As the Deputy will be aware, the Programme for Government commits to ‘continue the programme of reform of Senior Cycle to ensure that students benefit from up-to-date curricula, more diverse skills development and assessments, and reduced stress levels.’
As of September 2025, the revised Leaving Certificate science specifications and their associated Additional Assessment Components (AACs) are the established curriculum being followed by students. The live briefs for relevant Tranche 1 subjects were published by the SEC in January 2026. Students, teachers, and their schools are now actively working on their AACs in terms of planning and preparing for the various stages or phases involved in their completion.
AACs are designed to assess students’ skills and key competencies in a way that a terminal written examination cannot. Students will learn through exploring, analysing and investigating – not all of which involves laboratory work.
Through a combination of the Science Implementation Support Grant paid to schools in December 2024; the expanded science subject grant for the 2025/26 school year paid in December 2025; and the Climate Action Summer Works commitment announced in November 2025, approximately €45m in additional funding has been committed to the science subjects since the redeveloped science specifications were published. More generally, approximately 300 new or modernised science labs have been delivered since 2020.
In January, €35m in ICT grants funding issued to Primary and Post-Primary schools for the 2025/2026 school year. The €35 million in ICT grant funding represents the fourth tranche of ICT funding under the Digital Strategy and builds on the €135 million that has issued to date under the current strategy in addition to the €210 million issued under the previous strategy. Funding issues as a lump sum per school, plus a per capita amount, with an enhanced per capita rate for students enrolled in DEIS and Special schools and to pupils in mainstream special class primary settings. Using this model of funding, all schools are treated equally, fairly and transparently.
The introduction the revised science specifications is being supported by key publications and through a comprehensive programme of Teacher Professional Learning (TPL) provided by Oide.
The specifications published in August 2024 include a section on descriptors of quality for the AACs. In November 2024, the NCCA published Guidelines to support the Science in Practice Investigations which include setting out the steps involved over time and provide clarity on the role of the teacher.
SEC has provided a substantial body of material to support implementation, including sample written examination papers, sample and live AAC briefs, and supporting FAQ material for schools and teachers.
The published sample examination papers support familiarisation with the structure, format and level of demand of the papers and indicate the marks available for each question. In addition, the AAC briefs, both sample and live, set out how marks are allocated across the areas of content and provide clear guidance on how the AAC should be completed and presented.
The AAC briefs have been designed to facilitate a wide range of student approaches and to encourage student agency in how a brief is approached. Moreover, the AACs in LC sciences have been designed to support a process that is integrated longitudinally in teaching and learning, rather than merely the production of a report to be submitted for external assessment. The materials provided are intended to support that objective while giving students the flexibility to demonstrate their learning in a meaningful way. To publish sample AAC reports would be unhelpful in communicating the conceptualisation of science AACs as process rather than product.
The SEC has advised that examination papers and sample papers are not pretested. It is only when there is the added information of how candidates have actually engaged with and responded to questions in an examination setting that a suitable, effective and fair marking scheme can be produced. As a result, in line with established practice, and in the interest of absolute fairness, the SEC does not provide sample answers or marking schemes for sample papers.
More broadly, the SEC’s approach is guided by the need to ensure clarity, fairness and consistency for candidates, while also maintaining the integrity of the assessment process.
In relation to Generative Artificial Intelligence, the recently published SEC document Coursework Rules and Procedures 2025/2026 sets out the acceptable use and appropriate acknowledgement of AI tools in coursework.
A focus of all TPL provided explores how effective classroom learning and teaching develop students’ key competencies and support engagement with the AAC and the final examination. Teachers have engaged with full day Professional Learning Experiences (PLE) and a suite of collaborative events for each science subject.
A webinar specifically designed in collaboration with the SEC to support teacher engagement with the sample examination papers was provided immediately following the publication of the sample papers. 3,338 teachers across the three Science subjects attended.
This year, a full-day PLE was provided which focused explicitly on the AAC. This TPL involved detailed analysis of the AAC Guidelines, close examination of the learning outcomes assessed through the AAC, and practical exploration of how these learning outcomes can be embedded within classroom practice. Teachers engaged directly with the sample AAC brief and related materials to ensure a shared understanding of expectations.
Collectively, these measures demonstrate a coherent and sustained programme of professional learning support, ensuring that teachers are fully prepared to implement and support the AAC within the new science specifications.
My officials and I will continue to engage with all our education partners to ensure the redevelopment of senior cycle responds to the needs of our students, preparing them for their future lives in education and the workforce while upholding the high standards of fairness and equity for which the Leaving Certificate is known.