the charity is often related to wildlife rehabilitation.
The available information sought for the period is set out in the tables below. Please note the available data for prosecutions has been listed by County as prosecution cases are assigned to a county’s Chief State Solicitor by the Chief State Solicitors Office. NPWS Regions cover many counties, can be split between counties and have been restructured in the last five years under the NPWS Strategic Action Plan following the review of NPWS.
* Total number of incidents reported, inspected and investigated

2021

2022

NPWS Region

Reports*

NPWS Region

Reports*

South Eastern

47

South Eastern

47

Mid South

36

North Eastern

145

Mid West

66

Mid West

66

North Eastern

145

Western

2

South West

7

South West

7

Mid South

36

2023

2024

NPWS Region

Reports*

NPWS Region

Reports*

South Eastern

71

South Eastern

56

North Eastern

197

North Eastern

218

Mid West

57

Mid West

127

Western

8

Western

12

South West

23

South West

25

Mid South

11

Mid South

15

2025

2026 to date

NPWS Region

Reports*

NPWS Region

Reports*

South Eastern

48

South Eastern

51

North Eastern

125

North Eastern

1

Mid West

158

Mid West

63

North Midlands

36

South West

12

Western

73

Mid South

10

South West

83

Mid South

58

Total number of prosecutions for habitat destruction

County

Year

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

2026

Total

Carlow

1

0

1

0

2

0

4

Cavan

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Clare

1

1

1

1

1

0

5

Cork

6

0

3

0

1

0

10

Donegal

0

0

1

0

1

0

2

Dublin

0

1

2

0

1

0

4

Galway

6

3

11

1

6

2

29

Kerry

1

2

0

1

1

0

5

Kildare

2

3

6

1

0

1

13

Kilkenny

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

Laois

2

4

1

0

5

4

16

Leitrim

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Limerick

0

2

2

2

1

0

7

Longford

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

Louth

0

2

0

1

0

0

3

Mayo

3

1

2

3

4

0

13

Meath

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

Monaghan

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Offaly

3

2

2

1

0

0

8

Roscommon

1

0

0

2

1

0

4

Sligo

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

Tipperary

3

0

2

1

0

6

Waterford

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

Westmeath

2

2

3

1

1

0

9

Wexford

0

0

1

3

1

0

5

Wicklow

1

1

0

0

1

0

3

Minister of State for Housing, Local Government and Heritage (Christopher O'Sullivan)

National Parks and Wildlife Service

Ceisteanna (652, 653)

Liam Quaide

Ceist:

652. Deputy Liam Quaide asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage for details of any geographical areas that are currently without locally funded NPWS posts, as well as funded but not filled NPWS posts, for conservation ranger, district conservation officer and regional manager roles or equivalent; the length of time each area has been without such a post; if there are temporary cover arrangements in place in each case; the plans and timelines for sanctioning or recruiting to these posts; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37923/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Liam Quaide

Ceist:

653. Deputy Liam Quaide asked the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage for details of the most recent date on which any NPWS posts in geographical areas currently without locally funded posts, or sanctioned but unfilled posts were advertised, broken down by region and role, for conservation ranger, district conservation officer and regional manager roles or equivalent; whether each competition remains active, has closed, or failed to fill the post; the reason any post has not yet been filled; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37924/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 652 and 653 together.

Conservation Rangers, District Conservation Officers and Regional Managers are deployed through a regional structure, and assignments are determined in light of Departmental business needs and priorities. Given the enforcement roles discharged by certain staff in the NPWS, for reasons of operational security, my Department does not provide details of staffing in the manner requested.

There are 110 Conservation Rangers stationed around the country at present and it is my intention to further increase this number up to 121. I am pleased to say that my Department is liaising with the publicjobs to run another Conservation Ranger recruitment campaign. In addition, my Department is currently running internal promotion competitions for District Conservation Officers and Regional Managers. Any appointments across the country made from these competitions, will take account of both the business needs and financial resources to meet pay costs.

Staffing levels across my Department are kept under regular review in line with emerging business needs and Government policy on public sector pay and staffing as advised by the Department of Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation.

Question No. 653 answered with Question No. 652.

School Meals Programme

Ceisteanna (654)

John McGuinness

Ceist:

654. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of free school meal providers nationwide; the breakdown of schools and their providers; the source of the meat and chicken for these meals; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [37119/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The objective of the School Meals Programme is to provide regular, nutritious food to children to support them in taking full advantage of the education provided to them. The programme is an important component of policies to encourage school attendance and extra educational achievement.

In Budget 2025, it was announced that the Hot School Meals Scheme would be extended to all remaining primary schools in 2025, meaning that approximately 3,700 schools and organisations and 682,000 children are now eligible for the School Meals Programme.

My Department provides the funding for food to schools. My department does not select or approve suppliers. All schools as independent contracting authorities, are responsible for choosing their school meals supplier on the open market, in a fair and transparent manner in accordance with public procurement rules. The Department of Education and Youth Schools Procurement Unit provides guidance to schools for all procurements including the School Meals Programme. These rules clearly define the successful tenders responsibilities and obligations. The primary relationship is between school and supplier. 

My department does not collect information on where the supplier source their ingredients. Under the National Green Procurement Strategy and Action Plan 2024-2027 it states "a minimum of 10% by value (€) of food sought by public sector bodies under new contract arrangements (including via contractors such as canteen service providers), is to be certified organic in each of the following categories of Cereals, fresh Beef, Lamb, Pork, Poultry, Fish, Vegetables and Dairy products, where possible.’

Under the Department of Education and Youth template procurement documentation it stipulates that menus must include a range of locally sourced produce, along with a greater use of sustainable food, for example, in-season produce, high animal welfare standards on meat, free-range eggs, marine conservation certified fish.

There is no stipulation that food should originate from Ireland only. It should be noted that under EU laws, and as reflected in public procurement rules, it cannot be specified that food must originate from a particular country. That would be in breach of EU single market rules.

In relation to suppliers there are some 300 suppliers in the School Meals Programme with the majority of these supplying one to three local schools. There are eleven meals on wheels organisations supplying forty schools and there are nine large school meal providers (defined as supplying 40 schools or more).

Social Welfare Code

Ceisteanna (655)

John McGuinness

Ceist:

655. Deputy John McGuinness asked the Minister for Social Protection if he will consider for the upcoming Budget 2027 amending the living alone allowance scheme to include single (never married) retired civil and public servants employed prior to 1995, given that the current scheme discriminates against such employees; his views on whether these people are being discriminated against; if he will further consider the fact that those in this cohort of State employees who are widowed qualify for the scheme, thereby adding to the discriminatory nature of the scheme; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36831/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Questions related to occupational pensions for former civil and public servants are a matter for my colleague, the Minister for Public Expenditure, Infrastructure, Public Service Reform and Digitalisation.

Primary weekly social welfare payments are intended to enable recipients to meet their basic day-to-day income needs. In addition to these primary payments, my Department also provides a range of other payments on a weekly, monthly, or less frequent basis.  These payments are considered secondary in nature with each of them having their own individual qualifying criteria.

The Living Alone Increase (LAI) is one of those secondary payments. It is not a scheme or a stand-alone payment, but it is a supplement to a primary social protection payment of €22 per week made to people aged 66 years or over, who are in receipt of certain social welfare payments and who are living alone.

For those aged 66 or over, payments eligible for the LAI include State Pension (Contributory), State Pension (Non-contributory), Bereaved Partner’s (Contributory) Pension, Bereaved Partner's Pension under the Occupational Injuries Benefit Scheme, Incapacity Supplement under the Occupational Injuries Benefit Scheme and Deserted Wife's Benefit. LAI is also paid to people aged under 66 who live alone and are in receipt of Disability Allowance, Invalidity Pension, Incapacity Supplement or Blind Pension.

Prior to 6 April 1995, civil and public servants did not have access to the full range of social insurance benefits as their terms of employment protected them against the main contingencies of illness and old age, and the risk of unemployment was not considered a factor due to the nature of their employment.

Consequently, such contributors pay less in social insurance contributions in return for fewer social insurance benefits. For example, class B contributors currently pay a contribution at the rate of 1.1% on their weekly earnings up to €1,443 and 4.2% on weekly earnings over that amount and their employers pay a contribution of 2.21% on all employee earnings. Class B contributors are currently entitled to Bereaved Partner’s (Contributory) Pension, Guardian's Payment (Contributory), (limited) Occupational Injuries Benefits, Parent's Benefit and Carer's Benefit. Class B contributions do not provide entitlement to the State Pension (Contributory), except in certain circumstances where, in conjunction with class A contributions, they can be used when calculating entitlement to a mixed-insurance pro-rata pension.

The fact that this cohort of State employees who are widowed can qualify for a LAI reflects that class B, C and D contributions provide an entitlement to a Bereaved Partner's (Contributory) Pension, where the conditions of the scheme are met. Therefore, such persons can receive the LAI in addition to this primary payment.

Civil and public servants recruited from 6 April 1995, and those employed in the private sector, pay a class A social insurance contribution of 4.2% on their weekly earnings. Their employers pay a contribution of 9.0% where employees’ weekly earnings are €552 or less and 11.25% where their employees’ weekly earnings exceed €552. Class A contributors have access to the full range of social insurance benefits, including State Pension (Contributory). However, the value of the State Pension (Contributory) is integrated with their public service pension (in the case of those recruited after 6 April 1995 and before 1 January 2013), unlike those pre-April 1995 civil and public servants who receive their full pension entitlement under their public service pension.

The State Pension (Non-contributory) is available to those who satisfy the means-test and who are ordinarily resident in the state, regardless of their social insurance contribution history. The State Pension (Non-contributory) is a qualifying payment for the LAI, regardless of the rate of payment.

There are no circumstances where the LAI can be paid to people who are not in receipt of a primary qualifying payment from my Department or who do not meet the living alone eligibility criteria. Any change to the qualifying criteria for this payment would have to be considered in an overall policy and budgetary context.

Departmental Staff

Ceisteanna (656)

Paul Donnelly

Ceist:

656. Deputy Paul Donnelly asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of WTE staff, by grade and gender, currently answering telephone queries and processing free travel pass applications as of 11 May 2026, in tabular form. [36838/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Free Travel Scheme allows people who are aged 66 years or over, and who are legally and permanently residing in the State, to travel free of charge on most CIE public transport services, LUAS, Local Link, as well as on the public transport services of a large number of private operators in various parts of the country. Certain people under age 66 may also be entitled to free travel if they are in receipt of a qualifying primary payment from my Department.

The Free Travel and Household Benefits Customer Contact Centre is staffed by 4 Whole Time Equivalent (WTE) Clerical Officers and 1 WTE Executive Officer on a daily basis. Additional capacity is added when required.

There is a WTE of 9.5 officials involved in the management and processing Free Travel applications.

Grade

Male WTE

Female WTE

Total

AP

1

1

HEO

1

1

EO

1

1

CO

1

5.5

6.5

I hope this clarifies the matter for the Deputy.

Departmental Data

Ceisteanna (657)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

657. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection the total number of social welfare claims referred for fraud investigation in each year from 2021 to 2026, in tabular form, including a breakdown by category of suspected fraud where recorded; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36868/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Overpayments of social welfare entitlements can occur where a person provides false or misleading information in their application or through error on the part of either the claimant or the Department. Persons who have been overpaid social welfare have a liability to refund the overpayment as they have been in receipt of a payment to which they were not entitled.

The table below sets out the number of overpayments raised and the associated value of those cases where an element of fraudulent activity was suspected from 2021 to 2025. Figures for 2026 are not available. These cases arise where a deciding officer is satisfied that there is sufficient evidence that a person deliberately provided false or misleading information or wilfully concealed relevant information in relation to their entitlement. The Deputy will appreciate that there is a high evidential standard to be met in such cases.

Year

No. of Suspected Fraud Cases

Value of Overpayments

2021

6,290

€19,014,828

2022

5,597

€19,635,546

2023

5,097

€17,963,080

2024

6,007

€24,344,345

2025

5,909

€29,032,974

Social Welfare Fraud

Ceisteanna (658, 659, 660, 661, 662, 663, 664, 665)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

658. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether any guidance, staff training programme, operational protocol or technical system has been introduced since 2022 to assist departmental staff in identifying forged, AI-generated or digitally manipulated documentation submitted in support of social welfare claims; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36869/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

659. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether his Department has conducted any internal risk assessment, review or analysis regarding the use of artificial intelligence tools in the creation of forged identity, residency, employment, income or supporting documentation submitted in support of social welfare claims; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36870/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

660. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether his Department uses any external forensic document analysis service, AI-detection software, biometric verification tool or digital authentication system when assessing suspected fraudulent social welfare claims; the annual cost of such systems or services since 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36871/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

661. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection the number of social welfare claims refused, suspended or terminated in each year from 2021 to 2026 due to concerns regarding forged, falsified or fraudulent documentation, where such information is available; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36872/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

662. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether his Department exchanges data or intelligence with An Garda Síochána, the Revenue Commissioners, financial institutions or other State bodies for the purpose of detecting forged or fraudulent documentation submitted in support of social welfare claims; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36873/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

663. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether any increase has been identified in the submission of digitally altered or suspected AI-generated documentation in support of social welfare claims in the past three years; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36874/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

664. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether his Department maintains statistics on the number of suspected forged-document cases referred onward to An Garda Síochána for criminal investigation in each year since 2021; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36875/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

665. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Social Protection whether any dedicated unit, team or officer within his Department has responsibility for oversight, monitoring or investigation of forged or AI-generated documentation submitted in support of social welfare claims; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36876/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 658 to 665, inclusive, together.

My Department continues to operate in a dynamic and evolving environment, requiring it to respond proactively to emerging challenges. This includes continuously strengthening and updating processes to ensure vigilance and an effective response to new and evolving forms of fraud and non-compliance.

The Department has a range of verification processes in place to validate and verify the information provided by a customer. The Department also engages in data matching with external bodies and agencies to identify inconsistencies in information provided.  Information is only exchanged in line with the appropriate legislative provisions. In addition, our data analytics team carry out risk assessments of individual records and develops analytic solutions to increase the detection rate of non-compliant claims. The Department does not use any external forensic document analysis service and does not have statistics in relation to forged document cases as requested by the Deputy.

The Department’s Special Investigation Unit (SIU) is staffed by experienced, trained and dedicated teams of investigating officers, including officers seconded from An Garda Síochána. SIU officers have wide-ranging powers of investigation and continue to work in collaboration with other public bodies and law enforcement agencies in Ireland, Northern Ireland and overseas. The Unit concentrates on sectors where social welfare fraud is most prevalent and works in co-operation with other anti-fraud authorities, domestically and internationally, and with An Garda Síochána to investigate, and where appropriate, prosecute offences detected under the provisions of the Social Welfare Consolidation Act or the Criminal Justice Acts.

From the analysis of data from targeted control reviews and random based control surveys, there is no evidence of increased levels of forged documents. Many of our benefits are based on PRSI contributions which have already been paid by the individual. On means tested payments, the three primary causes of overpayments are consistently: working while claiming, payments after death where the customer’s death has not been notified in a timely manner, and changes in means.

Question No. 659 answered with Question No. 658.
Question No. 660 answered with Question No. 658.
Question No. 661 answered with Question No. 658.
Roinn