Léim ar aghaidh chuig an bpríomhábhar
Gnáthamharc

Wednesday, 15 Jul 2026

Written Answers Nos. 300-319

International Protection

Ceisteanna (302)

Matt Carthy

Ceist:

302. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he will undertake a review of section 26 of the International Protection Act 2015 to determine whether amendments are required to ensure that An Garda Síochána may publish the name, photograph and other identifying details of an international protection applicant where there is a risk to public safety, or where that person has been charged with an indictable offence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53848/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Nothing in the International Protection legislation prevents An Garda Síochána communicating information in the course of an investigation, including personal details of a person where necessary, so long as they have due regard to the requirement not to publish information likely to lead members of the public to identify that person as an international protection applicant without the consent of that person.

The confidentiality principle is a principle of asylum law which is reflected both in the Asylum Procedures Regulation and in our domestic law, the International Protection Act 2015, which applies to asylum applications made before 12th June 2026, and the International Protection Act 2026, which applies to applications made after that date.

An asylum-seeker’s claim inherently supposes a fear of persecution by the authorities of their home country and therefore may also mean that their family or friends still living in the country from which they have sought protection, can be jeopardised if their personal information is not confidential.

Therefore my officials and I are legally obliged to ensure that the identity of any person who applied  for international protection is kept confidential. For applicants whose applications were made prior to 12th June 2026, section 26(1) of the 2015 Act sets out that:

“the Minister and the Tribunal and their respective officers shall take all practicable steps to ensure that the identity of applicants is kept confidential”.

As regards applications made after 12th June 2026, Article 7 of the Asylum Procedures Regulation states that:

“1. The authorities applying this Regulation shall be bound by the principle of confidentiality in relation to any personal information they acquire in the performance of their duties, including any exchange of information in accordance with Union or national law which is relevant for the application of this Regulation between authorities of the Member States.

2. Throughout the procedure for international protection and after a final decision on the application has been taken, the authorities shall not:

(a) disclose information regarding the individual application for international protection or the fact that an application has been made, to the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm;

(b) obtain any information from the alleged actors of persecution or serious harm in a manner that would result in such actors being informed of the fact that an application has been made by the applicant in question.”

In line with this, section 278(1) of the International Protection Act 2026 (in similar terms to section 26 of the 2015 Act)  provides that:

“A person shall not publish or broadcast, or cause to be published or broadcast, information likely to lead members of the public to identify that a person is an applicant without the consent of that person”.

A person who contravenes this section themselves commits an offence.

The confidentiality requirements contained in both Acts apply to all international applicants including those charged or convicted of criminal offences. This does not mean that cases cannot be covered by the media, but rather that it must be covered in a manner that does not lead to the person being identified as an applicant for international protection. An applicant can themselves consent to being so identified.

When processing international protection applications, criminal convictions are always considered. As part of this, character and conduct checks are carried out before applicants can be granted any permission to remain in the State.

International Protection

Ceisteanna (303)

Matt Carthy

Ceist:

303. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the step-by-step process that applies to a person who arrives in the State without a passport or other travel document and subsequently seeks international protection, including the procedures for screening, identification, biometric data collection, registration of the application, accommodation arrangements, examination of the claim, appeals process, and any documentation issued to the applicant at each stage, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53849/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

It has not been possible to collate the information requested by the Deputy in the time available. I will write to the Deputy directly once the information is to hand.

International Protection

Ceisteanna (304)

Richard Boyd Barrett

Ceist:

304. Deputy Richard Boyd Barrett asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the process by which unaccompanied minors seeking international protection are assessed on arrival at a port of entry; the State agencies involved in this process; the Department that is ultimately responsible; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53864/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Border Management Unit (BMU) of my Department has responsibility for frontline immigration duties at Dublin Airport only. Frontline immigration duties at other airports and ports of entry are the responsibility of An Garda Síochána.

The International Protection Act 2026 introduced a structured, statutory framework for the appointment and role of a child representative for unaccompanied minors. In the case of an unaccompanied minor at a port of entry requesting international protection, a child representative will be contacted to attend the port of entry and act on behalf of the unaccompanied minor during the international protection application process in line with their best interests. Once initial details for the unaccompanied minor are obtained at the port of entry, the representative will attend Citywest Screening Centre with them to further their application.

Section 55 of the International Protection Act 2026 sets out the legislative basis for carrying out an age assessment in line with the best interests of the child. Both this Act, and the EU Pact on Migration and Asylum, set out a series of safeguards in relation to dealing with presumed minors, including the procedure for age assessment.

Each applicant is required to provide any identity documents in their possession. Where doubts arise to the claimed age of the applicant, an age assessment is scheduled. In conducting an age assessment, the Determining Authority (the International Protection Office) may consider statements made by the applicant to an officer of the Minister, a member of An Garda Siochana, their appointed representative, an immigration officer, a member of staff of the Child and Family Agency (Tusla) and any documentary evidence available.

The applicant is provided with the opportunity to receive legal counselling and/or be appointed a legal representative, and a dedicated child representative supports them throughout all procedures. A professionally trained social care worker carries out a psychosocial assessment to support the age assessment decision.

If the applicant is deemed to be a minor, they are referred by the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to Tusla. Tusla will then undertake their own internal eligibility for services process. If, following completion of this process, Tusla disagrees with the Department’s decision, and believes the applicant to be an adult, they can refer the applicant back to the Department for a subsequent age assessment under Section 60 of the 2026 Act.

Section 57 of the 2026 Act provides for a medical examination to determine age once the applicant and/or their representative consent, and a designated health care professional will carry out the least invasive procedure possible that protects the applicant’s dignity.

The Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration has responsibility in this area and will establish a panel of qualified health care professionals to support this work where necessary.

Question No. 305 answered with Question No. 295.

EU Meetings

Ceisteanna (306)

Brendan Smith

Ceist:

306. Deputy Brendan Smith asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the range of topics covered and the outcome of his discussions in Cork with Members of the European Commission; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53916/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Ireland’s EU Presidency term began on July 1. It is the culmination of a long process of planning and preparation that has been a major focus across Government.

The traditional Presidency visit by the College of Commissioners took place in Cork on 2-3 July 2026 and represented the first collective engagement between the Government of Ireland and the European Commission during the Ireland’s Presidency term. The visit provided an important opportunity to strengthen political relationships, establish a shared understanding of Ireland’s Presidency priorities and discuss how we will work with the Commission though our term to ensure we can deliver effectively on our policy objectives to the benefit of citizens in Ireland and across Europe.

During the programme, structured cluster discussions involving Ministers and Commissioners focused on industrial competitiveness and the single market; agriculture, climate, energy and economic transition; security, external relations, defence, preparedness, trade and economic security; and values, skills, social cohesion and housing.

As Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, I engaged in a comprehensive discussion on security, external relations, defence, preparedness, trade and economic security alongside Commission Vice-President and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Kaja Kallas, with other Ministers and Commissioners with relevant portfolios also participating.

Discussions reflected the increasingly interconnected nature of Europe’s external and internal security agenda, with particular emphasis on resilience, strategic partnerships and crisis response. A number of significant legislative and policy files were identified for progression during the Irish Presidency, including those relating to migration, enlargement, military mobility and trade.

Overall, there was a high degree of alignment between the Government and the European Commission on the priorities and objectives for the work of the EU during the Irish Presidency term, together with a shared commitment to maintaining momentum across the Union’s legislative and policy agenda.

Court Procedures

Ceisteanna (307)

Ruth Coppinger

Ceist:

307. Deputy Ruth Coppinger asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration if he will publish the advice that he has received in relation to the constitutionality of the ban of a use of counselling notes in a criminal trial as evidence; if the rights of complainants were considered in a balance with the rights to a fair trial; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53925/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The issue of the disclosure of counselling records is a complex and highly sensitive balancing of individuals' rights.

On the one hand, there is the victim’s right to personal privacy and on the other, the accused person’s right to a fair trial. The accused’s right to a fair trial entails a right to disclosure of any material that may strengthen the defendant's case or weaken that of the prosecution. It also places the onus on the prosecution to disclose all relevant information. If the accused’s right to a fair trial is breached, then the prosecution may be compromised or the conviction quashed.

The law in this area was substantially reformed in 2017 by the insertion of section 19A of the Criminal Evidence Act 1992: revisedacts.lawreform.ie/eli/1992/act/12/section/19A/revised/en/html

This was enacted to strike a balance between conflicting rights, by creating a new process whereby a victim could consent or object to the disclosure of their counselling notes. In instances where the victim objects to disclosure, a disclosure hearing is held, at which s/he is legally represented by a solicitor or barrister engaged by the Legal Aid Board.

At the hearing, the trial judge decides whether the records should be released. In doing so, the judge must take into account the right of the victim to privacy and the risk of re-traumatisation, while ensuring the constitutional right of an accused person to a fair trial, including access to any material of evidentiary value, is upheld.

Despite the intention of the legislation to provide for a procedure that balances both rights, it appears that in practice this provision did not operate as intended and records have been routinely disclosed.

My Department has engaged in extensive stakeholder consultation on this issue, including with the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, An Garda Síochána, the HSE, Tusla and civil society organisations including Dublin Rape Crisis Centre and Rape Crisis Ireland. There was consensus from stakeholders that large volumes of often irrelevant personal material have routinely been sought in sexual offence trials, to the significant detriment of a victim’s right to privacy.

Legal advice has been clear that a blanket ban on counselling records would not be compatible with the Constitution. Accordingly, the policy rationale underpinning the proposed amendments is to restrict the disclosure of counselling records and other categories of records containing sensitive personal information to the maximum extent possible within constitutional parameters, cognisant in particular of fair trial rights under Article 38.

Regarding the publication of the legal advice on the constitutionality of the ban on counselling notes, any legal advice provided by the Attorney General’s Office is subject to legal privilege and therefore cannot be disclosed.

The Criminal Law, Civil Law and Defence (Miscellaneous Provisions) Bill 2026 completed all Seanad stages on 2 July.

Legislative Measures

Ceisteanna (308)

Maurice Quinlivan

Ceist:

308. Deputy Maurice Quinlivan asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration for an update on the progression of the Inspection of Places of Detention Bill; if he will consider extending remit of the Bill to health and social care settings; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [53928/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

Ireland ratified the UN Convention against Torture in 2002 and signed the Optional Protocol to the convention (OPCAT) in 2007.

The OPCAT obliges signatory states to establish a system of inspections of all places where persons can be detained, to be carried out by inspection bodies to be known as National Preventive Mechanisms.

My Department is currently working with the Office of Parliamentary Counsel to draft the legislation needed to enable ratification – the Inspection of Places of Detention Bill. This is a commitment in the 2025 Programme for Government and the intention is to publish the Bill in the coming months. This work is well advanced.

The legislation will provide for the designation of a single National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) to visit and inspect all places of detention in the Justice Sector and for Government Ministers in other sectors to appoint appropriate NPMs for places of detention that fall  within their remit, which may include health and social care settings.

The existing post of Inspector of Prisons will be replaced by a new post of Chief Inspector of Places of Detention to take on the role of NPM for the Justice sector, to include prisons, Garda stations, the courts and vehicles used by the Irish Prison Service and Gardaí for the purpose of transporting people in their custody.

This means that the new Chief Inspector will have a mandate to monitor a person’s entire journey through detention, from the point of being placed in a Garda vehicle, through to their time in a cell (Garda and court), on remand and, if sentenced, into a term of imprisonment.

The OPCAT will be ratified after the legislation is passed by the Oireachtas.

Citizenship Applications

Ceisteanna (309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316)

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

309. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of occasions on which Irish citizenship has been revoked under the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956 since the enactment of the new revocation procedures; and the breakdown of the grounds relied upon in each case. [53996/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

310. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of cases currently under consideration for the revocation of Irish citizenship from naturalised citizens under the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956. [53997/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

311. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether his Department has commenced, or intends to commence, citizenship revocation proceedings in respect of a person (details supplied); and the current status of any such proceedings. [53998/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

312. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether his Department has considered the revocation of Irish citizenship in respect of naturalised Irish citizen convicted of terrorism-related offences outside the State; and if he will outline the policy applied in such cases. [53999/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

313. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether the revocation provisions are intended to apply equally to naturalised citizens convicted of offences relating to terrorism, organised crime, or offences against the security of the State, whether committed within or outside of Ireland. [54000/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

314. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether he has considered, or intends to consider, exercising his statutory powers to revoke the Irish citizenship of a person (details supplied) insofar as that person is a naturalised Irish citizen and the statutory criteria are satisfied; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54001/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

315. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether his Department has conducted a review of all naturalised Irish citizens convicted of terrorism offences, or offences involving support for terrorist organisations, with a view to assessing whether citizenship revocation proceedings are appropriate; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54002/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Ken O'Flynn

Ceist:

316. Deputy Ken O'Flynn asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration whether he will publish updated guidance on the exercise of the statutory power to revoke Irish citizenship, including the factors taken into account in determining whether revocation is in the public interest; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54003/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 309 to 316, inclusive, together.

I can advise the Deputy that it would not be appropriate for me to comment on the specific circumstances of the cases referred to.

The grounds for the revocation of citizenship are as set out in section 19 of the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956 (as amended).

Changes to this process were made by the Court, Civil Law, Criminal Law and Superannuation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2024; these changes were required to address issues identified in a Supreme Court judgment that had found the then revocation process to be unconstitutional. Amendments to the process of revocation of citizenship came into effect from 7 April 2025 and the revised provisions can be found at: revisedacts.lawreform.ie/eli/1956/act/26/section/19/revised/en/html

Under the new procedure, where the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration decides to revoke citizenship, they may do so under the five grounds set out in the 1956 Act. A notification of this intention is issued to the individual, who will be provided with the opportunity to make representations, and has 28 days to so, before a decision is made to revoke their certificate of naturalisation.

Following receipt of those representations, or on expiry of the 28 days, if it is decided to proceed to revoke the certificate of naturalisation, then the individual has 14 days in which to request a Committee of Inquiry. Upon receipt of this request, the Minister will appoint a Committee of Inquiry, which will be composed of a chairperson who will be a retired Judge of the Circuit Court, the High Court, the Court of Appeal, or the Supreme Court, and two ordinary members with appropriate experience and qualifications. The Committee of Inquiry will be independent in its function of inquiry into the Minister's decision and can either affirm the decision or set it aside.

In the last 10 years, 8 people have had their citizenship revoked, this includes two revocations since 7 April 2025.

My Department actively reviews cases relating to terrorism, fraud and organised crime with a view to assessing whether citizenship revocation proceedings are appropriate.

Question No. 310 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 311 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 312 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 313 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 314 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 315 answered with Question No. 309.
Question No. 316 answered with Question No. 309.

Domestic Violence

Ceisteanna (317)

Thomas Gould

Ceist:

317. Deputy Thomas Gould asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of domestic abuse refuge beds in Cork in each of the past five years, in tabular form. [54087/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

This Government has taken unprecedented actions to confront the scourge of domestic, sexual, and gender-based violence (DSGBV). This includes increasing funding to almost €80 million under Budget 2026, to support Cuan and services working to tackle DSGBV and the implementation of the Zero Tolerance Strategy.

Cuan is collaborating with various stakeholders, including domestic violence services, Approved Housing Bodies, the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, the Housing Agency and Local Authorities to facilitate local action and support service development and delivery of safe accommodation and ancillary services.

Cuan have advised that the were 11 Domestic Violence Accommodation units in Cork in 2024 and 2025, including Safe Homes and similar.

In 2026, Domestic Violence Accommodation includes:

• Cuanlee Refuge has 11 units of Refuge Accommodation, 5 of which are in Bessborough

• West Cork Beacon has 1 Safe Home

• YANA (You Are Not Alone) has 2 Safe Homes

There are further domestic violence accommodation plans in development for the Cork area:

• Cuanlee Women’s Refuge in partnership with Good Shepherd Cork (GSC) are developing a 16-unit refuge. This will comprise five new units and 11 replacement units.

• West Cork Beacon (West Cork Women Against Violence Project) are to develop a five-unit refuge.

• YANA (You Are Not Alone) in partnership with GSC have plans to develop a 10-unit Refuge.

Data is not available prior to the establishment of Cuan in 2024, as policy and funding functions were distributed across a range of bodies including my Department and Tusla.

An Garda Síochána

Ceisteanna (318)

Thomas Gould

Ceist:

318. Deputy Thomas Gould asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration the number of Gardaí currently working in each of the Garda stations in Cork, by rank, in tabular form. [54176/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

The Garda Commissioner is responsible for the management and administration of An Garda Síochána under section 33 of the Policing, Security and Community Safety Act 2024, which includes the distribution and stationing of Garda personnel throughout the State.

An Garda Síochána publishes information in relation to the allocation of Garda personnel nationally. This includes a breakdown of the number of Gardaí by rank assigned to stations in Cork as at 31 May 2026, the latest date for when figures are available.

The information can be found at the following link: www.garda.ie/en/information-centre/garda-statistics/human%20resources/

The Deputy should select the statistics for 2026, May 2026 and then select the file titled ‘Garda Members by Division District Station" to access a breakdown of Garda members assigned to stations in the Cork County and Cork City Divisions.

Legal Aid

Ceisteanna (319, 320)

Matt Carthy

Ceist:

319. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration to provide a list of the names of solicitors that are included on the Criminal Legal Aid panel as of 10 July 2026; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54190/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Matt Carthy

Ceist:

320. Deputy Matt Carthy asked the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration for a list of the names of all solicitors that are included on the Criminal Legal Aid panel as of 10 July 2026, by county, in tabular form; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [54191/26]

Amharc ar fhreagra

Freagraí scríofa

I propose to take Questions Nos. 319 and 320 together.

Solicitors may apply to be placed on the Criminal Legal Aid panel for any county using a single application form, which is processed by a centralised courts office in Castlebar, Co. Mayo. This system, introduced in 2021, replaced the previous requirement to apply separately to individual local court offices.

My Department significantly simplified the procedures for Criminal Legal Aid panel membership both for solicitors and counsel last year by waiving the requirement to apply yearly to be retained on panels, with the commencement on 26 November 2025 of S.I. 539 of 2025.

It is common practice for solicitors to apply to be included on more than one county panel, and some solicitors apply to be included on all panels. As a result, a solicitor may appear on multiple county panels. I am advised that the Courts Service cannot currently generate a single consolidated report from its tracking systems showing the names of all solicitors on the Criminal Legal Aid panels on a specific date. The Courts Service is examining how this information can be generated in that format in future.

I can inform the Deputy that the total number of solicitors on the Criminal Legal Aid panel as of close of business on 9 July 2026 was 776, that the total number of resignations received by close of business on 9 July 2026 was 76, and that the number of new applications received to be added to the panel  by close of business on 9 July was 4.

Roinn