In relation to the supervised access provider referred to by the Deputy, Tusla has advised that it has not used its services since 2024 and has blocked its use as a provider to Tusla.
In a small number of cases, Tusla uses external providers, such as supervision and access centres, often at the direction of the courts. These services are typically used when a child is in the care of Tusla.
With regard to the commissioning of these services, a process exists, as it does for all external third-party providers, to register with Tusla. This involves a governance process, including confirmation of qualifications, Garda vetting, mandatory training and membership of relevant professional bodies, among other checks.
Any reports prepared by such providers form only part of the overall evidence presented to the courts. Where commissioned by Tusla, reports are considered in the context of individual case management and are ultimately subject to scrutiny by the courts, where they may be challenged by contradictory evidence, for example from social workers, guardians ad litem, psychologists, foster carers and parents.
It is important to acknowledge the independence of the courts in family law proceedings. Tusla is only one of a number of parties that may contract or arrange supervised access services on the basis of court orders.
In many family law cases, Tusla may have no involvement at all, the case may be entirely between the parents.
The authorisation of the use of Garda logos by private or other providers would be a matter for An Garda Síochána.
